Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T02:44:57.446Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An endemic cephalopod assemblage from the lower Campanian (Late Cretaceous) Parras Shale, western Coahuila, Mexico

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Christina Ifrim ,
Wolfgang Stinnesbeck  and
José Flores Ventura
Christina Ifrim
Affiliation:
Geowissenschaftliches Institut, Universität Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 234, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany,
Wolfgang Stinnesbeck
Affiliation:
Geowissenschaftliches Institut, Universität Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 234, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany,
José Flores Ventura
Affiliation:
Santa Engracia 257, Fracc. Santa Elena, Saltillo C.P. 25015, Coahuila, México
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The cephalopods from Union y Progreso represent the first fossil assemblage described from the Parras Shale in Coahuila, Mexico. Pseudoschloenbachia (Pseudoschloenbachia) aff. P. (P.) mexicana (Renz, 1936), P. (P.) mexicana (Renz, 1936), Baculites haresi Reeside, 1927, and Menabites (Delawarella) vanuxemi (Morton, 1830) have a geographically restricted occurrence. Didymoceras juv. sp., Menuites juv. sp., Polyptychoceras juv. sp., Pseudoxybeloceras (Parasolenoceras) juv. sp., and Scaphites sp. ex gr. S. hippocrepis (DeKay, 1828) are represented by juveniles and could not be determined to species level. Desmophyllites diphylloides (Forbes, 1846) is the only long-ranging, cosmopolitan species described from this assemblage. Three new species are described: Eutrephoceras irritilasi n. sp., Hypophylloceras (Neophylloceras) arturoi n. sp., and Tetragonites silencioensis n. sp. The morphotype Baculites n. sp. is also inferred to be distinct. The faunal composition of this assemblage indicates a late early Campanian age. This assemblage shows a high degree of endemism. The causes for this endemism are currently unknown and difficult to assess. Nevertheless, the generic composition of the Union y Progreso ammonite assemblage suggests a short-term early Campanian endemic event.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 87 , Issue 5 , September 2013 , pp. 881 - 901
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adkins, W. S. 1929. Some upper Taylor ammonites from Texas. University of Texas Bulletin, 2901:203–211.Google Scholar
Agassiz, A. 1848. Nomenclatoris Zoologici Index Universalis continens nomina systematics classium, familiarum et generum animalium omnium, tam viventium quam fossilim, segundum ordinem alphabeticum unicum disposita, adjectis homonymiis plantarum I-X. Jent and Gassmann, Solothurn, 1355p.Google Scholar
Arkell, W. J. 1950. A classification of the Jurassic ammonites. Journal of Paleontology, 24:354–364.Google Scholar
Becker, M. A., Slattery, W., and Chamberlain, J. A. Jr. 1998. Mixing of Santonian and Campanian chondrichthyan and ammonite macrofossils along a transgressive lag deposit, Greene County, western Alabama. Southeastern Geology, 37:205–216.Google Scholar
Birkelund, T. 1965. Ammonites from the Upper Cretaceous of West Greenland. Meddeleser om Gr⊘nland, 179:1–192.Google Scholar
de Blainville, H. M. D.1825–1827. Manuel de Malacologie et de conchyliologie. Levrault, Paris, 664 p. (1825).Google Scholar
Cobban, W. A. 1958. Two new species of Baculites from the Western Interior region. Journal of Paleontology, 32:660–665.Google Scholar
Cobban, W. A. 1962a. Baculites from the lower part of the Pierre Shale and equivalent rocks in the Western Interior. Journal of Paleontology, 36:704–718.Google Scholar
