Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T22:49:04.439Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hoploparia albertaensis, a new species of clawed lobster (Nephropidae) from the late Coniacian, shallow-marine Bad Heart Formation of northwestern Alberta, Canada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Dale Tshudy
Affiliation:
Department of Geosciences, Edinboro University of Pennsylvania, Edinboro 16444,
W. Steven Donaldson
Affiliation:
Consultant, EnCana Corporation, EnCana on 9th, 150-9th Avenue SW, Calgary, Alberta T2P 2S5, Canada,
Christopher Collom
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, Mount Royal College, 4825 Richard Road SW, Calgary, Alberta T3E 4W8, Canada,
Rodney M. Feldmann
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio 44242,
Carrie E. Schweitzer
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Kent State University Stark Campus, Canton, Ohio 44720,

Abstract

A new species of clawed lobster, Hoploparia albertaensis, is reported from the late Coniacian, shallow-marine Bad Heart Formation of northwestern Alberta, Canada. Hoploparia is a well-known, clawed lobster genus with a record extending from Early Cretaceous (Valanginian) to Miocene. Fifty-one species of Hoploparia are known worldwide; 13 from the North American Western Interior Seaway. None of the 12 other Interior Seaway species, of any age, closely resembles the new species. The new species strongly resembles Hoploparia gabbi Pilsbry, 1901 from the upper Santonian–lower Campanian of the U.S. Mid-Atlantic Coastal Plain.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bishop, G. A. 1985. Fossil decapod crustaceans from the Gammon Ferruginous Member, Pierre Shale (Early Campanian), Black Hills, South Dakota. Journal of Paleontology, 59:605624.Google Scholar
Collom, C. J. 1997. Invertebrate paleontology and paleoenvironments of the Bad Heart Formation (Upper Cretaceous) west-central Alberta, Canada: Evidence for ancient hydrothermal seep communities in an epeiric seaway? Canadian Paleontology Conference VII, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Program and Abstracts, Geological Association of Canada Publications, p. 3.Google Scholar
Collom, C. J. 2001. Systematic Paleontology, Biostratigraphy, and Paleoenvironmental Analysis of the Upper Cretaceous Wapiabi Formation, Alberta, and British Columbia. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 807 p.Google Scholar
Collom, C. J., and Johnston, P. A. 2000. Late Cretaceous seep facies in the Western Interior of Canada and the United States: Iron Ooids, Carbonate Mounds, and Associated Tectonism. GeoCanada 2000 Millenium Geoscience Summit, 29 May–2 June, Calgary, Abstracts CD-ROM (Abstract #1043), 4, 1 fig.Google Scholar
Curtis, K., and Padian, K. 1999. An Early Jurassic microinvertebrate fauna from the Kayenta Formation of northeastern Arizona: Microfaunal change across the Triassic–Jurassic boundary. PaleoBios, 19:1937.Google Scholar
Dana, J. D. 1852. Macrura. Conspectus Crustaceorum. Conspectus of the Crustacea of the Exploring Expedition under Capt. C. Wilkes, U.S.N. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences, 6:1028.Google Scholar
Donaldson, W. S. 1997. The sedimentology, stratigraphy and diagenesis of the Upper Cretaceous Bad Heart Formation, NW Alberta. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada, 492 p.Google Scholar
Donaldson, W. S., Plint, A. G., and Longstaffe, F. J. 1998. Basement tectonic control on distribution of the shallow marine Bad Heart Formation: Peace River Arch area, NW Alberta. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology, 46:576598.Google Scholar
Donaldson, W. S., Plint, A. G., and Longstaffe, F. J. 1999. Tectonic and eustatic control on deposition and preservation of Upper Cretaceous ooidal ironstone and associated facies: Peace River Arch area, NW Alberta, Canada. Sedimentology, 46:11591182.Google Scholar
