Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T16:51:53.017Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cenozoic Strombidae, Aporrhaidae, and Struthiolariidae (Gastropoda: Stromboidea) from Chile: Their significance to the interpretation of Southeast Pacific Biogeography and climate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Sven N. Nielsen
Sven N. Nielsen*
Affiliation:
Geologisch-Paläontologisches Institut und Museum, Universität Hamburg, Bundesstrasse 55, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany Freie Universität Berlin, Institut für geologische Wissenschaften, Fachrichtung Paläontolgie, Malteserstrasse 74–100, D-12249 Berlin, Germany,
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The stromboid fauna from Cenozoic deposits of Chile contains an unusual mixture of warm-water and cool-water taxa, showing relationships with either Argentinian or New Zealand taxa. Six species of Strombidae, Aporrhaidae, and Struthiolariidae are described, and their relationships and paleobiogeographic implications are discussed. Conus medinae Philippi, 1887 from the Miocene Navidad Formation is assigned to the genus Strombus and thereby constitutes the first record of Strombidae from southwestern South America. The new subgenus Austrombus is proposed for smooth species of Strombus without any spines or axial sculpture. Hemichenopus araucanus (Philippi, 1887) from the ?Eocene of Peninsula Arauco shows strong affinities to Dicroloma zelandica Marshall, 1919 from the Eocene of New Zealand, which is here assigned to Hemichenopus. The New Zealand species Perissoptera (Hemichenopus) thomsoni Allan, 1926 does not belong in Hemichenopus but could not be reassigned to another aporrhaid genus. Struthiochenopus bandeli n. sp. and Struthiochenopus philippii Zinsmeister and Griffin, 1995 are reported from deepwater facies in Chile, rather than the nearshore facies favored by congeners in Argentina. Perissodonta ameghinoi (Ihering, 1897) and Perissodonta chilensis (Philippi, 1887) are the only species of this genus in the eastern Pacific, the former being an Atlantic species, reported for the first time from the Pacific. The term Neo-Weddellian is proposed for Miocene taxa having their origin in the Late Cretaceous–Paleogene Weddellian Province.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 79 , Issue 6 , November 2005 , pp. 1120 - 1130
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, T. A. 1960. The genus Strombus in the Indopacific. Indo-Pacific Mollusca, 1(2):33–146.Google Scholar
Abbott, T. A. 1974. American Seashells, the Marine Mollusca of the Atlantic and Pacific Coast of North America (second edition). Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 663 p.Google Scholar
Allan, R. S. 1926. Fossil Mollusca from the Waihao Greensands. Transactions of the New Zealand Institute, 56:338–346.Google Scholar
Bellardi, L. 1839. Borsonia, nouveau genre de coquille fossile. Bulletin de la Société géologique de France, 10:30–31.Google Scholar
Beu, A. G., and Maxwell, P. A. 1990. Cenozoic Mollusca of New Zealand. New Zealand Geological Survey Paleontological Bulletin, 58, 518 p.Google Scholar
Beu, A. G., Griffin, M., and Maxwell, P. A. 1997. Opening of Drake Passage gateway and Late Miocene to Pleistocene cooling reflected in Southern Ocean molluscan dispersal: Evidence from New Zealand and Argentina. Tectonophysics, 281:83–97.Google Scholar
Bieler, R., and Petit, R. E. 1996. Additional notes on nomina first introduced by Tetsuaki Kira in “Coloured Illustrations of the Shells of Japan.” Malacologia, 38:33–34.Google Scholar
Borchert, A. 1901. Die Molluskenfauna und das Alter der Parana-Stufe. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie. Geologie und Paläontologie, 14:171–245.Google Scholar
Conrad, T. 1860. Descriptions of new species of Cretaceous and Eocene fossils of Mississippi and Alabama. Journal of the Philadelphia Academy of Sciences, 2(4):279–296.Google Scholar
Covacevich, V., Frassinetti, D., and Alfaro, G. 1992. Paleontología y condiciones de depositación del Mioceno marino en las nacientes del Río Futa, Valdivia, Chile. Boletín del Museo Nacional de Historia Natural de Chile, 43:143–154.Google Scholar
