Introduction
The prevalence of childhood obesity is a major public health challenge in the United States that disproportionally affects Latino children. Among preschool children, 16⋅7 % of Latinos are obese, compared to 3⋅5 % of non-Latino whites, 11⋅3 % of non-Latino blacks and 3⋅4 % of non-Latino Asians(Reference Ogden, Carroll and Fryar1). This is deeply concerning, considering obesity can carry into adulthood, putting individuals at risk for comorbidities across the lifespan(Reference McLeod, Buscemi and Bohnert2). The 5-2-1-0 Let's Go! initiative aims to improve health behaviours in children, such as diet and exercise, and has been linked to improved health status later in life(Reference Kerrigan, Rukstalis and Ehrman3). With the rapidly growing Latino population in the United States, it is necessary to better understand how healthy lifestyle interventions, such as 5-2-1-0 Let's Go!, impact health outcomes for this expanding population.
The majority of Latinos living in the United States live in established communities with large populations of other Latino people. However, increasingly greater numbers of Latinos are living in emerging Latino communities (ELCs)(Reference Stepler and Lopez4). ELCs are areas with a small but rapidly growing Latino population. The characteristics of ELCs include a scattered Latino population with no concentration in a single neighbourhood or area(Reference Documét and Sharma5). Those living in ELCs often encounter health, legal and social services that are insufficient and not tailored to their culture or language(Reference Documét and Sharma5). ELCs differ substantially from established Latino communities, and it is unknown whether patterns in health behaviour observed in established communities will mirror those in ELCs.
Obesity can be treated and prevented by altering lifestyle behaviours such as improving diet quality, increasing physical activity and reducing sedentary behaviour(Reference Berkey, Rockett and Field6). The 5-2-1-0 Let's Go! Initiative, developed in the Barbara Bush Children's Hospital in Portland, Maine, targets health behaviours linked with childhood obesity, specifically those related to physical activity and nutrition(Reference Berkey, Rockett and Field6–Reference Must, Barish and Bandini8). The daily recommendations of the 5-2-1-0 message include: ‘eat five or more servings of fruits and vegetables’, ‘limit of two hours or less of recreational screen time’, ‘engage in one hour or more of physical activity’ and ‘limit sugary drinks; drink more water and low-fat milk’(Reference Rogers, Hart and Motyka9). Encouraging children and families to meet these recommendations promotes the adoption of healthy behaviours that are associated with improved health status and lifelong reductions in chronic disease(Reference Kerrigan, Rukstalis and Ehrman3,Reference Rogers, Hart and Motyka9) . Previous research has identified disparities in adopting these behaviours among Latino preschool children(Reference Taveras, Gillman and Kleinman10). Their influence on Latino children living in ELCs, however, remains unknown and warrants further investigation.
There is evidence that engagement in 5-2-1-0 behaviours varies by sociodemographic and home environmental factors in children. Specifically, lower socio-economic status (e.g. parent education, income, parent employment) is associated with higher screen time(Reference Dennison, Erb and Jenkins11), increased sugar-sweetened beverage consumption(Reference Han and Powell12), lower fruit and vegetable consumption, and decreased physical activity in children(Reference Pearson, Biddle and Gorely13). Furthermore, acculturation (i.e. cultural, psychological and behavioural changes that occur in individuals when they come into incessant contact with two or more cultures(Reference Berry14)) is associated with poorer health and health behaviours in immigrant youth(Reference Gordon-Larsen, Harris and Ward15). Other home environmental factors, including parental limit setting, family meals, access to physical activity equipment and having a TV in the bedroom are associated with these 5-2-1-0 behaviours as well as risk for childhood obesity(Reference Conlon, McGinn and Lounsbury16–Reference Dennison, Russo and Burdick19). Previous research has identified racial/ethnic differences in the prevalence and correlates of 5-2-1-0 behaviours among children and adolescents(Reference Haughton, Wang and Lemon20), yet little is known regarding the prevalence and correlates of 5-2-1-0 behaviours in Latino preschool children, particularly those living in ELCs.
The purpose of this pilot study was to provide preliminary insights into whether Latino preschool children living in an ELC are meeting recommendations for healthy diet and activity (5-2-1-0) behaviours and whether those behaviours are associated with key sociodemographic or home environment variables. We hypothesised that in this sample of Latino preschool children: (1) few will meet the recommendations in the 5-2-1-0 message and (2) sociodemographic and home environmental factors will be associated with meeting 5-2-1-0 recommendations.
