Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T09:04:50.315Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Routing in the English Channel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2009

A. N. Cockcroft
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Following the Amoco Cadiz disaster in 1978 proposals were put forward, and ultimately accepted by IMCO, for a revision of the traffic separation schemes off Ushant and the Casquets, the broad effect of which was to keep large tankers (and those carrying hazardous cargoes) further off the French coast. The modifications came in for some criticism and recent Anglo-French proposals have now secured IMCO agreement. Prior to that a purely United Kingdom working group sought to formulate a comprehensive and continuous routing scheme for the whole English Channel.

Captain Cockcroft who, as an observer for IAIN at IMCO and as RIN representative on the UK working group on Channel Routing, has played a leading part in these discussions, here describes some of the problems and considers issues raised by concepts such as ‘areas to be avoided’, and finally, within the context of traffic separation in straits, proposes alterations to the Collision Regulations which govern the crossing of traffic lanes and the use of inshore traffic zones.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 34 , Issue 3 , September 1981 , pp. 392 - 413
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1The separation of traffic at sea (1966). (A Working Group Report.) This Journal, 19, 411.Google Scholar
2Study of marine traffic in the English Channel (1977). NM1 Report, R42.Google Scholar
3Cockcroft, A. N.Statistics of ship collisions. This Journal, 31, 216.Google Scholar
4Wepster, A. (1977). The influence of navigational aids on traffic behaviour in converging areas in entrance/exit of the English Channel. Proc. 2nd West European Conference on Marine Technology, p. 171.Google Scholar
5Chalk, R. F. and Coupard, A. AMid-Channel survey of vessels routed past Ushant and Cherbourg. This Journal, 33, 357.Google Scholar
6Cotter, C. H. (1979). An early traffic Scheme for the English Channel. This Journal, 32, 266.Google Scholar
7Oudet, L. Discussion. This Journal, 32, 308.Google Scholar
8Arthur, J. (1979). Problems of a cross-channel ferry master. Practical Navigation in the Dover Strait (Nautical Institute Seminar Proceedings).Google Scholar
9Nash, J. D. (1980). Crossing the Dover Strait separation scheme. Seaways, October 1980.Google Scholar
10Barratt, M. J. (1973) Encounter rates in a marine traffic separation scheme. This Journal, 26, 458.Google Scholar
11Lewison, G. R. G. (1977). The Modelling of marine traffic flow and potential encounters. Mathematical Aspects of Marine Traffic.Google Scholar