Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-dvmhs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-13T07:26:35.792Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Signals for Vessels in Sight of One Another

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 January 2010

D. A. Rodger
D. A. Rodger
Affiliation:
(Second Officer, P. & O.)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

I Have been following the articles on this subject in the Journal 1 with some interest and hope that the personal views of one comparatively junior officer may be of some interest.

It is implicit in all these articles that, except in the close-quarter situation which the Rules are surely designed to prevent, the sound signals are unsatisfactory. What is not stated in so many words is that, international conferences notwithstanding, Rule 28 (a) is more observed in the breach than otherwise. I cannot of course be sure, but I suspect that this has been so since electric navigation lights superseded oil in general use, thus increasing the recognition range and allowing avoiding action to be taken at greater distances. There is also the natural human, if not legally commendable, desire to let sleeping captains lie.

Type
Forum
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , January 1968 , pp. 85 - 86
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 1968

References

REFERENCES

1Wepster, A. (1966). Visual direction indication for ships. This Journal, 19, 265.Google Scholar
2Parmiter, G. V. (1966). Visual indication of direction for ships. This Journal, 19, 394.Google Scholar
3Potts, J. J. (1967). Visual direction indication for ships. This Journal, 20, 105.Google Scholar
4Lindsay, D. J. (1967). Improvement of navigation lights and signals. This Journal, 20, 249.Google Scholar