Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T01:49:51.973Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Generic concepts in the Amphoracrinidae Bather, 1899 (Class Crinoidea) and evaluation of generic assignments of North American species

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

William I. Ausich  and
Thomas W. Kammer
William I. Ausich
Affiliation:
School of Earth Sciences, 155 South Oval Mall, The Ohio State University, Columbus 43210,
Thomas W. Kammer
Affiliation:
Department of Geology and Geography, West Virginia University, Morgantown 26506-6300,
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Amphoracrinidae Bather, 1899 is redefined, and all genera of this family are diagnosed with objective characters. Dilatocrinus Webster and Lane, 1987 and Pimlicocrinus Wright, 1943 are transferred into the Amphoracrinidae. Type specimens that define Displodocrinus Webster and Lane, 1987 and Dilatocrinus Webster and Lane, 1987 are clarified. The emphasis here is on genus definition, and comprehensive species-level systematics is not attempted. However, Amphoracrinus blairi Miller and Gurley, 1896a and Amphoracrinus jessieae Miller and Gurley, 1896b are designated nomina dubia; Sampsonocrinus sp. Webster and Lane, 1987 is reassigned to Amphoracrinus rupinus Webster and Lane, 1987; Amphoracrinus divergens var. multiramosus (Meek and Worthen, 1866) is reassigned to Dilatocrinus multiramosus (Meek and Worthen, 1866); and Sunwaptacrinus nevadensis Webster and Lane, 1987 is reassigned to Displodocrinus nevadensis (Webster and Lane, 1987).

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 82 , Issue 6 , November 2008 , pp. 1139 - 1149
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ausich, W. I. 1983. Component concept for the study of paleocommunities with an example from the Early Carboniferous of southern Indiana. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 44:251–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ausich, W. I. 1987. Brassfield Compsocrinina (Lower Silurian crinoids) from Ohio. Journal of Paleontology, 61:552–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ausich, W. I., Brett, C. E., Hess, H., and Simms, M. J. 1999. Crinoid form and function, p. 3–30. In Hess, H., Ausich, W. I., Brett, C. E., and Simms, M. J., Fossil Crinoids. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ausich, W. I. and Kammer, T. W. 2006. Stratigraphic and geographic distribution of Lower Carboniferous Crinoidea from England and Wales. Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society, 56(2):91–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ausich, W. I. and Sevastopulo, G. D. 2001. Lower Carboniferous (Tournaisian) crinoids from Hook Head, County Wexford, Ireland. Monograph of the Palaeontographical Society 617, 136 p.Google Scholar
Austin, T. 1848. Observations on the Cystidea of M. Von Buch, and the Crinoidea generally. Geological Society of London, Quarterly Journal, 4:291–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, T. Sr. and Austin, T. Jr. 1842. Proposed arrangement of the Echinodermata, particularly as regards the Crinoidea and subdivisions of the Adelostella (Echinidae). Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 11:195–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, T. Sr. and Austin, T. Jr. 1843. Description of several new genera and species of Crinoidea. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, ser. 1, 11(69):195–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassler, R. S. and Moodey, M. W. 1943. Bibliographic and faunal index of Paleozoic pelmatozoan echinoderms. Geological Society of America Special Paper, 45, 734 p.Google Scholar
Bather, F. A. 1899. A phylogenetic classification of the Pelmatozoa. British Association for the Advancement of Science (1898), 916–923.Google Scholar
Bronn, H. G. 1849. Index palaeontologicus, unter Mitwirking der Herren Prof. Göppert, H. R. und von Meyer, H. Handbuch einer Geschichte der Nature, 5, Abt. 1, A. Nomenclator Palaeontologicus, 1381 p.Google Scholar
Chen, Z.-T. and Yao, J.-H. 1993. Palaeozoic echinoderm fossils of western Yunnan, China. Beijing, Geological Publishing House, 102 p.Google Scholar
Delpey, G. 1941. Crinoîdes du viséen superieur dans le pays de Skouva, au Maroc. Bulletin de la Société des Sciences Naturelles du Maroc Rabat, 19:214–220.Google Scholar
Donovan, S. K. 1992. A field guide to the fossil echinoderms of Coplow, Bellman and Salthill Quarries, Clitheroe, Lancashire. North West Geologist, 2:33–54.Google Scholar
Gahn, F. J. 2002. Crinoid and blastoid biozonation and biodiversity in the Early Mississippian (Osagean) Burlington Limestone. Iowa Department of Natural Resources Geological Survey Guidebook, 23:53–74.Google Scholar