Methods
Setting and participants
The present pilot study was conducted in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, an ELC(Reference Cunningham, Banker and Artiga21). The Census Bureau estimated that Latinos comprised 2⋅3 % of the population in Allegheny County in 2019 (27 969 people)(22). The Latino population is spread across the county, with no concentration in any particular neighbourhood. To illustrate the community dispersion, Census Bureau 2018 five-year estimates show that, of the 130 ZIP codes in the county, there are more than 500 Latinos in 12, and more than 1000 in 2; there are no Latinos in only 18 ZIP codes(23).
Participant data was drawn from ANDALE Pittsburgh, a promotora-led, home-based child obesity prevention intervention designed to target the home environment to promote a healthy lifestyle in Latino preschool children(Reference Taverno Ross, Gibbs and Documét24). Promotoras (trained community health workers) recruited participants from Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, an ELC. Promotoras recruited participants through their social networks, as well as at schools, churches and community gatherings, using flyers and word of mouth. Participating families were eligible if the parent: (1) self-identified as Hispanic/Latino, (2) had at least one child between 2 and 5 years old and (3) spoke either Spanish or English. The present study is a secondary analysis of baseline data collected before participants began the intervention. This study was conducted according to the guidelines laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki and all procedures involving research study participants were approved by the Institutional Review Board at the University of Pittsburgh. Verbal informed consent from parents and verbal assent from children was obtained from all subjects/patients. Verbal consent was witnessed and formally recorded.
Data collection
A trained, bilingual data collector visited participating families’ homes with the promotora to obtain informed consent, deliver an accelerometer, administer a questionnaire and conduct anthropometric measurements on the children.
Measures
Child 5-2-1-0 behaviours
Child dietary intake
Parents completed the validated Block Food Screener for Kids 2007 (NutritionQuest, Berkeley, CA)(Reference Hunsberger, O'Malley and Block25). This 15–20-minute screener assesses dietary intake from the past week and has been used previously with Latino children(Reference Davis, Ventura and Cook26,Reference Dave, Evans and Saunders27) . NutritionQuest processed the data to estimate specific dietary components. In the current analysis, the variables of interest were total fruit and vegetable servings per day measured in cup equivalents and calories consumed from sugary beverages per day. To determine whether preschool children were meeting recommendations, we modified the guidelines in that children had to: (1) consume 2⋅5 cups of fruits and vegetables and (2) consume no calories from sugary beverages per day in order to be meeting recommendations(Reference Wiley, Cloutier and Wakefield28).
Child screen time
Parents responded to the question, ‘How much time does your child spend watching TV, playing or working on the internet/computer, OR playing video games per day?’ Responses were measured in minutes per day. Children who engaged in less than 2 h per day of screen time were classified as meeting 5-2-1-0 recommendations.
Child physical activity
Children wore an ActiGraph GT3X (Pensacola, FL) accelerometer on an elastic belt on their right hip during a 7-d period before the start of the intervention. Children removed the accelerometer only during sleep hours or water-related activities. The accelerometer collected and stored data in 15-s intervals to capture the sporadic activity patterns typical of young children. Data were reduced using ActiLife version 6 software with non-wear time defined as 60 min of 0 counts(Reference Evenson, Catellier and Gill29,Reference Pate, O'Neill and Brown30) . Data was considered valid if the participants had ≥8 h of wear time on ≥3 d (n 22)(Reference Pate, Almeida and McIver31). For our analyses, we modified the 5-2-1-0 physical activity recommendations for preschool children using the Institute of Medicine guidelines(Reference Pate, Brown and Pfeiffer32). Total physical activity (light + moderate + vigorous, using a cutpoint of ≥200 counts/15 s) was averaged over accelerometer wear time as minutes per hour and participants with ≥15 min per hour on average were classified as having met recommendations(Reference Pate, Brown and Pfeiffer32).
Home environmental factors
Home environment
Using a checklist, parents reported the number of physical activity items available in their home (e.g. basketball hoop/sports goal, wheeled toys, big yard/empty field, etc.). The number of physical activity items available was recorded as low (1–3 items), moderate (4–7 items) or high (8+ items). Parents also responded to the question, ‘During the past week, how many times did all, or most, of your family living in your household eat a meal together?’ The open-ended responses were recorded to low (1–2 meals), moderate (3–6 meals) or high (7 or more meals per week). Finally, parents reported whether their child had a TV in their bedroom (yes/no).