Ehrenberg, K. 1944. Ergäzende Bemerkungen zu den seinerzeit aus dem Miozän von Burgschleinitz beschriebenen Gangkernen und Bautun dekapoder Krebse. Paläontologisches Zeitschrift, 23:354359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fatheree, J. W., Harries, P. J., and Quinn, T. M. 1998. Oxygen and carbon isotopic “dissection” of Baculites compressus (Mollusca: Cephalopoda) from the Pierre Shale (Upper Campanian) of South Dakota: Implications for paleoenvironmental reconstructions. Palaios, 13(4):376385.Google Scholar
Feldmann, R. M. 1974. Hoploparia riddlensis, a new species of lobster (Decapoda: Nephropidae) from the Days Creek Formation (Hauterivian, Lower Cretaceous) of Oregon. Journal of Paleontology, 48(3):586593.Google Scholar
Feldmann, R. M., and Crame, J. A. 1998. The significance of a new nephropid lobster from the Miocene of Antarctica. Palaeontology, 41:807814.Google Scholar
Feldmann, R. M., and Holland, F. D. Jr. 1971. A new species of lobster from the Cannonball Formation (Paleocene) of North Dakota. Journal of Paleontology, 45(5):838843.Google Scholar
Feldmann, R. M., Bishop, G. S., and Kammer, T. W. 1977. Macrurous decapods from the Bearpaw Shale (Cretaceous; Campanian) of northeastern Montana. Journal of Paleontology, 51:11611180.Google Scholar
Haldemann, S. S. 1840. Supplement to number one of “A monograph of the Limniades, and other freshwater univalve shells of North America,” containing descriptions of apparently new animals in different classes, and the names and characters of the subgenera in Paludina and Anculosa. Philadelphia, 3 p.Google Scholar
Harbort, E. 1905. Die Fauna der Schaumburg-Lippeschen Kreidemulde. Abhandlungen Preussischen Geologischen Landesanstalt und Bergakademie, 45:1112.Google Scholar
Holthuis, L. B. 1974. The lobsters of the superfamily Nephropidae of the Atlantic Ocean (Crustacea: Decapoda). Bulletin of Marine Science, 24(4):723884.Google Scholar
Jenkins, R. J. F. 1972. Metanephrops, a new genus of Late Pliocene to recent lobsters (Decapoda, Nephropidae). Crustaceana, 22(2):161177.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. 1758. Systema Naturae per regna tria naturae secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentilis, synonymis, locis. Stockholm, 824 p.Google Scholar
Lundgren, S. A. B. 1891. Studier öfver fossilförande lösa block. Geologiska Föreningens Stockholm Förhandlingar, 13:111121.Google Scholar
McCoy, F. 1849. On the classification of some British fossil Crustacea, with notices of new forms in the University Collection at Cambridge. The Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 2(4):161179.Google Scholar
Miller, K. G., Sugarman, P. J., Browning, J. V., Cramer, B. S., Olsson, R. K., de Romero, L., Aubry, M.-P., Pekar, S. F., Georgescu, M. D., Metzger, K. T., Monteverde, D. H., Skinner, E. S., Uptegrove, J., Mullikin, L. G., Muller, F. L., Feigenson, M. D., Reilly, T. J., Brenner, G. J., and Queen, D. 1999. Ancora site. In Miller, K. G., Sugarman, P. J., Browning, J. V. et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Initial Reports, 174AX (Supplement), 165. (Online)Google Scholar
Milne-Edwards, H. 1837. Histoire Naturelle des Crustacés; comprenant l'anatomie, la Physiologie et la Classification de ces Animaux. Volume 2. Librarie Encyclopédique de Roret, Paris, 532 p.Google Scholar
Pilsbry, H. A. 1901. Crustacea of the Cretaceous Formation of New Jersey. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 53:111118.Google Scholar
Rathbun, M. J. 1926. Phylum Arthropoda, p. 184191, pls. 63–68. In Wade, B. (ed.), Fauna of the Ripley Formation on Coon Creek, Tennessee. United States Geological Survey Professional Paper, 137.Google Scholar
Rathbun, M. J. 1929. New species of fossil decapod crustaceans from California. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 19:469472.Google Scholar
