Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T08:59:26.756Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ecdysis in Flexicalymene meeki (Trilobita)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Danita S. Brandt
Danita S. Brandt*
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The ecdysial style of Flexicalymene meeki (Foerste) from the Upper Ordovician of the Cincinnati arch (Ohio) is best characterized by a spectrum of configurations. Recurring patterns of displaced tergites and points of disarticulation indicate differential susceptibility of the exoskeleton to disarticulation during ecdysis. Specimens identified as exuviae are characterized by one or more of the following: thoracic segments displaced (unevenly spaced, disarticulated or telescoped); pygidia and/or cephala rotated away from the sagittal line; cephalon sharply bent ventrally at first thoracic segment; librigenae separated or folded ventrally along facial sutures; “extra” tergites (exuvia) superposed on the new exoskeleton; and missing elements, especially librigenae and hypostomae. The range of exuvial configurations suggests a variety of ecdysial behavior in this trilobite.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 67 , Issue 6 , November 1993 , pp. 999 - 1005
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Babcock, L. E., and Speyer, S. E. 1987. Enrolled trilobites from the Alden Pyrite Bed, Ledyard Shale (Middle Devonian) of western New York. Journal of Paleontology, 61:539–548.Google Scholar
Bergström, J. 1973. Organization, life, and systematics of trilobites. Fossils and Strata, 2, 69 p.Google Scholar
Brandt Velbel, D. 1985. Ichnologic, taphonomic, and sedimentologic clues to the deposition of Cincinnatian shales (Upper Ordovician), Ohio, U.S.A., p. 299–307. In Curran, H. A. (ed.), Biogenic Structures: Their Use in Interpreting Depositional Environment. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists Special Publication 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandt, D. S. 1989. Taphonomic grades as a classification for fossiliferous assemblages and implications for paleoecology. Palaios, 4:303–309.Google Scholar
Cisne, J. L. 1973. Beecher's trilobite bed revisited: ecology of an Ordovician deepwater fauna. Yale University Peabody Museum Postilla, 160, 25 p.Google Scholar
Erdtmann, B.-D. 1978. Microstructure of “paper shell” stage (post-ecdysial cuticle) of the Middle Devonian trilobite Phacops rana from Silica Shale of Ohio. Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs, 10:252.Google Scholar
Evitt, W. R., and Whittington, H. B. 1953. The exoskeleton of Flexicalymene. Journal of Paleontology, 27:49–55.Google Scholar
Fortey, R. A. 1990. Ontogeny, hypostome attachment and trilobite classification. Palaeontology, 33:529–576.Google Scholar
Harrington, H. J. 1959. General description of Trilobita, p. O38–O116. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part O, Arthropoda. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence, Kansas.Google Scholar
Henningsmoen, G. 1975. Moulting in trilobites. Fossils and Strata, 4:179–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, C-H. 1971. Ontogeny and sexual dimorphism of lower Paleozoic trilobita. Palaeontographia Americana, 7, 155 p.Google Scholar
Ladd, H. S. 1928. The stratigraphy and paleontology of the Maquoketa Shale of Iowa, Part I. Iowa Geological Survey Annual Report, 34:305–448.Google Scholar
McNamara, K. J., and Rudkin, D. M. 1984. Techniques of trilobite exuviation. Lethaia, 17:153–173.Google Scholar
Mikulic, D. G. 1990. The arthropod fossil record: biologic and taphonomic controls on its composition, p. 1–23. In Culver, S. J. (ed.), Arthropod Paleobiology. Short Courses in Paleontology, Number 3. Paleontological Society.Google Scholar
Mikulic, D. G., and Watkins, R. 1981. Trilobite ecology in the Ludlow Series of the Welsh Borderland, p. 101–117. In Gray, J., Boucot, A. J., and Berry, W. B. N. (eds.), Communities of the Past. Hutchinson Ross Publishing Company, Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Miller, J., and Clarkson, E. N. K. 1980. The post-ecdysial development of the cuticle and the eye of the Devonian trilobite Phacops rana milleri Stewart 1927. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, Biological Sciences, 288:461–480.Google Scholar
Mutvei, H. 1981. Exoskeletal structure in the Ordovician trilobite Flexicalymene. Lethaia, 14:225–234.Google Scholar
Schäfer, W. 1972. Ecology and Palaeoecology of Marine Environments. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 568 p.Google Scholar
Speyer, S. E. 1985. Moulting in phacopid trilobites. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 76:239–253.Google Scholar
Whittington, H. B. 1988. Hypostomes of post-Cambrian trilobites. New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources Memoir, 44:321–339.Google Scholar