Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T15:41:40.769Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dimorpharaea de Fromentel, 1861 (Scleractinia, Anthozoa) from the Middle Jurassic of Kachchh, India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Dhirendra K. Pandey ,
Christopher A. McRoberts  and
Manoj K. Pandit
Dhirendra K. Pandey
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Rajasthan, Jaipur 302004, India,
Christopher A. McRoberts
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, State University of New York at Cortland, P.O. Box 2000, Cortland, New York 13045
Manoj K. Pandit
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Rajasthan, Jaipur 302004, India,
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The current classification of scleractinian corals based upon gross morphological features has been found unsatisfactory due to additional information from skeletal microarchitecture and microstructure. It is necessary to investigate microstructural details and limits in morphologic variation within and between different coral clades before a revised classification is constructed. Variations in morphologic characters and microstructural details from a population of Dimorpharaea de Fromentel, 1861 (Family Microsolenidae) from Upper Bathonian (Jumara Dome) strata in Kachchh are described. The data used include the diameter (D) and height (H) of the corallum, number of corallites in the colony (NC), number of septa in the mother corallite at the center of the colony (NS), minimum distance between centers of central corallite and corallite of the inner ring (C1), minimum distance between corallite centers of the outer ring (C2), septal density (DS) and trabecular density (DT). The principal components analysis reveals that most of the variation is explained by “size” related characters (D and H) while corallite density (NC and C1) and septal structures (DS and DT) contribute to the second and third principal component axes, respectively. The microarchitecture and distribution of characters observed in the Kachchh Dimorpharaea require a re-evaluation of familial-specific concepts and suggest that the population belongs to a single species, Dimorpharaea stellans Gregory, 1900, rather than four nominal species (D. stellans, D. distincta, D. continua and D. orbica) as has been assumed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 73 , Issue 6 , November 1999 , pp. 1015 - 1028
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beauvais, L. 1964. Étude stratigraphique et paléontologique des formations à madréporaires du Jurassique supérieur du Jura et de l'Est du Bassin de Paris. Mémoires de la Société géologique de France, 100, 287 p.Google Scholar
Beauvais, L. 1966. Révision des Madréporaires du Dogger de la collection Koby. Eclogae geologicae Helvetiae, 59:989–1024.Google Scholar
Beauvais, L. 1970a. Madréporaires du Dogger: Étude des types de H. Milne-Edwards et J. Haime. Annales de Paléontologie (Invertébrés), 56:39–74.Google Scholar
Beauvais, L. 1970b. Etude de quelques polypiers bajociens du Maroc oriental. Notes du Service géologique du Maroc, 30:39–50.Google Scholar
Beauvais, L. 1972. Contribution à l'étude de la faune Bathonienne dans la vallée de la Creuse (Indre) Madréporaires. Annales de Paléontologie (Invertébrés), 58:35–87, pls. A-E.Google Scholar
Beauvais, L. 1972a. Révision des madréporaires du Dogger de Balin (Pologne) Collection Reuss. Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien, 76:29–35, pl. 1-2.Google Scholar
Beauvais, L. 1978. Révision des topotypes de madréporaires bathoniens de Cutch (Inde), collection GREGORY, British Museum de Londres. Annales de Paléontologie (Invertébrés), 64:47–68.Google Scholar
Bendukidze, N. 1949. Upper Jurassic corals from Rachi Ridge and south Ossetia. Trudy geologicheskogo instituta AN Gruzinskoy SSR, (seriya geologiya), 5:55–172, 2 tables, 9 pls.Google Scholar
Biswas, S. K. 1977. Mesozoic Rock-Stratigraphy of Kutch, Gujarat. The Quarterly Journal of the Geological, Mining and Metallurgical Society of India, 49:1–51.Google Scholar
Biswas, S. K. 1987. Regional tectonic framework, structure and evolution of the western marginal basins of India. Tectonophysics, 135:307–327.Google Scholar