Dall, W. H. 1889. Reports on the results of dredging, under the supervision of Alexander Agassiz, in the Gulf of Mexico (1877–78) and in the Caribbean Sea (1879–80), by the U.S. coast survey steamer “Blake”… XXIX. Report on the Mollusca. Part II. Gastropoda and Scaphopoda. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard College, 18:1–492.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. 1846. Geological Observations on South America. Smith, Elder, London, 279 p.Google Scholar
del Río, C. J. 1998. Moluscos marinos Miocenos de la Argentina y del Uruguay. Monografías de la Academia Nacional de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales, Buenos Aires, 15, 151 p.Google Scholar
deVries, T. J. 2004. Eocene Mollusks from the Pisco Basin (southern Peru): Evidence for re-evaluating the age of the Otuma Formation. XII Congreso Peruano de Geología, Lima, Peru, 26–29 October 2004.Google Scholar
deVries, T. J., and Frassinetti, D. 2003. Range extensions and biogeographic implications of Chilean Neogene mollusks. Boletín del Museo Nacional de Historia Natural de Chile, 52:119–135.Google Scholar
d'Orbigny, A. D. 1840. Voyage dans l'Amérique Méridionale, Volume 3, No. 3 (Mollusques). Levrault, Paris, p. 409–488.Google Scholar
d'Orbigny, A. D. 1842. Voyage dans l'Amerique Méridionale. Vol. 3, No. 4 (Paléontologie). Pitois-Levrault, Paris, 187 p.Google Scholar
Finger, K., Encinas, A., Nielsen, S., and Peterson, D. 2003. Micro-faunal indications of late Miocene deep-water basins off the central coast of Chile. 10° Congreso Geolögico Chileno. Concepciön, Chile. Extended abstracts (CD-ROM), 8 p.Google Scholar
Finlay, H. J., and Marwick, J. 1937. The Wangaloan and associated molluscan faunas of Kaitangata-Green Island Subdivision. New Zealand Geological Survey Palaeontological Bulletin, 15, 140 p.Google Scholar
Fischer, P. 1880–1887. Manuel de conchyliologie et de paléontologie conchyliologique, ou histoire naturelle des mollusques vivants et fossils. Librairie F. Savy, Paris, 1369 p.Google Scholar
Fischer von Waldheim, G. 1807. Muséum-Demidoff. Mis en Ordre Systématique et Descrit Par G. Fischer, Volume 3. Végétaux et Animaux. Moscow, Université Impériau, 330 p.Google Scholar
Fleming, C. A. 1966. Marwick's illustrations of New Zealands shells with a checklist of New Zealand Cenozoic Mollusca. New Zealand Department of Scientific and Industrial Research Bulletin, 173, 456 p.Google Scholar
Frassinetti, D., and Covacevich, V. 1993. Bivalvos del Mioceno de Matanzas (Formación Navidad, Chile Central). Boletín del Museo Nacional de Historia Natural de Chile, 44:73–97.Google Scholar
Frassinetti, D., and Covacevich, V. 1999. Invertebrados fósiles marinos de la Formación Guadal (Oligoceno Superior-Mioceno Inferior) en Pampa Castillo, Región de Aysén, Chile. Servicio Nacional de Geología y Minería Boletín, 51, 96 p.Google Scholar
Gabb, W. M. 1868. An attempt at a revision of the two families, Strombidae and Aporrhaidae. American Journal of Conchology, 4:137–149.Google Scholar
García, F. 1968. Estratigrafía del Terciario de Chile Central, p. 25–57. In Cecioni, G. (ed.), Symposio sobre el Terciario de Chile, Zona Central. Andres Bello, Santiago.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E. 1840. Mollusca, p. 86–89, 106–156. In Synopsis of the Contents of the British Museum (forty-second edition). G. Woodfall and Son, London.Google Scholar
Groves, L. T., and Nielsen, S. N. 2003. A new late Miocene Zonaria (Gastropoda: Cypraeidae) from central Chile. The Veliger, 46:351–354.Google Scholar
Harris, G. F. 1897. Catalogue of Tertiary Mollusca in the Department of Geology, British Museum (Natural History). Pt. 1. The Australasian Tertiary Mollusca. British Museum of Natural History, London, 407 p., 8 pls.Google Scholar
Herm, D. 1969. Marines Pliozän und Pleistozän in Nord- und Mittel-Chile unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Entwicklung der Mollusken-Faunen. Zitteliana, 2, 159 p.Google Scholar
Ibaraki, M. 1992. Planktonic Foraminifera from the Navidad Formation, Chile: Their geologic age and paleoceanographic implications, p. 91–95. In Ishizaki, K. and Saito, T. (eds.), Centenary of Japanese Micropaleontology. Terra Scientific, Tokyo.Google Scholar
Ihering, H. 1897. Os Molluscos dos terrenos terciarios da Patagonia. Revista do Museu Paulista, 2:217–382.Google Scholar
Ihering, H. 1909. Nouvelles recherches sur la Formation Magellanienne. Anales del Museo Nacional, Buenos Aires, serie 3, 12:27–43.Google Scholar