Cobban, W. A. 1962b. New Baculites from the Bearpaw Shale and equivalent rocks of the Western Interior. Journal of Paleontology, 36:126–135.Google Scholar
Cobban, W. A. 1969. The Late Cretaceous ammonites Scaphites leei Reeside and Scaphites hippocrepis (DeKay) in the Western Interior of the United States. United States Geological Survey Professional Paper, 619:1–17.Google Scholar
Cobban, W. A. 1977. A new curved baacilite form the Upper Cretaceous of Wyoming. United States Geological Survey Journal of Research, 5:457–462.Google Scholar
Cobban, W. A. 1993. Diversity and distribution of Late Cretaceous ammonites, Western Interior, United States, p. 435–451. InCaldwell, W. G. E. and Kauffman, E. G.(ed.), Evolution of the Western Interior Basin. Geological Association of Canada Special Paper, Volume 39.Google Scholar
Cobban, W. A. 2008. Upper Cretaceous mollusscan record along a transect from Virden, New Mexico, to Del Rio, Texas. New Mexico Geology, 30:75–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobban, W. A. and Kennedy, W. J. 1992a. Campanian ammonites from the Upper Cretaceous Gober Chalk of Lamar County, Texas. Journal of Paleontology, 66:440–454.Google Scholar
Cobban, W. A. and Kennedy, W. J. 1992b. Campanian Trachyscaphites spiniger ammonite fauna in north-east Texas. Palaeontology, 35:63–93.Google Scholar
Cobban, W. A. and Kennedy, W. J. 1993a. Middle Campanian ammonites and inoceramids from the Wolfe City Sand in northeastern Texas. Journal of Paleontology, 67:71–82.Google Scholar
Cobban, W. A. and Kennedy, W. J. 1993b. Upper Cretaceous ammonites from the Coon Creek Tongue of the Ripley Formation at its type locality in McNairy County, Tennessee. United States Geological Survey Bulletin, 2073:B1–B12.Google Scholar
Cobban, W. A., Walaszczyk, I., Obradovich, J. D., and McKinney, K. C. 2006. A USGS zonal table for the Upper Cretaceous middle Cenomanian–Maastrichtian of the Western Interior of the United States based on ammonites, inoceramids and radiometric ages. United States Geological Survey Open File Report, 2006–1250:1–47.Google Scholar
Collignon, M. 1948. Ammonites néocrétacées du Menabe (Madagascar). I. Les Texanitidae. Annales Geologiques du Service des Mines, Madagascar, 13:47–107.Google Scholar
Collignon, M. 1969. Atlas des fossiles caractéristiques de Madagascar (Ammonites). Fascicule 15 (Campanien inférieur). Service Géologique, Tananarive, 216p.Google Scholar
DeKay, J. E. 1828. Report on several fossil multilocular shells from the state of Delaware: With observations on a second specimen of the new fossil genus Eurypterus. Annales of the Lyceum of Natural History, 2:273–279.Google Scholar
Forbes, E. 1846. Report on the Cretaceous fossil invertebrates from southern India, collected by Mr. Kaye and Mr. Cunliffe. Transactions of the Geological Society, London (Part 2), 7:97–174.Google Scholar
Gill, T. 1871. Arrangement of the Families of the Mollusks. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 227, xvi+49p.Google Scholar
de Grossouvre, A. 1894. Recherches sur la Craie Supérieure, 2, Paléontologie. Les ammonites de la Craie Supérieure. Imprimerie Nationale, Paris, Mémoirs pour Servir à l'Explication de la Carte géologique détaillée de la France, ii+264p.Google Scholar
Haggart, J. W. 1989. New and revised ammonites from the Upper Cretaceous Nanaimo Group of British Columbia. Geological Survey of Canada Bulletin, 396:181–221.Google Scholar
Henderson, R. A. and McNamara, K. J. 1985. Maastrichtian non-heteromorph ammonites from the Miria Formation, Western Australia. Palaeontology, 28:35–88.Google Scholar
