Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T16:20:32.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Campanian and Maastrichtian hippuritid rudists (Hippuritida, Bivalvia) of the Chiapas Central Depression (southern Mexico) and implications for American multiple-fold hippuritid taxonomy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Jose Maria Pons
Affiliation:
Departament de Geologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, E-08193 Bellaterra, Spain
Enric Vicens
Affiliation:
Departament de Geologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, E-08193 Bellaterra, Spain
Pedro García-Barrera
Affiliation:
Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico

Abstract

Hippuritids, particularly those with multiple-folds, are one of the most characteristic components in uppermost Cretaceous rudist-bearing strata of the Caribbean Province. The hippuritid rudist fauna of the Chiapas Central Depression includes the following taxa: Vaccinites vermunti Mac Gillavry, 1937 and Barrettia cf. B. ruseae Chubb, 1967 from the early Campanian Suchiapa Formation; B. monilifera Woodward, 1862, B. gigas Chubb, 1955, and Parastroma trechmanni Chubb, 1967 from the mid Campanian Suchiapa Formation; and Praebarrettia sparcilirata (Whitfield, 1897) from the early Maastrichtian Ocozocoautla Formation. These six species are described herein in detail. New observations on the outer shell layer structure of the right valve and the pore-canal system of the left valve led to amending the diagnoses of the g|enera Barrettia Woodward, 1862, Parastroma Douvillé, 1926, and Praebarrettia Trechmann, 1924. Also, the revision of Chiapas’ and other American species of multiple-fold hippuritids led to proposed changes in their generic adscription.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2018, The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adkins, W.S., 1930, New rudistids from the Texas and Mexican Cretaceous: The University of Texas Bulletin, no. 3001, p. 77–100, 122133.Google Scholar
Alencáster, G., 1971, Rudistas del Cretácico Superior de Chiapas. Parte 1: Paleontología Mexicana, no. 34, p. 191, 24 pls.Google Scholar
Alencáster, G., 1990, Los rudistas: Origen, diversificación, provincialismo en Eurasia y en América y extinción: Revista de la Sociedad Mexicana de Paleontología, v. 3, p. 4765.Google Scholar
Alencáster, G., and Michaud, F., 1991, Rudistas (Bivalvia-Hippuritacea) del Cretácico superior de la región de Tuxla Gutiérrez, Chiapas (México): Actas Facultad de Ciencias de la Tierra, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, v. 4, p. 175193.Google Scholar
Alencáster, G., and Pons, J.M., 1992, New observations on the Upper Cretaceous rudists of Chiapas: Comparison between American and European faunas and taxonomic implications: Geologica Romana, v. 28, p. 327339.Google Scholar
Barrande, J., 1881, Système Silurien du Centre de la Bohème, Première Partie, Recherches Paléontologiques, Volume 6, Classe des Mollusques Acéphalés: Prague and Paris, J. Barrande, 24 + 342 p.Google Scholar
Bilotte, M., 1981, Proposition pour une classification des rudistes Hippuritidae: Bulletin de la Société d'Histoire Naturelle de Toulouse, v. 117, p. 103116.Google Scholar
Böse, E., 1906, La fauna de moluscos del Senoniano de Cárdenas, San Luis Potosí: Boletín del Instituto Geológico de México, no. 24, p. 561.Google Scholar
Boissevain, H., and Mac Gillavry, H.J., 1932, Some remarks on Barrettia sparcilirata Whitfield and Chiapasella radiolitiformis (Trechmann): Koninklijke Akademie van Wetenschappen te Amsterdam, Proceedings of the Section of Sciences, v. 35, p. 13031312.Google Scholar