Jousseaume, F. P. 1884. Étude sur la famille des Cypraeidae. Bulletin de la Société Zoologique de France, 9:81–100.Google Scholar
Jousseaume, F. P. 1886. Coquilles marines des côtes d'Abessinie et de Zanzibar, recueilis par M. Raffray en 1873 et en 1874. Le Naturaliste, 1886:220–222.Google Scholar
Jung, P. 1965. Miocene Mollusca from the Paraguana Peninsula, Venezuela. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 49:385–652.Google Scholar
Jung, P., and Heitz, A. 2001. The subgenus Lentigo (Gastropoda: Strombidae) in tropical America, fossil and living. The Veliger, 44:20–53.Google Scholar
Keen, A. M. 1971. Sea Shells of Tropical West America: Marine Mollusks from Baja California to Peru (second edition). Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, 1,064 p.Google Scholar
Kiel, S. 2002. Notes on the biogeography of Campanian–Maastrichtian gastropods, p. 109–127. In Wagreich, M. (ed.), Aspects of Cretaceous Stratigraphy and Palaeobiogeography. Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Schriftenreihe der Erdwissenschaftlichen Kommissionen, 15.Google Scholar
Kiel, S., and Bandel, K. 2002. About some aporrhaid and strombid gastropods from the Late Cretaceous. Paläontologische Zeitschrift, 76:83–97.Google Scholar
Kira, T. 1955. Coloured Illustrations of the Shells of Japan. Hoikusha, Osaka, 204 p.Google Scholar
Kraus, O. 2000. Internationale Regeln für die zoologische Nomenklatur. Abhandlungen des naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins in Hamburg, n.f., 34, 232 p.Google Scholar
Kronenberg, G. C. 1991. The Recent species of the family Aporrhaidae. Vita Marina, 41:47–58.Google Scholar
le Roux, J. P., and Elgueta, S. 2000. Sedimentologic development of a Late Oligocene–Miocene forearc embayment, Valdivia Basin Complex, southern Chile. Sedimentary Geology, 130:27–44.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, J. R. 1786. A catalogue of the Portland Museum, lately the property of the Duchess Dowager of Portland, deceased, which will be sold by auction, by Mr. Skinner and co. on Monday the 24th of April, 1786. Skinner, London, 194 p.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. 1758. Systema Naturae per Regna Triae Naturae (editio decima, reformata). Tomus 1. Holmiae, Laurentii Salvii, Stockholm, 823 p.Google Scholar
Marshall, P. 1919. Fauna of the Hampden beds and classification of the Oamaru System. Transactions of the New Zealand Institute, 51:226–250.Google Scholar
Marshall, P., and Murdoch, R. 1920. Some Tertiary Mollusca, with descriptions of new species. Transactions of the New Zealand Institute, 52:128–136.Google Scholar
Martens, E. 1878. Einige Conchylien aus den kälteren Meeresgegenden der südlichen Erdhälfte. Sitzungsbericht der Gesellschaft naturforschender Freunde zu Berlin, 1878:20–26.Google Scholar
Marwick, J. 1924. The Struthiolariidae. Transactions and Proceedings of the New Zealand Institute, 55:161–190.Google Scholar
Maxwell, P. A. 1992. Eocene Mollusca from the vicinity of McCulloch's Bridge, Waihao River, South Canterbury, New Zealand: Paleoecology and systematics. Geological Survey Paleontological Bulletin, 65, 280 p.Google Scholar
Nielsen, S. N. 2004. The genus Olivancillaria (Gastropoda, Olividae) in the Miocene of Chile: Rediscovery of an older species name and description of a new species. The Nautilus, 118:88–92.Google Scholar
Nielsen, S. N., and Bandel, K. 2003. Species migration in the Miocene Pacific–paleobiogeographic and paleoclimatic implications from Chilean gastropods. Abstracts 18. Geowissenschaftliches Lateinamerika Kolloquium, Freiberg. Terra Nostra, 2/2003:55.Google Scholar
Nielsen, S. N., and DeVries, T. J. 2002. Tertiary Xenophoridae of western South America. The Nautilus, 116:71–78.Google Scholar
Nielsen, S. N., Frassinetti, D., and Bandel, K. 2004. Miocene Vetigastropoda and Neritimorpha (Mollusca, Gastropoda) of Central Chile. Journal of South American Earth Sciences, 17:73–88.Google Scholar
Nielsen, S. N., DeVries, T. J., Encinas, A., Finger, K. L., and Peterson, D. 2003. Towards an understanding of the age of the Navidad Formation. 10° Congreso Geológico Chileno. Concepción, Chile. Extended abstracts (CD-ROM), 7 p.Google Scholar
Olsson, A. A. 1928. Contributions to the Tertiary paleontology of northern Peru, Pt. 1, Eocene Mollusca and Brachiopoda. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 14:47–154.Google Scholar