Hyatt, A. 1889. Genesis of the Arietidae, Washington, D.C. Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge, 673, xi+238p.Google Scholar
Hyatt, A. 1894. Phylogeny of an acquired characteristic. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 32:349–647.Google Scholar
Hyatt, A. 1900. Cephalopoda, p. 502–604. Invon Zittel, K. A.(ed.), Textbook of Palaeontology. Macmillan, London and New York.Google Scholar
Ifrim, C., Giersch, S., González González, A. H., Stinnesbeck, W., Frey, E., and López Oliva, J. G. 2010a. Field Guide to Excursion 3. The Vallecillo Platy Limestone and its Fishes. Fifth International Meeting on Mesozoic Fishes Global Diversity and Evolution, Saltillo, Mexico, p. 119–134.Google Scholar
Ifrim, C. and Stinnesbeck, W. 2007. Early Turonian ammonites from Vallecillo, north-eastern Mexico: Taxonomy, biostratigraphy, and palaeobiogeographic significance. Cretaceous Research, 28:642–664.Google Scholar
Ifrim, C. and Stinnesbeck, W. 2008. Cenomanian–Turonian high-resolution biostratigraphy of north-eastern Mexico and its correlation with the GSSP and Europe. Cretaceous Research, 29:943–956.Google Scholar
Ifrim, C. and Stinnesbeck, W. 2010. Migration pathways of the late Campanian and Maastrichtian shallow facies ammonite Sphenodiscus in North America. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 292:96–102.Google Scholar
Ifrim, C. and Stinnesbeck, W.In press. Ammonoids from the Maastrichtian (Late Cretaceous) at El Zancudo, Nuevo Laredo, Tamaulipas, Mexico. Boletin de la Sociedad Geologica Mexicana.Google Scholar
Ifrim, C., Stinnesbeck, W., and Lopez-Oliva, J. G. 2004. Maastrichtian Cephalopods from the Méndez Formation at Cerralvo, Northeastern Mexico. Palaeontology, 47:1575–1627.Google Scholar
Ifrim, C., Stinnesbeck, W., Rodríguez Garza, R. and Ventura, J. F. 2010b. Hemipelagic cephalopods from the Maastrichtian (Late Cretaceous) Parras Basin at La Parra, Coahuila, Mexico, and their implications for the correlation of the lower Difunta Group. Journal of South American Earth Sciences, 29:597–618.Google Scholar
Ifrim, C., Stinnesbeck, W., and Schafhauser, A. 2005. Maastrichtian shallow-water ammonites of northeastern Mexico. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Geológicas, 22:48–64.Google Scholar
Imlay, R. W. 1936. Geology of the western part of the Sierra de Parras. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 47:1091–1152.Google Scholar
Jagt, J. M. W., Walaszczyk, I., Yazykova, E. A., and Zaton, M. 2004. Linking southern Poland and northern Germany: Campanian cephalopods, inoceramid bivalves and echinoids. Acta Geologica Polonica, 54:573–586.Google Scholar
Jones, D. L. 1963. Upper Cretaceous (Campanian and Maastrichtian) ammonites from southern Alaska. United States Geological Survey Professional Paper, 432:1–53.Google Scholar
Kauffman, E. G. 1973. Cretaceous Bivalvia, p. 353–383. InHallam, A.(ed.), Atlas of Paleobiogeography. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Kennedy, J. and Cobban, W. A. 1991. Upper Cretaceous (upper Santonian) Boehmoceras fauna from the Gulf Coast region of the United States. Geological Magazine, 128:167–189.Google Scholar
Kennedy, W. J. 1986. Campanian–Maastrichtian ammonites from northern Aquitaine, France. Special Papers in Palaeontology, 36:1–145.Google Scholar
Kennedy, W. J., Bilotte, M., and Melchior, P. 1995. Ammonite faunas, biostratigraphy and sequence stratigraphy of the Coniacian–Santonian of the Corbières (NE Pyrénées). Bulletin des Centre de Recherches Exploration-Production Elf-Aquitaine, 19:377–499.Google Scholar
