Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T14:07:08.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Clinal variation in the evolution of Ectenocrinus simplex

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2016

Robert Titus
Robert Titus*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Hartwick College, Oneonta, New York 13820
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The crinoid Ectenocrinus has unusual trimeric columnals which make it instantly recognizable. In northern New York State such columnals first appear in the deep shelf facies of the lower Trenton Group (the Sugar River Limestone). In these strata the columnals display nearly triangular shapes with triangular lumina and represent a new species, E. triangulus. A small minority of the columnals of these early forms are round with five-pointed lumina.

A definite cline had developed by middle Trentonian time. Deep-water columnals display the ancestral triangular form, whereas adjacent, shallow-water forms are rounder and have the five-pointed or pentagonal lumina. These round types came to be the beneficiaries of middle Trentonian facies changes. This was a time when the eastern bank margin steepened and narrowed. The deep shelf habitat shrank to the east and disappeared. Trapped in this shrinking sea floor setting, the populations of the deep-water members of the cline dwindled and disappeared before late Trentonian time. Only the round form with a pentagonal lumen survived. This form, Ectenocrinus simplex, was a great success; its numbers increased and its range expanded throughout the remainder of Trentonian time.

The transition from Ectenocrinus triangulus to E. simplex is seamless. No boundary, other than an arbitrary one, can be recognized. A simple and gradual shift of phenotype abundance characterized the event.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 63 , Issue 1 , January 1989 , pp. 81 - 91
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Billings, E. 1859. On the Crinoideae of the Lower Silurian rocks of Canada. Geological Survey of Canada, Canadian Organic Remains, Decade IV, 72 p.Google Scholar
Cameron, B. 1972. Stratigraphy of the marine limestones and shales of the Ordovician Trenton Group in central New York, p. C.1–C.23. In McLelland, J. (ed.), New York State Geological Association Field Trip Guidebook, 44th Annual Meeting.Google Scholar
Chandlee, G., and Cisne, J. L. 1980. Geographic and temporal variation in Paucicrura rogata (Brachiopoda) along an Ordovician depth gradient. Geological Society of America, Abstracts With Programs, 12:401.Google Scholar
Chenoweth, P. 1952. Statistical methods applied to Trentonian stratigraphy in New York. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 63:521–560.Google Scholar
Cisne, J., and Rabe, B. D. 1978. Coenocorrelations: gradient analysis of fossil communities and its applications in stratigraphy. Lethaia, 11:341–374.Google Scholar
Cisne, J., Molenock, J., and Rabe, B. D. 1980. Evolution in a cline: the trilobite Triarthrus along an Ordovician depth gradient. Lethaia, 13:47–60.Google Scholar
Cisne, J., Chandlee, G. O., Rabe, B. D., and Cohen, J. A. 1980. Geographic variation and episodic evolution in an Ordovician trilobite. Science, 209:925–927.Google Scholar
Cisne, J., Chandlee, G. O., Rabe, B. D., and Cohen, J. A. 1982. Clinal variation, episodic evolution, and possible parapatric speciation: the trilobite Flexicalymene senaria along an Ordovician depth gradient. Lethaia, 15:325–341.Google Scholar
Cushing, H. 1909. An untitled footnote, p. 21. In Miller, W., Geology of the Remsen Quadrangle. New York State Museum Bulletin, 126.Google Scholar
Donovan, S. 1986. Pelmatozoan columnals from the Ordovician of the British Isles. Monograph of the Palaeontographical Association, 138, 68 p.Google Scholar
Fisher, D. 1977. Correlation of the Hadrynian, Cambrian and Ordovician rocks of New York State. New York State Museum Map and Chart Series, 25, 75 p.Google Scholar
Fisher, D. 1979. Folding in the foreland, Middle Ordovician Dolgeville facies, Mohawk Valley, New York. Geology, 7:455–459.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1847. Paleontology, Vol. 1, New York Geological Survey. C. Van Benthuysen, Albany, New York, 339 p.Google Scholar
Kay, M. 1937. Stratigraphy of the Trenton Group. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 46:233–302.Google Scholar
Kay, M. 1943. Mohawkian series on West Canada Creek, New York. American Journal of Science, 241:597–606.Google Scholar
Kay, M. 1953. Geology of the Utica quadrangle, New York. New York State Museum Bulletin, 347, 126 p.Google Scholar
Kay, M. 1968. Ordovician formations in northwestern New York. Le Naturaliste Canadien, 95:1373–1378.Google Scholar
Kirk, E. 1914. Notes on the fossil crinoid genus Homocrinus Hall. U.S. National Museum Proceedings, 46:473–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meek, F. 1873. Descriptions of invertebrate fossils of the Silurian and Devonian Systems. Report of the Geological Survey of Ohio, Vol. 1, Pt. II, 246 p.Google Scholar
Mehrtens, C., Poland, J., and Barnett, S. 1981. Rhythmic sedimentations in the Trenton Group limestone (Mid. Ord.) in New York. Geological Society of America, Abstracts With Programs, 13:166.Google Scholar
Miller, J. S. 1821. A Natural History of the Crinoidea or Lily-Shaped Animals, with Observations on the Genera Asteria, Euryale, Comatula, and Marsupites. Bryan & Co., Bristol, 150 p.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A. 1889. North American Geology and Paleontology. Western Methodist Book Concern, Cincinnati, 664 p.Google Scholar
Moore, R. C., and Laudon, L. R. 1943. Evolution and classification of Paleozoic crinoids. Geological Society of America Special Paper 46, 153 p.Google Scholar
Rodgers, J. 1971. The Taconic Orogeny. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 82:1141–1178.Google Scholar
Ross, R., and Bergstrom, S. M., (eds.). 1982. The Ordovician System in the United States. International Union of Geological Sciences, Special Publication 12, 73 p.Google Scholar
Titus, R. 1974. Fossil communities and paleoecology of the medial Ordovician Kings Falls and Sugar River limestones (Trenton Group) of northwestern and central New York. Unpubl. , Boston University, Boston, 249 p.Google Scholar
Titus, R., and Cameron, B. W. 1976. Fossil communities of the lower Trenton Group (Middle Ordovician) of central and northwestern New York State. Journal of Paleontology, 56:1209–1225.Google Scholar
Titus, R., 1982a. Fossil communities of the middle Trenton Group (Ordovician) of New York State. Journal of Paleontology, 56:477–485.Google Scholar
Titus, R., 1982b. Fossil communities, paleoecology and tectonic history of the Trenton Group of central New York State, p. B.1–B.34. In Globensky, Y. (ed.), Field Trips Guidebook, North American Paleontological Convention.Google Scholar
Titus, R., 1986. Fossil communities of the upper Trenton Group (Ordovician) of New York State. Journal of Paleontology, 60:805–824.Google Scholar
Titus, R., 1988. Facies of the Trenton Group. Studies in Geology, American Association of Petroleum Geologists, in press.Google Scholar
Ulrich, E. 1924. New classification of the “Heterocrinidae.” Canadian Geological Survey Memoir 138:82–105.Google Scholar
Wachsmuth, C., and Springer, F. 1885. Revision of the Palaeocrinoidea, Pt. 3, Sec. 1, Discussion of the classification and relations of the brachiate crinoids, and conclusion of the generic descriptions. Academy of the Natural Sciences Philadelphia, Proceedings, p. 223–364.Google Scholar
Warn, J. and Strimple, H. L. 1977. The disparid inadunate super-families Homocrinacea and Cincinnaticrinacea (Echinodermata: Crinoidea), Ordovician–Silurian, North America. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 72, 138 p.Google Scholar