Olsson, A. A. 1931. Contributions to the Tertiary paleontology of northern Peru, Pt. 4, The Peruvian Oligocene. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 17, number 63, 124 p.Google Scholar
Ortmann, A. E. 1902. Tertiary invertebrates. Reports of the Princeton Expedition to Patagonia, 1896–1899, 4, Palaeontology, Pt. 2:45–332.Google Scholar
Parodiz, J. J. 1996. The taxa of fossil Mollusca introduced by Hermann von Ihering. Annals of Carnegie Museum, 65:183–296.Google Scholar
Philippi, R. A. 1836. Enumeratio Molluscorum Siciliæ cum viventium tum in Tellure Tertiaria Fossilium quae in itinere suo observavit. Berolini sumptibus Simonis Schroppii et Sociorum, 267 p.Google Scholar
Philippi, R. A. 1887. Die tertiären und quartären Versteinerungen Chiles. F.A. Brockhaus, Leipzig, 266 p.Google Scholar
Ponder, W. F. 1983. Xenophoridae of the world. The Australian Museum Memoir, 17, 126 p.Google Scholar
Powell, A. W. B. 1951. Antarctic and subantarctic Mollusca: Pelecypoda and Gastropoda. Discovery Reports, 26, 128 p.Google Scholar
Rafinesque, C. S. 1815. Analyses de la Nature, ou Tableau de l'univers et des Corps Organisées. Barraveccia, Palermo, 224 p.Google Scholar
Schumacher, H. C. F. 1817. Essais d'un Nuveau Système des Habitations des Vers Testacés. Schultz, Copenhagen, 287 p.Google Scholar
Smith, E. A. 1875. Descriptions of some new shells from Kerguelen's Island. The Annals and Magazine of Natural History, series 4, 14:67–73.Google Scholar
Sowerby, G. B. 1825. A Catalogue of the Shells Contained in the Collection of the Late Earl of Tankerville. London, 92 p. and 34 p., appendix.Google Scholar
Steinmann, G., and Wilckens, O. 1908. Kreide-und Tertiärfossilien aus den Magellansländern gesammelt von der schwedischen Expedition 1895–1897. Arkiv för Zoologi, 4(6), 119 p.Google Scholar
Stilwell, J. D., and Zinsmeister, W. J. 1992. Molluscan systematics and biostratigraphy, lower tertiary La Meseta Formation, Seymour Island, Antarctic Peninsula. American Geophysical Union, Antarctic Research Series, 55:1–192.Google Scholar
Tavera, J. 1979. Estratigrafía y paleontología de la Formación Navidad, Provincia de Colchagua, Chile (Lat. 30°50'–34°S). Boletín del Museo Nacional de Historia Natural de Chile, 36, 176 p.Google Scholar
Tsuchi, R., Shuto, T., Takayama, T., Koizumi, I., Fujiyoshi, A., Ibaraki, M., and Martínez-Pardo, R. 1990. Fundamental data on Cenozoic biostratigraphy of Chile-Supplement 3. Punta Perro section north of Navidad, central Chile. Reports of Andean Studies, Special Volume 3:70–71.Google Scholar
Villablanca, D. V. 2001. Geología y petrología del carbón: Yacimiento Carbonífero Mulpún, Provincia de Valdivia, X Región de Los Lagos, Chile. Unpublished , , 156 p.Google Scholar
Wilckens, O. 1910. Die Anneliden, Bivalven und Gastropoden der Antarktischen Kreideformation. Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse der Schwedischen Südpolar-Expedition 1901–1903, 3(12), 132 p.Google Scholar
Woodring, W. P. 1957–1982. Geology and paleontology of Canal Zone and adjoining parts of Panama. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 306 A-F, 759 p.Google Scholar
Woods, H. 1922. Mollusca from Eocene and Miocene deposits of Peru, p. 51–113. In Bosworth, T. O. (ed.), Geology of the Tertiary and Quaternary Periods in the Northern Part of Peru. Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Zinsmeister, W. J. 1979. Biogeographic significance of the Late Mesozoic and Early Tertiary molluskan faunas of Seymour Island (Antarctic Peninsula) to the final breakup of Gondwanaland, p. 344–347. In Gray, J. and Boucot, A. J. (eds.), Historical Biogeography, Plate Tectonics and Changing Environments. 37th Biological Colloquium. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis.Google Scholar
Zinsmeister, W. J., and Camacho, H. H. 1980. Late Eocene Struthiolariidae (Mollusca: Gastropoda) from Seymour Island, Antarctic Peninsula and their significance to the biogeography of Early Tertiary shallow-water faunas of the Southern Hemisphere. Journal of Paleontology, 54:1–14.Google Scholar
Zinsmeister, W. J., and Griffin, M. 1995. Late Cretaceous and Tertiary aporrhaid gastropods from the southern rim of the Pacific Ocean. Journal of Paleontology, 69:692–702.Google Scholar