Bronn, H.G., 1831, Hippurites, in Ersch, J.S., and Gruber, J.G., eds., Allgemeine Encyclopaedie der Wissenschaften und Künste, Zweite Section, Achter Theil: Leipzig, Brockhaus, p. 371376.Google Scholar
Chubb, L.J., 1955, A revision of Whitfield's type specimens of the rudist mollusks from the Cretaceous of Jamaica, British West Indies: American Museum Novitates, no. 1713, p. 115.Google Scholar
Chubb, L.J., 1956, Rudist assemblages of the Antillean Upper Cretaceous: Bulletin of American Paleontology, v. 37, p. 123.Google Scholar
Chubb, L.J., 1967, New rudists species from the Cretaceous rocks of Jamaica: Journal of the Geological Society of Jamaica, v. 9, p. 2431.Google Scholar
Chubb, L.J., 1971, Rudists of Jamaica: Paleontographica Americana, v. 7, p. 161257.Google Scholar
Dechaseaux, C., and Coogan, A.H., 1969, Family Hippuritidae Gray, 1848, in Moore, R.C., ed., Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part N, Mollusca 6, Bivalvia 2: Boulder, Colorado, and Lawrence, Kansas, Geological Society of America (and University of Kansas Press), p. N799N803.Google Scholar
Defrance, I.L.M., 1821, Dictionnaire des Sciences Naturelles, Volume 21: Paris, Le Normant, 540 p.Google Scholar
Douvillé, H., 1894, Études sur les Rudistes: Révision des principales espèces d’Hippurites: Mémoires de la Société Géologique de France, Paléontologie, v. 4, p. 95138 (Mémoire 6).Google Scholar
Douvillé, H., 1926, Quelques fossiles du Crétacé supérieur de Cuba: Bulletin de la Societé Géologique de France, ser. 4, v. 26, p. 127138.Google Scholar
Douvillé, H., 1927, Nouveau rudistes du Crétacé de Cuba: Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France, ser. 4, v. 27, p. 4956.Google Scholar
Egorova, L.I., and Savitsky, V.E., 1968, [Trilobites from the Maya Stage of the northern Siberian Platform]: Paleontologicheskiy Zhurnal, v. 1968, p. 5870 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Fischer, P., 1880–1887, Manuel de Conchyliologie et de Paléontologie Conchyliologique ou Histoire Naturelle des Mollusques Vivants et Fossiles, 3 volumes, 11 parts: Paris, Librairie F. Savy, 1369 p.Google Scholar
García-Barrera, P., Avendaño Gil, J., Omaña, L., and Alencáster, G., 1998, Antillocaprina trilobata nov. sp. and Upper Cretaceous associated fauna from Chiapas, southeast Mexico, in Masse, J.-P., and Skelton, P.W., eds., Quatrième Congrès International sur les Rudistes: Geobios, Mémoire Spécial, n. 22, p. 126135.Google Scholar
Gerth, H., 1928, Neue Faunen aus Hippuriten der Oberen Kreide mit Hippuriten aus Nordperu: Leidse Geologische Mededeelingen, v. 2, no. 4, p. 231241.Google Scholar
Götz, S., and Mitchell, S., 2009, The Laluzia armini (gen. et spec. nov.) ecosystem: Understanding a deeper-water rudist lithosome from the early Maastrichtian of Mexico: Facies, v. 55, p. 539551, doi:10.1007/s10347-009-0184-6Google Scholar
Goldfuss, A., 1840, Petrefacta Germaniae, Part 2, Lief. 7: Düsseldorf, Germany, Lithographische Anstalt Arnz, p. 225312.Google Scholar
Gray, J.E., 1848, On the arrangement of the Brachiopoda: Annals and Magazine of Natural History, v. 2, p. 435440.Google Scholar
Grubić, A., 2004, Revision of the rudists subfamily Barrettinae Chubb: Bulletin de l'Académie Serbe des Sciences et des Arts, v. 128 (Classe des Sciences Mathématiques et Naturelles, Sciences Naturelles, v. 42), p. 139197.Google Scholar
Lamarck, J.B., 1801. Système des Animaux sans Vertèbres, ou Tableau Général des Classes, des Ordres et des Genres des Animaux, Volume 1: Paris, 432 p.Google Scholar
Lupu, D., 1975, Faune sénonienne à rudistes de la province de Pinar del Río (Cuba): Dări de Seamă ale Şedinţelor, v. 61 (1973–1974), p. 223254.Google Scholar
Mac Gillavry, H.J., 1932, The rudist fauna of Seroe Teintje limestone (northern Curaçao): Proceedings Koninklijke Akademie van Wetenschappen te Amsterdam, v. 35, p. 381392.Google Scholar
Mac Gillavry, H.J., 1937, Geology of the province of Camaguey, Cuba, with revisional studies in rudist paleontology [Ph. D. dissertation]: The Netherlands, University of Utrecht, 168 p.Google Scholar
Meneghini, G., 1868, Il nuovo genere Pironaea: Atti della Societa Italiana di Science Naturali, v. 11, p. 402.Google Scholar
Mitchell, S.F., 2010, Revision of three large species of Barrettia from Jamaica: Caribbean Journal of Earth Science, v. 41, p. 116.Google Scholar
Mitchell, S.F., 2013, Revision of the Antillocaprinidae Mac Gillavry (Hippuritida, Bivalvia) and their position within the Caprinoidea d'Orbigny: Geobios, v. 46, p. 423446, doi:10.1016/j.geobios.2013.07.003.Google Scholar
Mitchell, S.F., and Skelton, P.W., 2013, A new rudist bivalve, Polytorreites gen. nov., from the Campanian of Puerto Rico demonstrating iterative evolution of American multiple-ray Hippuritidae: Caribbean Journal of Earth Science, v. 45, p. 119123.Google Scholar
Müllerried, F.K., 1931a, Chiapasella, un paquiodonto extrañísimo de la América: Anales del Instituto de Biologia UNAM, v. 2, p. 243254.Google Scholar
Müllerried, F.K., 1931b, Sobre una anomalía en las invaginaciones de las valvas de algunas Hippuritidae: Anales del Instituto de Biologia UNAM, v. 2, p. 255261.Google Scholar
Müllerried, F.K., 1933, El género Plagioptychus en México: Anales del Instituto de Biología UNAM, v. 4, p.114.Google Scholar
Müllerried, F.K., 1934, Sobre el hallazgo de paquiodontos gigantescos en el Cretácico de Chiapas: Anales del Instituto de Biología UNAM, v. 5, p. 8182.Google Scholar
Müllerried, F.K., 1936, La edad estratigráfica de la Barrettia y formas cercanas: Anales del Instituto de Biología UNAM, v. 7, p. 155164.Google Scholar
Munujos, H., Pons, J.M., and Vicens, E., 2016, The rudist bivalve Pironaea milovanovici Kühn, 1935, a multiple-fold Hippuritidae, from south-eastern Spain: Taxonomic implications: Pore and canal system constructional morphology: Cretaceous Research, v. 63, p. 122141, doi:10.1016/j.cretres.2016.03.002.Google Scholar
Myers, R. L., 1968, Biostratigraphy of the Cárdenas formation (Upper Cretaceous) San Luis Potosi, Mexico: Paleontologia Mexicana, no. 24, p. 189.Google Scholar
Olsson, A.A., 1934, Contributions to the paleontology of northern Peru: The Cretaceous of the Amotape Region: Bulletins of American Paleontology, v. 20, no 69, p. 1105.Google Scholar
Oviedo, A., 2006, Rudistas del Cretácico superior del centro al sudeste de México (Recuento sistemático de rudistas americanos) [Ph.D. dissertation]: Spain, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 123 p., http://hdl.handle.net/10803/3440 (accessed November 2018).Google Scholar
Oviedo, A., Pons, J.M., Pichardo-Barrón, Y., Aguilar-Pérez, J., and Alencáster, G., 2007, Stratigraphical distribution of the hippuritid rudists in the Upper Cretaceous of central Mexico, in Díaz-Martínez, E., and Rábano, I., eds., 4th European Meeting on the Palaeontology and Stratigraphy of Latin America: Cuadernos del Museo Geominero, no. 8, Madrid, Instituto Geológico y Minero de España, p. 309313.Google Scholar