Rathbun, M. J. 1935. Fossil Crustacea of the Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain. Geological Society of America Special Papers, 2, 160 p.Google Scholar
Ravn, J. P. J. 1903. The Tertiary Fauna at Kap Dalton (Grönland). Meddelelser on Groenland, 29:93140.Google Scholar
Reinhold, M. E. 2002. Extension of the biostratigraphic range of the gastropod (Neogastropoda) Amuletum (Amuletum) fasciolatum (Wade). Geological Society of America Abstracts with Program, 34(2):A-96.Google Scholar
Roberts, H. G. 1962. The Upper Cretaceous decapod crustaceans of New Jersey and Delaware, p. 163191, pls. 80–89. In Richards, H. G. (ed.), The Cretaceous fossils of New Jersey. Paleontology Series, Bureau of Geology and Topography Bulletin, 61 (2).Google Scholar
Schweitzer, C. E., and Feldmann, R. M. 2001. New Cretaceous and Tertiary decapod crustaceans from western North America. Bulletin of the Mizunami Fossil Museum, 28:175212.Google Scholar
Smith, A. G., Hurley, A. M., and Briden, J. C. 1981. Phanerozoic Paleocontinental World Maps. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 102 p.Google Scholar
Sowerby, J. 1826. Description of a new species of Astacus, found in a fossil state at Lyme Regis. Zoological Journal, 2:293494.Google Scholar
Stenzel, H. B. 1945. Decapod crustaceans from the Cretaceous of Texas. University of Texas Contributions to Geology, 4401:400477.Google Scholar
Sternberg, K. M. Graf. von. 1833. Versuch einer geognostisch-botanischen Darstellung der Flora der Vorwelt, 5.Google Scholar
Tshudy, D., 1993. Taxonomy and evolution of the clawed lobster families Chilenophoberidae and Nephropidae. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio, 472 p.Google Scholar
Tshudy, D., and Babcock, L. 1997. Morphology-based phylogenetic analysis of the clawed lobsters (family Nephropidae and the new family Chilenophoberidae). Journal of Crustacean Biology, 17:253263.Google Scholar
Tshudy, D., and Parsons, G. 1998. Intraspecific variation in external morphology of the American lobster, Homarus americanus (Crustacea: Decapoda: Nephropidae). Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 111:102109.Google Scholar
Tshudy, D., and Sorhannus, U. 2000. Jagtia kunradensis, a new genus and species of clawed lobster (Decapoda: Nephropidae) from the Upper Cretaceous (Upper Maastrichtian) Maastricht Formation, The Netherlands. Journal of Paleontology, 74:224229.Google Scholar
Tshudy, D., Sorhannus, U. 2003. Hoploparia, the best known fossil clawed lobster (family Nephropidae), is a “wastebasket” genus. Journal of Crustacean Biology, 23(3):700711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wade, B. 1926. The fauna of the Ripley Formation on Coon Creek, Tennessee. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 137, 272 p.Google Scholar
Weber, F. 1795. Nomenclator entomologicus secundum Entomologiam systematicam ill. Fabricii adjectis speciebus recens detectis et varietatibus, 171 p.Google Scholar
Weller, S. 1903. The Stokes collection of Antarctic Fossils. Journal of Geology, 11:413419.Google Scholar
Whitfield, R. P. 1907. Notice of an American species of the genus Hoploparia McCoy, from the Cretaceous of Montana. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 23:459461.Google Scholar
White, A. 1847. List of specimens of Crustacea in the collection of the British Museum. British Museum, London, 143 p. (not seen)Google Scholar
Wilckens, O. 1907. Die Llamellibranchiaten, Gastropoden u.s.w. der oberen Kreide Südpatagoniens. Berichte der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft zu Freiberg i Br., 15:97166.Google Scholar
Woods, H. 1929. A Monograph of the Fossil Macrurous Crustacea of England. Paleontographical Society, London, 122 p.Google Scholar
Woodward, H. 1900. Further notes on podophthalmous crustaceans from the Upper Cretaceous formation of British Columbia, etc. Geological Magazine, n. s., 4, 7:433435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar