Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T02:24:18.368Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

40K-40Ar age calibration of Late Miocene-Pliocene mammal-bearing Huayquerias and Tunuyan formations, Mendoza Province, Argentina

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2016

Larry G. Marshall ,
Robert E. Drake  and
Garniss H. Curtis
Larry G. Marshall
Affiliation:
Berkeley Geochronology Center at the Institute of Human Origins, 2453 Ridge Road, Berkeley, California 94709
Robert E. Drake
Affiliation:
Berkeley Geochronology Center at the Institute of Human Origins, 2453 Ridge Road, Berkeley, California 94709
Garniss H. Curtis
Affiliation:
Berkeley Geochronology Center at the Institute of Human Origins, 2453 Ridge Road, Berkeley, California 94709
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Mineral separates of five tuffs interbedded in the mammal-bearing Huayquerías and Tunuyán formations in Mendoza Province, west-central Argentina, were dated by the 40K-40Ar method. At the locality of Rio Seco Ultima Aguada on the east side the Meseta Guadal three biotite concentrates of a tuff from a level that apparently corresponds to the very top of the Huayquerias Formation (or less probably to the very bottom of the Tunuyan Formation, sensu Dessanti, 1946) yielded an average age of 5.8 ± 0.1 Ma. The boundary between the Huayquerias Formation (namesake and type formation and fauna of the Huayquerian Land Mammal Age) and the Tunuyan Formation (which contains a Montehermosan age fauna at this locality) is thus about 5.8 Ma. At the locality of Rio Seco de la Salada on the west side of the Meseta Guadal, glass concentrates from two tuffs in the upper part of the Tunuyan Formation yielded ages of 2.6 ± 0.1 and 2.4 ± 0.3 Ma, respectively (the latter date is from a tuff located 90 m stratigraphically above the former). These dates indicate that the rocks and faunas from the upper part of the Tunuyan Formation are of Chapadmalalan (i.e., 2.8 to 2.5 Ma) and Uquian (i.e., 2.5 to 1.5 Ma) age. The faunas from the lower and middle parts of the Tunuyan Formation on the east side of the Meseta Guadal are apparently all of Montehermosan age (i.e., ca. 6.0 to 2.8 Ma).

