Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T19:20:15.759Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Remotely Piloted Air Systems on Trial and in Operations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 November 2010

Gary Southcott
Gary Southcott*
Affiliation:
(Air Warfare Centre, Royal Air Force Waddington)
*
(Email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The aim of the paper is to inform design staffs on potential Remotely Piloted Air Systems (RPAS) improvements to afford greater utility on the battlespace. The scope of the paper covers Air Warfare Centre experiences working with several NATO Class II RPAS. Using an ‘assurance framework’ that examines integrity of the aircraft, the operational environment and crew competency, the paper identifies what changes need to be made if the utility of RPAS in this category is to be enhanced.

Keywords

RPASAssuranceUAS
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 64 , Issue 1 , January 2011 , pp. 1 - 14
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barnes, K. (2009) ‘The Wider Context’, in Air Power UAVs, Headquarters Air MOD, p42.Google Scholar
Civil Aviation Authority (CAA), (2010) CAP 722: Unmanned Air Systems Operation in UK Airspace – Guidance, Section 2 Chapter 2 Para 5.1.1, Norwich: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Civil Aviation Authority (CAA), (2010) CAP 722: Unmanned Air Systems Operation in UK Airspace – Guidance, Section 2 Chapter 1 Para 5.5, Norwich: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Civil Aviation Authority (CAA), (2010) CAP 722: Unmanned Air Systems Operation in UK Airspace – Guidance, Section 2 Chapter 7 Para 5.2.1, Norwich: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Civil Aviation Authority (CAA), (2010) CAP 722: Unmanned Air Systems Operation in UK Airspace – Guidance, Section 2 Chapter 4 Para 3.3, Norwich: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Civil Aviation Authority (CAA), (2010) CAP 780 Annual Safety Review, Chapter 3 Page 5 Table 12, Norwich: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Garland, J. (ed.) (2010) Handbook of Aviation Human Factors, Boca Raton FL: CRC Press. P7-17.Google Scholar
Joint Air Power Competence Centre (JAPCC), (2010) Strategic Concept of Employment for Unmanned Aircraft Systems in NATO, P3-8. Available, www.japcc.org [8 May 10].Google Scholar
Ministry of Defence (MOD), (2008) Def Stan 00-250 Part 3 Section 15, Glasgow, Defence Procurement Agency, p. 364.Google Scholar
Available, http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/UK_Buys_Another_Skynet_5_Military_Comms_Satellite_999.html [10 Apr 2010].Google Scholar
Available, http://www.ainonline.com/airshow-convention-news/farnborough-air-show/single-publication-story/article/thales-gets-set-for-connectivity-takeoff/ [12 Apr 2010].Google Scholar
Available, http://www.airforcetimes.com/news/2010/04/airforce_predator_040110w/ [29 Apr 2010].Google Scholar