de Blainville, H. M. 1830. Zoophytes, p. 274–364. In Defrance, J. L. M. (ed.), Dictionnaire des Sciences Naturelles, 60, 546 p. Google Scholar
Bourne, G. C. 1900. Scleractinia by John W. Wells, p. F369. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paeontology, Pt. F, Coelenterata. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Callomon, J. H. 1993. On Perisphinctes congener Waagen, 1875 and the age of the Patcham Limestone in the Middle Jurassic of Jumara, Kutch, India. Geologische Blätter für NO-Bayern und angrenzende Gebiete, 43:227–246.Google Scholar
Cuif, J. P. 1980. Microstructure vs. morphology in the skeleton of Triassic Scleractinian corals, p. 361–374. In Osmólska, H. (ed.), Third International Symposium on Fossil Cnidarians, Warszawa 1979. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 25.Google Scholar
Cuif, J. P., and Gautret, P. 1993. Evolution des Scléractiniaires: diversité des architectures poreuses au Trias supérieur. Geobios, 26, 4:405–412, 1 pl.Google Scholar
Duncan, P. M. 1872. A monograph of the British fossil corals, second series, Pt. 3, Corals from oolitic strata. Palaeontographical Society monograph, 7 pls., 24 p.Google Scholar
Eguchi, M. 1951. Mesozoic hexacorals from Japan. Science Reports of the Tohoku Imperial University 2nd series, 24:1–96, 28 pls.Google Scholar
Ehrenberg, C. G. 1834. Beiträge zur Physiologischen Kenntniss der Corallenthiere im Allgemeinen und besonders des Rothen Meeres. Abhandlungen der Königlichen Academie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, 1832, p. 225–380.Google Scholar
Eichwald, E. 1865. Lethaea rossica ou Paléontologie de la Russie. 2:113–170.Google Scholar
Etallon, A. 1859. Études paléontologiques sur le Haut-Jura. Rayonnés du Corallien. Mémoires de la Société d'émulation du Doubs, 6:53–260.Google Scholar
Flügel, E. 1966. Mitteljurassische Korallen vom Ostrand der Grossen Salzwüste (Shotori-Kette, Iran). Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie. 126:46–91.Google Scholar
de Fromentel, E. 1858-1861. Introduction á l'étude des polypiers fossiles. Mémoires de la Société d'émulation du Doubs, (3)5, 357 p.Google Scholar
Fürsich, F. T., Pandey, D. K., Oschmann, W., Callomon, J. H., and Jaitly, A. K. 1994a. Contribution to the Jurassic of Kachchh, Western India. II. Bathonian stratigraphy and depositional environment of the Sadhara Dome, Pachchham Island. Beringeria, 12:95–125.Google Scholar
Fürsich, F. T., Pandey, D. K., Oschmann, W., Callomon, J. H., and Singh, I. B. 1994b. Ecology and adaptive strategies of corals in unfavourable environments: examples from the middle Jurassic of Kachchh Basin, Western India. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen, 194:269–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, G. A. 1967. Quelques précisions sur les septes perforés des Polypiers mésozoïques. Mémoires de la Société géologique de France, Number 106, 46:57–81.Google Scholar
Gill, G. A. 1975. Essai de regroupement des Stylines (Hexacoralliaires) d'après la morphologie des bords internes de leurs septes. Mémoires du Bureau de Recherches Géologiques et Minières, 89:283–295.Google Scholar
Gill, G. A. 1982. A supposed Rhythmic mechanical process in coral skeletal growth, p. 445–466. In Montanaro-Gallitelli, E. (ed.), Proceedings 1st International meeting “Paleontology, essential of historical geology” 1981, Modena.Google Scholar
Gill, G. A., and Lafuste, G. J. 1971. Madréporaires simples du Dogger d'Afghanistan: étude sur les structures de type “Montlivaltia.” Mémoires de la Société Géologique de France, Nouvelle série Number 115, 50:1–40.Google Scholar
Gill, G. A., and Loreau, J. P. 1988. Jurassic coral genera from ODP site 639, Atlantic Ocean, West of Spain. Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program. Scientific Results, 103:89–103.Google Scholar
Gill, G. A., and Russo, A. 1980. Recognition of pennular structure of Mesozoic corals in Discotrochus orbignyanus from the Eocene of the Gulf States. Journal of Paleontology, 54:1108–1112.Google Scholar
Gregory, J. W. 1900. Jurassic fauna of Cutch, the corals. Memoirs of the Geological Survey of India. Palaeontologia Indica, series 9, 2(2):1–195.Google Scholar