Kennedy, W. J. and Cobban, W. A. 1993. Upper Campanian ammonites from the Ozan-Annona Formation boundary in Southwestern Arkansas. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Denmark, 40:115–148.Google Scholar
Kennedy, W. J. and Cobban, W. A. 1994. Upper Campanian ammonites from the Mount Laurel Sand at Biggs Farm, Delaware. Journal of Paleontology, 68:1285–1305.Google Scholar
Kennedy, W. J. and Cobban, W. A. 2001. Campanian (Late Cretaceous) ammonites from the upper part of the Anacacho Limestone in South-Central Texas. Acta Geologica Polonica, 51:15–30.Google Scholar
Kennedy, W. J., Cobban, W. A., and Scott, G. R. 1992. Ammonite correlation of the uppermost Campanian of Western Europe, the U.S. Gulf Coast, Atlantic Seaboard and Western Interior, and the numerical age of the base of the Maastrichtian. Geological Magazine, 129:497–500.Google Scholar
Kennedy, W. J., Crame, J. A., Bengtson, P., and Thomson, M. R. A. 2007. Coniacian ammonites from James Ross Island, Antarctica. Cretaceous Research, 28:509–531.Google Scholar
Kennedy, W. J. and Henderson, R. A. 1992. Non-heteromorph ammonites from the upper Maastrichtian of Pondicherry, south India. Palaeontology, 35:381–442.Google Scholar
Kennedy, W. J. and Klinger, H. C. 1977. Cretaceous faunas from Zululand and Natal, South Africa. The ammonite family Tetragonitidae Hyatt, 1900. Annals of the South African Museum, 73:149–197.Google Scholar
Kennedy, W. J. and Summesberger, H. 1984. Upper Campanian Ammonites from the Gschliefgraben (Ultrahelvetic, Upper Austria). Beiträge zur Paläontologie von Österreich, 11:149–206.Google Scholar
Kennedy, W. J., Walaszczyk, I., and Klinger, H. C. 2008. Cladoceramus (Bivalvia, Inoceramidae)—ammonite associations from the Santonian of KwaZulu, South Africa. Cretaceous Research, 29:267–293.Google Scholar
Klinger, H. C. and Kennedy, W. J. 2001. Stratigraphic and geographic distribution, phyllogenetic trends and general comments on the ammonite family Baculitidae Gill, 1871 (with and annotated list of species regerred to the family). Annals of the South African Museum, 107:1–290.Google Scholar
Kossmat, F. 1895. Untersuchungen über die Südindische Kreideformation. Erster Theil. Beiträge zur Paläontologie Österreich-Ungarns und des Orient, 9:97–203(201–107).Google Scholar
Kossmat, F. 1898. Untersuchungen über die Südindische Kreideformation. Dritter Theil. Beiträge zur Paläontologie Österreich-Ungarns und des Orients, 11:89–152.Google Scholar
Küchler, T. 2000a. Scaphites hippocrepis (Dekay) IV, a new chronological subspecies from the lower-upper Campanian (Upper Cretaceous) boundary interval of northern Spain. Acta Geologica Polonica, 50:161–167.Google Scholar
Küchler, T. 2000b. Upper Cretaceous of the Barranca (Navarra, northern Spain); an integrated litho-, bio- and event stratigraphy. Part II: Campanian and Maastrichtian. Acta Geologica Polonica, 50:441–499.Google Scholar
de Lamarck, J. B. P. A. M. 1799. Prodrome d'une nouvelle classification des coquilles. Mémoirs du Musée de l'Histoire Naturelle, p. 63–90.Google Scholar
Landes, R. W. 1940. Paleontology of the marine formations of the Montana group, pt. 2 of Geology of the southern Alberta plains. Geological Survey of Canada Memoir, 221:129–223.Google Scholar
Larson, N. L. 2012. The late Campanian (Upper Cretaceous) cephalopod fauna of the Coon Creek Formation at the type locality. Journal of Paleontological Sciences, 1:1–68.Google Scholar
Larson, N. L., Jorgensen, S. D., Farrar, R. A., and Larson, P. L. 1997. Ammonites and the Other Cephalopods of the Pierre Seaway: An Identification Guide. Geoscience Press Inc., Tuscon, Arizona, U.S.A.Google Scholar