Parental limit setting
We examined two questions from the Parenting Strategies for Eating and Activity Scale (PEAS)(Reference Larios, Ayala and Arredondo33). The first item addressed screen time, ‘I limit the amount of time my child watches TV or videos’ and the second item addressed sugary beverage consumption, ‘I limit the amount of soda/pop my child drinks’. The response options for both items were ‘Strongly Disagree’, ‘Somewhat Disagree’, ‘Somewhat Agree’ and ‘Strongly Agree’. We recorded these responses into disagree (i.e. strongly and somewhat disagree) or agree (i.e. strongly and somewhat agree).
Sociodemographic factors
Demographic variables included parent and child age and gender, maternal education, maternal employment status, household income and country of origin. We recoded maternal education into high school or less, and more than high school. Maternal employment status was categorised into full time, part time, stay-at-home caregiver and currently unemployed, but seeking work. Household income was recoded into <$20 000, $20 000–49 999, $50 000–99 999, ≥$100 000 or more or don't know/refused. We recoded country of origin into ‘Mexico’, ‘South America’, ‘Central America’ or ‘Other’.
The 4-item Brief Acculturation Scale for Hispanics asked parents their preferred language in different contexts (reading and speaking; speaking at home; thinking; and speaking with friends). Response options included ‘Only Spanish’, ‘Spanish more than English’, ‘Spanish and English equally’ or ‘English more than Spanish’. Responses were summed and scored with a possible range of 4–20(Reference Mills, Malcame and Fox34). These values were then recoded into low (score 4–9), moderate (score 10–15) and high (score 16–20) acculturation.
Child height and weight were measured in light clothing and without shoes using a mobile stadiometer and digital scale (Seca, CA, USA). Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as body weight (kg)/height (m)2; BMI percentiles were based on standardised reference criteria(Reference Barlow35). Based on the 2007 Expert Committee recommendations adopted by the Centers for Disease Control(Reference Barlow35), children were categorised as normal weight (BMI <85th percentile and >5th percentile), overweight (BMI ≥85th and ≤95th percentile) or obese (>95th percentile).
Statistical analyses
Descriptive statistics for participant sociodemographic factors, home environment and children meeting 5-2-1-0 recommendations were calculated as either means and standard deviations, or percentages.
We performed χ 2 tests to examine the association between the sociodemographic and home environmental factors with meeting recommendations of the 5-2-1-0 message. If greater than 20 % of the cells had an expected count lower than 5, Fisher's exact test was used. Due to a small sample with valid accelerometer data (n 22), we were unable to analyse the relationship between 5-2-1-0 physical activity recommendations and sociodemographic and home environmental factors. All data analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 25.0 (International Business Machines Corporation, Armonk, NY).
Results
Participants included fifty-one Latino families (mothers and their preschool-aged child) enrolled in the promotora-led, home-based intervention, ANDALE Pittsburgh. The sociodemographic characteristics of participating mothers and their children as well as home environmental factors can be found in Table 1.
Table 1. Baseline sociodemographic and home environmental factors of participants from the ANDALE Pittsburgh home-based intervention (n 51)
BMI, body mass index.
Mean child diet, physical activity, and screen time levels and percentage of children meeting recommendations related to the 5-2-1-0 recommendations can be found in Table 2. There were no statistically significant relationships between meeting fruit and vegetable guidelines and any of the sociodemographic and home environmental factors (Table 3).
Table 2. Mean child diet, physical activity, and screen time levels and percentage of children meeting recommendations related to the 5-2-1-0 recommendationa
M, mean; sd, standard deviation; PA, physical activity.
a Sample size varied based on availability of complete baseline data.
Table 3. Association of sociodemographic and home environment factors with children meeting fruit and vegetable recommendations
† Denotes use of Fisher's exact test to determine χ 2 and P-value.
There were no statistically significant associations between sociodemographic and home environmental factors with children meeting screen time recommendations (Table 4). However, there was a relationship approaching significance (P = 0⋅052) between number of family meals per week and children meeting the screen time recommendations: Descriptively, families who ate 3–6 meals together per week had a higher prevalence of children meeting recommendations compared to children with families who ate 1–2 meals or greater than 7 meals per week.