Koby, F. 1880-1889. Monographie des polypiers jurassiques de la Suisse. Mémoires de la Société paléontologique Suisse (Abhandlungen der schweizerischen paläontologischen Gesellschaft), 7-16:1–582, pls. 1-130.Google Scholar
Koby, F. 1907. Polypiers bathoniens de St-Gaultier. Mémoires de la Société paléontologique Suisse (Abhandlungen der schweizerischen paläontologischen Gesellschaft), 33 (for 1906):1–61.Google Scholar
Michelin, H. 1840. Iconographie zoophytologique. Description par localités et terrains des polypiers fossiles de France, Pt. 1, 16 p.Google Scholar
Lathuilière, B. 1989. Répertoire objectif des coraux jurassiques. Presses Universitaires de Nancy, Nancy, 76 p.Google Scholar
Lathuilière, B. 1990. Periseris, Scléractiniaire colonial jurassique. Révision structurale et taxinomie de populations bajociennes de l'Est de la France. Geobios, 23:33–55.Google Scholar
Lathuilière, B., and Gill, G. A. 1995. Some new suggestions on functional morphology in pennular corals, p. 259–264. In Lathuilière, B. and Geister, J. (eds.), Coral Reef in the Past, Present and Future, Volume 29. Service géologique du Luxembourg, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
Löser, H., and Raeder, M. 1995. Coral assemblages from the Aptian/Albian in the Helicon Mountains (Boeotia, Greece): palaeontological, palaeoecological and palaeogeographical aspects. Coral Research Bulletin, 4:37–63.Google Scholar
Milne-Edwards, H. 1860. Histoire naturelle des Coralliaires ou Polypes proprement dits. Librairie Encyclopédique Roret, 3:1–560.Google Scholar
Milne-Edwards, H., and Haime, J. 1851. A monograph of the British fossil corals. 2. Corals from the oolitic formations. Palaeontographical Society Monograph 5:71–145, pls. 12-30.Google Scholar
Morycowa, E. 1974. Hexacorallia d'un bloc exotique de calcaire tithonique à Wozniki près de Wadowice (Carpathes polonaises occidentales). Acta Geologica Polonica, 24, 3:457–484, 12 pls.Google Scholar
Morycowa, E., and Roniewicz, E. 1995. Microstructural disparity between Recent fungiine and Mesozoic microsolenine scleractinians. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 40:361–285.Google Scholar
Pandey, D. K., and Fürsich, F. T. 1993. Contribution to the Jurassic of Kachchh, Western India. I. The coral fauna. Beringeria, 8:3–69.Google Scholar
Römer, F. A. 1836. Die Versteinerungen der norddeutschen Oolithen-Gebirges. 218 p.Google Scholar
Roniewicz, E. 1982. Pennular and non-pennular Jurassic scleractinians—some examples. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 27:157–193.Google Scholar
Roniewicz, E., and Morycowa, E. 1993. Evolution of the Scleractinia in the light of microstructural data. Sonderdruck aus Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, 164:233–240.Google Scholar
Schlichter, D. 1991. A perforated gastrovascular cavity in Leptoseris fragilis. A new strategy to improve heterotrophic nutrition in corals. Naturwissenschaften, 78:467–469.Google Scholar
Schlichter, D. 1992. A perforated gastrovascular cavity in the symbiotic deep-water coral Leptoseris fragilis: a new strategy to optimize heterotrophic nutrition. Helgoländer Meeresuntersuchungen, 45:423–443.Google Scholar
Spath, L. F. 1933. Revision of the Jurassic Cephalopod fauna of Kachh (Cutch). Memoirs of the Geological Survey of India. Palaeontologica Indica new series, 9:659–945.Google Scholar
Tomes, R. F. 1878. A list of the Madreporaria of Crickley Hill, Gloucestershire, with descriptions of some new species. Geological Magazine, Series 2, 5:297–305.Google Scholar
Tomes, R. F. 1882. On the Madreporaria of the Inferior Oolite of the neighborhood of Cheltenham and Gloucester. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, 38:409–450.Google Scholar
Waagen, W. 1871. Abstract of the results of examination of the Ammonite Fauna of Kutch, with remarks on their distribution among the beds, and probable age. Records Geological Survey of India, 4:89–101.Google Scholar
Wendt, J. 1990. Corals and coralline sponges, p. 45–66. In Carter, J. G. (ed.), Skeletal Biomineralization: Patterns, Processes and Evolutionary Trends, Volume 1. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, L., Hill, M., and Vang, E. 1992. SYSTAT: Statistics, version 5.2. Systat Inc., Evanston, 724 p.Google Scholar