Maeda, H., Shigeta, Y., Fernando, A. G. S., and Okada, H. 2005. Stratigraphy and fossil assemblages of the Upper Cretaceous System in the Makarov area, southern Sakhalin, Russian Far East. Natural Science Museum Monographs, 31:25–120.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, T. 1938. A biostratigraphic study on the Cretaceous deposits of the Naibuti Valley, South Karahuto. Proceedings of the Imperial Academy Japan, 14:190–194.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, T. 1959. Upper Cretaceous ammonites of California, part II. Memoirs of the faculty of science, Kyushu University, Series D, Geology, special volume, 1:1–172.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, T. 1967. Evolution of Nostoceratidae (Cretaceous heteromorph ammonites). Memoirs of the faculty of science, Kyushu University, Series D, Geology, 18:331–347.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, T. 1977. Some heteromorph ammonites from the Cretaceous of Hokkaido. Memoirs of the faculty of science, Kyushu University, Series D, Geology, 23:303–366.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, T. and Obata, I. 1955. Some Upper Cretaceous desmoceratids from Hokkaido and Saghalien. Memoirs of the faculty of science, Kyushu University, Series D, Geology, 5:119–151.Google Scholar
McBride, E. F., Weidie, A. E., Wolleben, J. A., and Laudon, R. C. 1974. Stratigraphy and Structure of the Parras and La Popa Basins, northeastern Mexico. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 85:1603–1622.Google Scholar
Meek, F. B. 1876. A report on the invertebrate Cretaceous and Tertiary fossils of the upper Missouri country. Report of the United States Geological Survey of the Territories, 9, xiv+629p.Google Scholar
Morton, S. G. 1830. Synopsis of the organic remains of the ferruginous sand formation of the United States, with geological remarks. American Journal of Science, 18:243–250.Google Scholar
Morton, S. G. 1834. Synopsis of the Organic Remains of the Cretaceous Group of the United States. Key and Biddle, Philadelphia, 88p.Google Scholar
Pervinquière, L. 1907. Études de paléontologie tunisienne 1: Céphalopodes des terrains sécondaires. De Rudeval, Paris, Carte Géologique de Tunisie, v+438p.Google Scholar
Reeside, J. B. 1927. The Cephalopods of the Eagle Sandstone and related Formations in the Western Interior of the United States. United States Geological Survey Professional Paper, 151:1–87.Google Scholar
Reeside, J. B. 1962. The Cretaceous ammonites of New Jersey. New Jersey Geological Survey Bulletin, 61:113–137.Google Scholar
Renz, H. H. 1936. Neue Cephalopoden aus der oberen Kreide von Rio Grande del Norte (Mexico und Texas). Abhandlungen der Schweizerischen Paläontoloogischen Gesellschaft, 57:1–16.Google Scholar
Salazar, C., Stinnesbeck, W., and Quinzio-Sinn, L. A. 2010. Ammonites from the Maastrichtian (Upper Cretaceous) Quiriquina Formation in central Chile. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen, 257:181–236.Google Scholar
Salfeld, H. 1924. Die Bedeutung der Konservativstämme für der Stammesentwicklung der Ammonoideen, Leipzig, 16p.Google Scholar
Say, T. 1821. Observations on some species of zoophytes, shells, etc., principally fossil. American Journal of Science 1st series, 2:34–45.Google Scholar
Shimizu, S. 1934. Ammonites, p. 1–137. InShimizu, S. and Obata, T.(eds.), Cephalopoda. Iwanami's Lecture Series of Geology and Palaeontology, Tokyo.Google Scholar
Spath, L. F. 1921. On Cretaceous Cephalopoda from Zululand. Annals of the South African Museum, 12:217–321.Google Scholar
Spath, L. F. 1922. On the Senonian ammonite fauna of Pondoland. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa, 10:113–148.Google Scholar