Table 4. Association of sociodemographic and home environmental factors with children meeting screen time recommendations
† Denotes use of Fisher's exact test to determine χ 2 and P-value.
Country of origin (P = 0⋅032) and acculturation (P = 0⋅048) were significantly associated with children meeting sugary drink recommendations (Table 5). Children of Mexican origin, and those with lower acculturation, had a lower prevalence of meeting recommendations compared with children of other countries of origin and higher acculturation scores. There were no other significant relationships between meeting the sugary drink recommendations and sociodemographic and home environmental factors.
Table 5. Association of sociodemographic and home environmental factors with children meeting sugary drink recommendations
† Denotes use of Fisher's exact test to determine χ 2 and P-value.
Discussion
The achievement of the 5-2-1-0 recommendations in this sample of preschool Latino children living in an ELC was mixed. Descriptively, 41 % of participants met the fruit and vegetable recommendation, 54 % met the screen time recommendation, 27 % met the physical activity recommendation and 58 % met the SSB recommendation.
Previous studies conducted in children 6–11 years old have observed that less than half of Latino children met even one of the 5-2-1-0 recommendations, however these investigations have not included younger children nor assessed determinants of meeting these recommendations in the preschool age group(Reference Haughton, Wang and Lemon20). We found that fewer children of Mexican origin were meeting recommendations compared with children of other origins. Mexico is the second largest consumer of soft drinks in the world(36), and a report from the Mexican government found that preschool children consumed 27⋅8 % of their energy from caloric beverages (e.g. whole milk, juices, soft drinks)(Reference Barquera, Campirano and Bonvecchio37). Mexican immigrants and their descendants represent the largest national-origin group among Latinos living in the US(Reference Budimna, Tamir and Mora38). Our data suggests that meeting sugary beverage recommendations may differ by country of origin. This supports the assertion that Latinos are a heterogeneous group with significant differences in dietary and health behaviours among subgroups. Strategic, culturally tailored messaging as a means of decreasing sugar-sweetened beverage consumption is warranted(Reference Flores39).
In our sample, preschool children with mothers who had lower language acculturation were less likely to meet sugary beverage recommendations. These findings contrast to a previous study by Wiley et al. which found that preschool children with higher acculturated Latina mothers consumed more unhealthy foods and beverages (such as doughnuts, cookies, cakes, processed foods and sugar-sweetened beverages)(Reference Wiley, Cloutier and Wakefield28). Similar associations between mothers’ level of acculturation and child weight status have been observed among children of Mexican immigrants in California's farmworker communities(Reference Sadeghi, Schaefer and Tseregounis40). Subsequent research has further supported the negative impact of parent and child acculturation on both diet and physical activity(Reference LeCroy, Strizich and Gallo41,Reference Crespo, Corder and Marshall42) . However, the majority of these samples consisted of mothers and children from established Latino populations, while our sample was drawn from an ELC in Southwestern Pennsylvania. More research is needed to examine these relationships in both established Latino communities and ELCs, as it is possible that these relationships look different in Latino families living in emerging communities.
There is evidence that the frequency of family meals is lower in Latino immigrant families compared to native Latino families potentially due to acculturative stress, lack of social support and pressure to engage in ‘American’ eating habits(Reference Tovar, Must and Metayer43). Nearly 60 % of our sample reported eating 7+ family meals per week. While not statistically significant, children who ate 3–6 family meals per week together were more likely to meet screen time recommendations compared to those who ate 1–2 and 7 or more family meals per week. According to prior studies, TV viewing during family meals increases the risk for childhood obesity and is associated with insufficient consumption of fruit and vegetables and greater likelihood of the consumption of obesity-promoting foods(Reference Boutelle, Birnbaum and Lytle44). Future studies with larger sample sizes should explore these complex, and likely culturally derived, relationships.
Although the literature supports several sociodemographic and home environmental factors as correlates for children's 5-2-1-0 behaviours, this was generally not supported in this sample of Latino parents and their preschool-aged children. Lower socio-economic status (e.g. parent education, income, parent employment) has been associated with increased screen time(Reference Dennison, Russo and Burdick19) and consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages(Reference Han and Powell12), as well as lower fruit and vegetable consumption and physical activity in children(Reference Pearson, Biddle and Gorely13); however, these results were not confirmed in this sample of Latino children. Small sample size and low variability on some of these measures may have contributed to the null finding. It is also possible that these relationships look differently in Latino families living in emerging communities; as such, future research into these health behaviours is warranted.