Palmer, R.H., 1933, Nuevos rudistas de Cuba: Revista de Agricultura, Comercio y Trabajo, v. 14, nos. 15–16, p. 95125.Google Scholar
Philip, J., and Jaillard, E., 2004, Revision of the Upper Cretaceous rudists from northwestern Peru: Journal of South American Earth Sciences, v. 17, p. 39–48, doi:10.1016/j.jsames.2004.05.008.Google Scholar
Pons, J.M., Vicens, E., Pichardo, Y., Aguilar, J., Oviedo, A., Alencáster, G., and García-Barrera, P., 2010, A new early Campanian rudist fauna from San Luis Potosí in Mexico and its taxonomic and stratigraphic significance: Journal of Paleontology, v. 84, p. 974995, doi:10.2307/40802062.Google Scholar
Pons, J.M., Vicens, E., Oviedo, A., Aguilar, J., García-Barrera, P., and Alencáster, G., 2013, The rudist fauna of the Cárdenas Formation, Maastrichtian, San Luis Potosí State, Mexico: Journal of Paleontology, v. 87, p. 726754, doi:10.1666/12-116.Google Scholar
Pons, J.M., Vicens, E., Martínez, R., García-Barrera, P., Nieto, I.-E., Oviedo, A., and Avendaño-Gil, M.J., 2016a, The Campanian–Maastrichtian rudist bivalves succession in the Chiapas Central Depression, Mexico: Cretaceous Research, v. 60, p. 210220, doi:10.1016/j.cretres.2015.11.015.Google Scholar
Pons, J.M., Vicens, E., and Schmidt-Effing, R., 2016b, Campanian rudists (Hippuritida, Bivalvia) from Costa Rica (Central America): Journal of Paleontology, v. 90, p. 211238, doi:10.1017/jpa.2016.27.Google Scholar
Pons, J.M., Vicens, E., and García-Barrera, P., 2017, Campanian and Maastrichtian plagioptychid rudists (Hippuritida, Bivalvia) of the Chiapas Central Depression, southern Mexico: Journal of Paleontology, v. 91, p. 230244, doi:10.1017/jpa.2016.153.Google Scholar
Sénesse, P., 1946, Variations et classifications chez les Hippurites pyrénéens. Bulletin de la Société d'Histoire Naturelle de Toulouse, v. 81, p. 1774.Google Scholar
Steuber, T., 2002, Web catalogue of the Hippuritoidea (rudist bivalves): http://www.paleotax.de/rudists/index.htm (accessed November 2018).Google Scholar
Thiadens, A., 1936, Rudistids from southern Santa Clara, Cuba: Koninklijke Akademie van Wetenschappen te Amsterdam, Proceedings, v. 39, p. 10101019.Google Scholar
Toucas, A., 1904, Études sur la classification et l’évolution des Hippurites, deuxième partie: Mémoires de la Société Géologique de France, Paléontologie, no. 30, v. 12, p. 65128.Google Scholar
Trechmann, C.T., 1922, The Barrettia beds of Jamaica: Geological Magazine, v. 59, p. 501514.Google Scholar
Trechmann, C.T., 1924, The Cretaceous limestones of Jamaica and their Mollusca: Geological Magazine, v. 61, p. 385410.Google Scholar
van Dommelen, H., 1971, Ontogenetic, phylogenetic and taxonomic studies of the American species of Pseudovaccinites and of Torreites and the multiple-fold hippuritids [Ph. D. dissertation]: The Netherlands, University of Amsterdam, 125 p.Google Scholar
Vermunt, L.V., 1937, Cretaceous rudistids of Pinar del Rio Province, Cuba: Journal of Paleontology, v. 11, p. 261265.Google Scholar
Whitfield, R.P., 1897a, Descriptions of species of Rudistae from the Cretaceous rocks of Jamaica: Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, v. 9, p. 185196.Google Scholar
Whitfield, R.P., 1897b, Observations on the genus Barrettia Woodward, with descriptions of two new species: Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, v. 9, p. 233246.Google Scholar
Woodward, S.P., 1862, Some account of Barrettia, a new and remarkable fossil shell from the Hippurite limestone of Jamaica: The Geologist, October 1862, p. 1–8.Google Scholar