Spath, L. F. 1926. On new ammonites from the English Chalk. Geological Magazine, 3:77–83.Google Scholar
Spath, L. F. 1929. Corrections of cephalopod nomenclature. Naturalist, 871:269–271.Google Scholar
Stephenson, L. W. 1941. The larger invertebrates of the Navarro Group of Texas (exclusive of corals and crustaceans and exclusive of the fauna of the Escondido Formation). University of Texas Bulletin, 4101:641 p.Google Scholar
Stinnesbeck, W. 1986. Zu den faunistischen und palökologischen Verhältnissen in der Quiriquina Formation (Maastrichtium) Zentral-Chiles. Palaeontographica, A194:99–237.Google Scholar
Stinnesbeck, W., Ifrim, C., Schmidt, H., Rindfleisch, A., Buchy, M.-C., Frey, E., González González, A. H., Vega-Vera, F. J., Porras-Muzquiz, H., Cavin, L., Keller, G., and Smith, K. T. 2005. A new lithographic limestone deposit in the Upper Cretaceous Austin Group at El Rosario, county of Muzquiz, Coahuila, northeastern Mexico. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Geológicas, 22:401–418.Google Scholar
Ward, P. D. 1976. Upper Cretaceous ammonites (Santonian–Campanian) from Orcas Island. Journal of Paleontology, 50:454–461.Google Scholar
Ward, P. D. and Kennedy, W. J. 1993. Maastrichtian ammonites from the Biscay Region. Journal of Paleontology Memoir, 67(5), p. S1–58.Google Scholar
Westermann, G. E. G. 1966. Covariation and taxonomy of the Jurassic ammonite Sonninia adicra (Waagen). Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen, 124:289–312.Google Scholar
Wiedmann, J. 1966. Stammesgeschichte und System der posttriadischen Ammonoideen: ein Überblick. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen, 125:49–78, 127, 113–181.Google Scholar
Wolleben, J. A. 1967. Senonian (Cretaceous) mollusca from Trans-Pecos Texas and northeastern Chihuahua, Mexico. Journal of Paleontology, 41:1150–1165.Google Scholar
Wolleben, J. A. 1977. Paleontology of the Difunta Group (Upper Cretaceous–Tertiary) in northeastern Mexico. Journal of Paleontology, 51:373–398.Google Scholar
Wright, C. W. 1952. A classification of the Cretaceous ammonites. Journal of Paleontology, 26:213–222.Google Scholar
Wright, C. W. 1996. Cretaceous Ammonoidea, p. xx+362. InKaesler, R. L.(ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part L, Mollusca 4, revised. University of Kansas and Geological Society of America, Boulder, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Wright, C. W. and Matsumoto, T. 1954. Some doubtful Cretaceous ammonite genera from Japan and Saghalien. Memoirs of the faculty of science, Kyushu University, Series D, Geology, 4:107–134.Google Scholar
Wright, C. W. and Wright, E. V. 1951. A survey of the fossil Cephalopoda of the Chalk of Great Britain. Monograph of the Palaeontographical Society, London, p. 1–40.Google Scholar
Yabe, H. 1903. Cretaceous Cephalopoda from Hokkaido. Part 1. Journal of the College of Science Tokyo, 18:1–55.Google Scholar
Yabe, H. 1927. Cretaceous stratigraphy of the Japanese Islands. Science Reports of the Tohoku Imperial University, Sendai, Japan (series 2) Geology, 11:27–100.Google Scholar
Yabe, H. and Shimizu, S. 1926. A study on the genus Parapachydiscus, Hyatt. Proceedings of the Imperial Academy Japan, 2.Google Scholar
Young, K. 1963. Upper Cretaceous ammonites from the Gulf Coast of the United States. University of Texas Bulletin, 6304:1–373.Google Scholar
von Zittel, K. A. 1884. Cephalopoda, p. 329–522. Handbuch der Paläontologie1, Abteilung 2, Lieferung 3. R. Oldenburg, München, Leipzig.Google Scholar
von Zittel, K. A. 1895. Grundzüge der Paläontologie. R. Oldenburg, München, Germany, viii+971p.Google Scholar