Gahn, F. J. and Kammer, T. W. 2002. The cladid crinoid Barycrinus from the Burlington Limestone (Early Osagean) and the phylogenetics of Mississippian botryocrinids. Journal of Paleontology, 76:123–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grabau, A. W. and Shimer, W. H. 1910. North American index fossils, invertebrates, Vol. 2. New York, 909 p.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1859. Contributions to the palaeontology of Iowa, being descriptions of new species of Crinoidea and other fossils. Supplement to vol. I, part II, of the Geological Report of Iowa, 92 p.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1863. Preliminary notice, of some species of Crinoidea from the Waverly Sandstone series of Summit Co., Ohio, supposed to be of the age of the Chemung Group of New York. Preprint of Seventeenth Annual Report of the Regents of the University of the State of New-York, on the condition of the State Cabinet of Natural History, and the Historical and Antiquarian Collection annexed thereto, State of New York in Senate Document 189, Albany, Comstock and Cassiday Printers, p. 50–60.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1872. Description of new species of crinoidea from the Carboniferous rocks of the Mississippi Valley, p. 261–328.Google Scholar
Heckel, P. and Clayton, G. 2005. Official names of the Carboniferous System. Geology Today, 21(6):213–214.Google Scholar
Jaekel, O. 1918. Phylogenie und System der Pelmatozoen. Paläeontologische Zeitschrift, 3(1), 128 p.Google Scholar
Kammer, T. W. 1984. Crinoids from the New Providence Shale Member of the Borden Formation (Mississippian) in Kentucky and Indiana. Journal of Paleontology, 58:115–130.Google Scholar
Kammer, T. W. and Ausich, W. I. 2007. Stratigraphical and geographical distribution of Mississippian (Lower Carboniferous) Crinoidea from Scotland. Earth and Environmental Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 98:139–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keyes, C. R. 1894. Paleontology of Missouri, Pt. I, Missouri Geological Survey, 4:143–225.Google Scholar
Koninck, L. G. de and le Hon, H. 1854. Recherches sur les crinoides du terrain carbonifere de la Belgique. Academie Royal de Belgique Memoir, 28(3), 215 p.Google Scholar
Laudon, L. R., Parks, J. M., and Spreng, A. C. 1952. Mississippian crinoid fauna from the Banff Formation Sunwapta Pass, Alberta. Journal of Paleontology, 26:544–575.Google Scholar
M'Coy, F. 1849. On some new Paleozoic Echinodermata. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, series 2, 3:244–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
M'Coy, F. 1851. On the fossil botany and zoology of the rocks associated with the coal of Australia. Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Van Diemen's Land, 1:303–331.Google Scholar
Meek, F. B. and Worthen, A. H. 1866. Contributions to the palaeontology of Illinois and other western states. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia (1865), 17:251–274.Google Scholar
Meek, F. B. and Worthen, A. H. 1868. Remarks on some types of Carboniferous crinoidea, with descriptions of new genera and species of the same, and of one echinoid. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 20:335–359.Google Scholar
Meek, F. B. and Worthen, A. H. 1873. Palaeontology, Descriptions of invertebrates from Carboniferous System. Illinois Geological Survey, 5(2):323–619.Google Scholar
Miller, J. S. 1821. A Natural History of the Crinoidea or Lily-Shaped Animals, with Observations on the Genera Asteria, Euryale, Comatula and Marsupites. Bryan, Bristol, 150 p.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A. 1889. North American Geology and Paleontology. Western Methodist Book Concern, Cincinnati, 664 p.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A. 1890. The structure, classification and arrangement of American Palaeozoic crinoids into families. American Geologist, 6:275–286,340–357.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A. 1897. Second appendix to North American Geology and Palaeontology, p. 719–793.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A. and Gurley, W. F. E. 1896a Description of new and remarkable fossils from the Palaeozoic rocks of the Mississippi Valley. Illinois State Museum Bulletin, 8, 65 p.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A. and Gurley, W. F. E., 1896b, New species of Echinodermata and a new crustacean from the Palaeozoic rocks. Illinois State Museum Bulletin, 10, 91 p.Google Scholar
Moore, R. C. and Laudon, L. R. 1943. Evolution and classification of Paleozoic crinoids. Geological Society of America Special Paper, 46, 151 p.Google Scholar
Moore, R. C. and Laudon, L. R. 1944. Class Crinoidea, p. 137–209. In Shimer, H. W. and Shrock, R. R., Index fossils of North America. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
Peck, R. E. and Keyte, I. A. The Crinoidea of the Chouteau Limestone, p. 70–108. In Branson, E. B. (ed.), Stratigraphy and paleontology of the Lower Mississippian of Missouri, Pt. 2: Missouri University Studies, 13(4).Google Scholar
Phillips, J. 1836. Illustrations of the geology of Yorkshire, or a description of the strata and organic remains, Pt. 2, The Mountain Limestone districts. 2nd edition. John Murray, London. 203–208.Google Scholar
Rofe, J. 1865. Notes on some Echinodermata from the Mountain Limestone, etc. Geological Magazine, 2:245–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shumard, B. F. 1868. A catalogue of the Palaeozoic fossils of North America: Pt. I, Paleozoic Echinodermata. Transactions of the St. Louis Academy of Science (1866), 2:334–407.Google Scholar
Ubaghs, G. 1978a. Camerata, p. T408–T518. In Moore, R. C. and Teichert, K. (eds.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. T, Echinodermata. 2, vol. 2, pp. T58–T216, 144 figs. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
Ubaghs, G. 1978b. Skeletal morphology of fossil crinoids, T58–T216. In Moore, R. C. and Teichert, K. (eds.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. T, Echinodermata. 2, vol. 2, pp. T58-T216, 144 figs. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
Wachsmuth, C. and Springer, F. 1880–1886. Revision of the Palaeocrinoidea. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia Pt. II. Family Sphaeroidocrinidae, with the sub-families Platycrinidae, Rhodocrinidae, and Actinocrinidae (1881):177–411. (separate repaged, 1–237); Pt. III, Sec. 1. Discussion of the classification and relations of the brachiate crinoids, and conclusion of the generic descriptions (1885):225–364 (separate repaged, 1–138).Google Scholar
Wachsmuth, C. and Springer, F. 1889. Discovery of the ventral structure of Taxocrinus and Haplocrinus, and consequent modifications in the classifications of the crinoidea. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 40:337–363.Google Scholar
Wachsmuth, C. and Springer, F. 1897. The North American Crinoidea Camerata. Harvard College Museum of Comparative Zoology Memoir, 20 and 21, 897 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, G. D. 1973. Bibliography and index of Paleozoic crinoids, 1942–1968. Geological Society of America Memoir 137, 341 p.Google Scholar
Webster, G. D. 1993. Bibliography and index of Paleozoic crinoids, 1986–1990. Geological Society of America Microform Publication, 25, 204 p.Google Scholar
Webster, G. D. 2003. Bibliography and index of Paleozoic crinoids, coronates, and hemistreptocrinids 1758–1999. Geological Society of America Special Paper 363, <http://crinoid.gsajournals.org/crinoidmod>..>Google Scholar
Webster, G. D. and Lane, N. G. 1987. Crinoids from the Anchor Limestone (Lower Mississippian) of the Monte Cristo Group southern Nevada. University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions Paper, 119, 55 p.Google Scholar
Webster, G. D., Maples, C. G., Sevastopulo, G. D., Frest, T., and Waters, J. A. 2004. Carboniferous (Viséan-Moscovian) echinoderms from the Béchar Basin area of western Algeria. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 368, 98 p.Google Scholar
Weller, S. 1898. A bibliographic index of Carboniferous invertebrates. U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin, 153, 653 p.Google Scholar
White, C. A. 1862. Description of new species of fossils from the Devonian and Carboniferous rocks of the Mississippi Valley. Boston Society of Natural History Journal, 9:8–33.Google Scholar
White, C. A. 1865. Description of new species of fossils from the Devonian and Carboniferous rocks of the Mississippi Valley. Boston Society of Natural History Journal, 9:8–33.Google Scholar
Whitfield, R. P. 1893. Republication of descriptions of Lower Carboniferous Crinoidea from the Hall collection now in the American Museum Natural History with illustrations of the original type specimens not heretofore figured. American Museum of Natural History Memoir, 1(1), 37 p.Google Scholar
Wright, J. 1942. New British Carboniferous crinoids. Geological Magazine, 79:269–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, J. 1943. Pimlicocrinus gen. nov. and two new species of Amphoracrinus from the Carboniferous Limestone. Geological Magazine, 80:81–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, J. 1955. The British Carboniferous Crinoidea: Palaeontographical Society, Monograph, 2(1):191–254.Google Scholar