Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T07:27:56.480Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Testing the Sperry Collision Avoidance System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2009

J. Fedorowski ,
W. Galor  and
J. Hajduk
J. Fedorowski
Affiliation:
(Polish Maritime Academy)
W. Galor
Affiliation:
(Polish Maritime Academy)
J. Hajduk
Affiliation:
(Polish Maritime Academy)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Automatic collision avoidance systems are being installed on board more and more ships and this necessitates verifying their characteristics, as compared with postulated requirements. The requirement for such anti-collision systems may be specified as follows:

(i) Radar echoes should be tracked automatically, regardless of weather conditions, the number of echoes, or the relative distance between tracked targets.

(ii) The system should be operable by a single observer, assuming that the information given is used efficiently.

(iii) The information should be displayed in the clearest and the most comprehensible form.

(iv) The system should facilitate alterations of course and speed.

(v) Information relating to collision risk should be provided in ample time if the system is to operate in dense traffic.

(vi) The system should include alarm devices which operate in pre-determined circumstances.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 32 , Issue 1 , January 1979 , pp. 84 - 90
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Fedorowski, J., Galor, W. and Hajduk, J. (1975). Systemy antykolizyjne z cyfrowyn przetwarzaniem informacji. Zeszjty Naukowe WSM Szczecin, no. 7.Google Scholar
2 (1976). Ocena przydatnosti systemow zintegrowanych na statkach PHM, etap I. Praca zbiorowa WSM Szczecin.Google Scholar
3Fedorowski, J., Galor, W. and Hajduk, J. Analiza przejscia Ciesniny Kaletariskiej z zastosowaniem systemu antykolizyjnego firmy Sperry (under publication).Google Scholar
4Fiore, A. E., Anderson, R. E. and Kapanka, L. J. (1971). Historical approach to marine collision avoidance. Navigation (USA), 18, 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Wylie, F. J. (1973). Marine radar automatic plotter display philosophy. This Journal, 27, 298.Google Scholar
6Wylie, F. J. (1975). Marine radar automatic plotter display philosophy II. This Journal, 28, 345.Google Scholar
7 Galor, W. and Hajduk, J. (1974), Zastosowanie maszyn liczacych w urzadzeniach antykolizyjnych. WSM Szczecin.Google Scholar