For Latino preschool children, parental limit setting has been observed to have both a negative and positive effect on children's healthy eating habits(Reference Arredondo, Elder and Ayala45,Reference Elder, Arredondo and Campbell46) . In the present study, the majority of parents agreed that they set limits on both their preschool-aged child's TV viewing (96 %) and soda/pop consumption (88 %); however, this did not translate into higher levels of children meeting screen time or sugary drink recommendations. Furthermore, other home environmental factors associated with obesity in preschool children, such as a TV in the bedroom and greater accessibility to physical activity equipment(Reference Spurrier, Magarey and Golley18,Reference Dennison, Russo and Burdick19) , were not associated in our study with meeting recommendations. Again, this raises questions surrounding the determinants of healthy (5-2-1-0) behaviours in this population and suggests that these relationships could differ for Latino families living in an ELC, where social support and access to linguistically and culturally appropriate resources are low(Reference Documét and Sharma5).
Strengths and limitations
Very little is known about health behaviours among Latino children living in ELCs. This pilot study provides valuable, preliminary insight into dietary habits, physical activity, sociodemographic and home environmental factors in this population. Most research observing the 5-2-1-0 message and meeting guidelines to date has been in non-Latino preschool children(Reference Khalsa, Kharofa and Ollberding47,Reference Turer, Stroo and Brouwer48) . The sample for this study comprised participants living in an ELC, while most of the published literature examining the determinants of health behaviours in Latino children used samples drawn from established Latino communities(Reference Taveras, Gillman and Kleinman10,Reference Wiley, Cloutier and Wakefield28,Reference Sadeghi, Schaefer and Tseregounis40–Reference Crespo, Corder and Marshall42) . While not population-based, the sample was representative of the country of origin and socio-economic background of the Latino population living in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania.
This small pilot study only included fifty-one participants. This likely limited our precision of estimates and our ability to observe statistically significant differences in meeting recommendations across sociodemographic or home environment characteristics. This limitation is greater for the accelerometry data (n 22). In addition, the cross-sectional study design precludes us from establishing causality. The language-based acculturation measure was significantly related to whether children met sugary drink recommendations. More comprehensive measures of acculturation could elicit different relationships. Lastly, the Block Kids Food Screener may have low validity for certain food groups(Reference Cullen, Watson and Zakeri49), and because most data were parent-reported, there is the potential for overreporting healthy behaviours (e.g. limit setting, family meals, higher fruit and vegetable consumption) and underreporting unhealthy behaviours (e.g. screen time, sugary beverage consumption)(Reference Grimm50).
Conclusions
In conclusion, the current findings suggest that this sample of Latino preschool children living in an ELC only partially met 5-2-1-0 dietary and activity recommendations. The prevalence of meeting recommendations appears to be lower than among children in other racial/ethnic groups, putting Latino preschool children at greater risk for childhood obesity, and exacerbating the obesity disparity longitudinally, and researchers should consider acculturation and country of origin to more effectively support 5-2-1-0 behaviours among Latino families. The majority of what we know about Latino preschool children included samples from established Latino communities, supporting the need to examine these relationships in emerging communities, as these are becoming more prevalent with the growing Latino population in the US. This study should be replicated with a larger sample size to better understand the needs of these dynamic communities. In summary, these findings suggest the need for longitudinal research in ELCs to understand the determinants of obesity in preschool children and to identify culturally sensitive intervention approaches.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by a grant awarded to S. E. T. R. from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute at the National Institutes of Health (5R21HL119395).
N. P. S., C. A. L. and S. E. T. R. conceptualised and established the overall framework for this study. N. P. S., P. I. D., C. A. L. and B. B. G. participated in data acquisition, analysis and interpretation. All authors assisted in drafting and revising the final manuscript and have given final approval of the version to be published. All authors agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
There are no conflicts of interest to disclose.
This study was conducted according to the guidelines laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki and all procedures involving research study participants were approved by the Institutional Review Board at the University of Pittsburgh. Verbal informed consent from parents and verbal assent from children was obtained from all subjects/patients. Verbal consent was witnessed and formally recorded.
Open access