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 60 , Issue 2 , March 1986 , pp. 448 - 457
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ameghino, F. 1885. Nuevos restos de mamíferos fósiles oligocenos, recogidos por el professor Pedro Scalabrini y pertenecientes al Museo provincial de la ciudad de Paraná. Boletín de la Academia Nacional de Ciencias de Córdoba, 8:3–207.Google Scholar
Ameghino, F. 1909. Las formaciones sedimentarias de la región litoral de Mar del Plata y Chapadmalán. Anales del Museo Nacional de Historia Natural de Buenos Aires, (3), 10:343–428.Google Scholar
Baulies, O. and de Olazábal, A. G. 1950. Informe de la Hoja Geológica 25b, Tunuyán. Yacimientos Petrolíferos Fiscales, Buenos Aires, unpublished, as cited in J. L. Kraglievich and A. G. de Olazábal, 1959.Google Scholar
Bonaparte, J. F. 1960. La sucesión estratigráfica de Monte Hermoso (Prov. de Bs. Aires). Acta Geologica Lilloana, Tucumán, 3:273–287.Google Scholar
Bossi, G. E. and Palma, R. M. 1982. Reconsideración de la estratigrafía del Valle de Santa María, Provincia de Catamarca, Argentina. Quito Congreso Latinoamericano de Geologia, Argentina, 1982, Actas I:155–172.Google Scholar
Butler, R. F. et al. 1984. Magnetic polarity stratigraphy of late Miocene and early Pliocene continental deposits, Catamarca Province, NW Argentina. Journal of Geology, 92:623–636.Google Scholar
Carles, E. de. 1911. Ensayo geológico descriptivo de las guayquerías del sur de Mendoza (Departamento de San Carlos). Anales del Museo Nacional de Historia Natural de Buenos Aires, 22:77–95.Google Scholar
Dessanti, R. N. 1946. Halazgo de depósitos glaciales en las Huayquerías de San Carlos (Mendoza). Revista de la Sociedad Geologica Argentina, Buenos Aires, 1:270–284.Google Scholar
Frenguelli, J. 1930. Las Guayquerías de San Carlos en la provincia de Mendoza. Universidad Nacional de Litoral, Santa Fe, 9:1–53.Google Scholar
Groeber, P. 1939. Mapa geológico de Mendoza. Physis, 14:171–230.Google Scholar
Kraglievich, J. L. and de Olazábal, A. G. 1959. Los procionidos extinguidos del genero Chapalmalania Amegh. Revista del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales, “Bernardino Rivadavia,” Ciencias Zoológicas, Buenos Aires, 6:1–59.Google Scholar
Kraglievich, J. L. and Reig, O. A. 1954. Un nuevo procionido del Plioceno de Las Playas (Provincia de Córdoba). Revista de la Asociación Geológica Argentina, 9:209–231.Google Scholar
Kraglievich, J. L. 1934. La Antigüedad plioceno de las faunas de Monte Hermoso y Chapadmalal, deducidas de su comparación con las que la procedieron y sucedieron. Montevideo, Imprenta El Siglo Ilustrado, 136 p.Google Scholar
Linares, O. J. 1981. Tres nuevos carnivoros procionidos fósiles del Mioceno de Note y Sudamerica. Ameghiniana, 18:113–121.Google Scholar
Marshall, L. G. 1985. Geochronology and land mammal biochronology of the transamerican faunal interchange, p. 49–85. In Stehli, F. G. and Webb, S. D. (eds.), The Great American Biotic Interchange. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
Marshall, L. G., Hoffstetter, R. and Pascual, R. 1983. Geochronology of the continental mammal-bearing Tertiary of South America. Paleovertebrata, Mémoire Extraordinaire, 1983:1–93.Google Scholar
Marshall, L. G. and Patterson, B. 1981. Geology and geochronology of the mammal-bearing Tertiary of the Valle de Santa Maria and Rio Corral Quemado, Catamarca Province, Argentina. Fieldiana: Geology, n.s., 9:1–80.Google Scholar
Marshall, L. G. et al. 1979. Calibration of the Great American Interchange. Science, 204:272–279.Google Scholar
Marshall, L. G. et al. 1982. Geochronology of type Uquian (Late Cenozoic) land mammal age, Argentina. Science, 216:986–989.Google Scholar
Moreno, F. P. and Mercerat, A. 1891. Exploración arqueológica de la provincia de Catamarca. Revista del Museo de La Plata, 1:222–236.Google Scholar
Pascual, R. 1970. Evolución de comunidades, cambios faunísticos e integraciones biocenóticas de los vertebrados Cenozoicos de Argentina. Actas del IV Congreso Latinoamericano de Zoológia, 2:991–1088.Google Scholar
Pascual, R. and Odreman Rivas, O. E. 1973. Las unidades estratigráficas del Terciario portadores de mamíferos. Su distribución y sus relaciones con los acontecimientos diastr óficos. Actas del Quinto Congreso Geológico Argentino, 3:293–338.Google Scholar
Riggs, E. S. and Patterson, B. 1939. Stratigraphy of late Miocene and Pliocene deposits of the province of Catamarca (Argentina) with notes on the faunae. Physis, 14:143–162.Google Scholar
Rovereto, C. 1914. Los estratos araucanos y sus fósiles. Anales del Museo Nacional de Historia Natural de Buenos Aires, 25:1–250.Google Scholar
Rusconi, C. 1939. Lista de los mamíferos miocénicos de las Huayquerías de Mendoza. Physis, 14:461–471.Google Scholar
Simpson, G. G. 1940. Review of the mammal-bearing Tertiary of South America. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 83:649–709.Google Scholar