Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T16:52:37.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Revolution in Tidal Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 August 2006

Paul Hughes
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Exact tidal study extends back to a fourteenth century record containing sexagesimal times. Earlier commentators have taken these times to be high water. This study shows they are for the later moment of when the flood ends; and, that eighteenth and nineteenth century elevation measurements formed a completely different way of considering the tide, leading directly to reliable predictions. The result shows the Thames tide to have been more consistent than previously stated; and consequently the actual change more accelerated. Therefore tidal current predictions are shown to have a longer history than have water surface elevation levels.

Keywords

Tidal predictionsHistory
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 59 , Issue 3 , September 2006 , pp. 445 - 459
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Admiralty Tide Tables, (annually). United Kingdom Hydrographic Office.Google Scholar
Anonymous. (848). London, British Library, Cotton Vespasian BVI. f.103r.Google Scholar
Amin, M. (1983). On perturbations of harmonic constants in the Thames Estuary. Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc., 73, 587–603.Google Scholar
Beardmore, N. (1852). Hydraulic tables. Waterlow & son.Google Scholar
Benson, L. D. (1987). A riverside Chaucer. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brown. (1905). Brown’s tidal streams. Brown, Son & Ferguson.Google Scholar
Cartwright, D. E. (1999). Tides a scientific history, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dales, R. C. (1966). The Text of Robert Grosseteste’s Questio de fluxu et refluxu maris with an English Translation. Isis, 57, 455–474.Google Scholar
Dyson, T. (1996). A thirteenth-century Thames tide table. Ships of the Port of London, 5, 216.Google Scholar
Flamsteed, J. (1683). A correct tide-table, shewing the true times of the High-Waters at London-Bridge, to every day in the Year 1683. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 13, 10–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, E. G., Murdin, L. and Willmoth, F. (1997). The correspondence of John Flamsteed First Astronomer Royal Volume 2 1682–1703. Institute of Physics Publishing.Google Scholar
Froissart, J. (1927). Froissart’s Chronicles. Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Goldstein, B. R. (2003). Ancient and medieval values for the mean synodic month. Journal for the history of astronomy, 34, Part 1, 65–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, W. B. (1944). Tidal level of the Thames. The Dock and Harbour Authority. March 261-5, April 281-5, May 13-6, June 41-4.Google Scholar
Hawksmoor, N. (1736). A short historical account of London Bridge. London.Google Scholar
Hughes, P. (2003). Implicit Carolingian tidal data. Early Science and Medicine, VIII No.1, 1–24.Google Scholar
Hughes, P. (2005) A study in the development of primitive and modern tide tables. Liverpool John Moores Universityunpublished PhD thesis.Google Scholar
Hughes, P. and Wall, A. D. (2004a). The Flye of 1569. History of Oceanography.Google Scholar
Hughes, P. and Wall, A. D. (2004b). The Admiralty Tidal Predictions of 1833: their comparison with contemporary observation and with a modern synthesis. The Journal of Navigation, 57, 203–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huxley, T. H. (1881). Physiography. Macmillan.Google Scholar
Jones, C. W. (1943). Bedae Opera de Temporibus. Mediaeval Academy of America.Google Scholar
Lubbock, J. W. (1829). The tides. Companion to the British Almanac for 1830. 49–67.Google Scholar
Lubbock, J. W. (1831). On the tides in the Port of London. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 121, 379–416.Google Scholar
Lubbock, J. W. (1831–7). On the tides. Companion to the British Almanac for 1832, … 1835, … 1836,… 1837, … 1838, 13–15, 16–26, 34–36, 5–20, 5–11 respectively.Google Scholar
Lubbock, J. W. (1837). On the tides. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 127, 97–140.Google Scholar
Lubbock, J. W. and Russell, W. E. (1836). Royal Society of London, MA 195.Google Scholar
North, J. D. (1976). Richard of Wallingford. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Moore, P. (1569). A verie plaine and perfecte table. [Bodleian, Broxb.95·70].Google Scholar
Munk, W. H., and Cartwright, D. E. (1966). Tidal spectroscopy and prediction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, A259, 53–81.Google Scholar
OED. (1992). The compact Oxford English dictionary. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Parry, J. H. (1968). The European reconnaissance: selected documents. Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philips, H. (1668). A letter written to Dr John Wallis … containing his observations about the true time of the tides. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 2, 656–659.Google Scholar
Porter, R. and Ogilvie, M. (2000). The Hutchinson Dictionary of Scientific Biography. Helicon.Google Scholar
Proudman, J. (1941). Halley’s tidal chart. Geographical Journal, 100, 174–6.Google Scholar
Rackham, H. (1991). Pliny Natural History Books I-II. 207. Loeb.Google Scholar
Rennie, G. (1833a). Cambridge, Trinity College, Whewell papers R.6.20254.Google Scholar
Rennie, G. (1833b). Cambridge, Trinity College, Whewell papers R.6.20255.Google Scholar
Rushbrook, J. (1841). Joseph Rushbrook. London.Google Scholar
Seller, J. (1677). Atlas ceolestis. London.Google Scholar
Skeat, W. W. (1867). The romance of William of Palerne. London.Google Scholar
Smith, J. (1627). A sea grammar. London.Google Scholar
Smyth, W. H. (1867). The sailor’s word book. Blackie.Google Scholar
Southgate. (1794). A new and correct tide-table for the British Channel.Google Scholar
Thrower, N. J. W. (1981). The three voyages of Edmond Halley in the Paramore 1698–1701. Hakluyt Society.Google Scholar
Wallingford, R. (c.1300). British Library, Cotton Julius DVII folio 45b.Google Scholar
Wallis, F. (1999). Bede: the reckoning of time. Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar
Woodworth, P. L. (1999). A study of changes in High Water levels and tides at Liverpool during the last two hundred and thirty years with some historical background, Proudman Oceanographic Laboratory Report Number 56. 22.Google Scholar
Woodworth, P. L. (2002). Three Georges and one Richard Holden: the Liverpool tide table makers. Transactions of the Historic Society of Lancashire and Cheshire, 151, 19–51.Google Scholar
Yates, J. (1837). Royal Society of London, Lubbock papers, LUB Y.2.Google Scholar
Zabler, B. D. (1991). Military Tide Predictions in World War II. Tidal Hydrodynamics. New York. 791–7. (These are Ryde Night Illumination Diagrams.)Google Scholar
Zuosheng, Y., Emery, K. O. and Yui, X. (1989). Historical development and use of thousand-year-old tide-prediction tables. Limnology & Oceanography, 34(5), 953–957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar