Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T06:37:49.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Navigation Safety Support Model for the Strait of Istanbul

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 October 2009

M. Anil Yazici  and
Emre N. Otay
M. Anil Yazici*
Affiliation:
(Rutgers University, New Jersey, USA)
Emre N. Otay
Affiliation:
(Bogazici University, Istanbul, Turkey)
*
(Email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this study, a real time maritime traffic support model is developed for safe navigation in the Strait of Istanbul, also known as the Bosporus. The present model simulates vessel trajectories corresponding to possible headings, using channel geometry, counter traffic, and surface currents as input. A new MATLAB code is developed for the simulation and the Marine GNC Toolbox (Fossen and Perez, 2004) is used for the vessel hydrodynamics and the auto-pilot model. After computing the trajectory tree of the vessel by forward-mapping its position distribution with respect to the initial position vector, the casualty probabilities of each trajectory are found. Within certain restrictions on vessel geometry, the proposed model predicts the safest possible intended course for the transit vessels based on the navigational parameters including position, speed, and course of the vessel. The model is tested for the Strait of Istanbul for validation. Without loss of generality, the model can be used for any narrow channel with a vessel traffic system providing the necessary input.

Keywords

Narrow WaterwaysMarine Transportation SystemsNavigation, Safety
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 62 , Issue 4 , October 2009 , pp. 609 - 630
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Akten, N. (2004). Analysis of shipping casualties in the Bosphorus. The Journal of Navigation. 57, 345–356.Google Scholar
Almaz, A., Or, I., Ozbas, B. (2006). Investigation of Transit Maritime Traffic in the Strait of Istanbul Through Simulation Modeling and Scenario Analysis, International Journal of Simulation, 7, 1–9.Google Scholar
Bhattatacharya, T., Scarlett, P., Gautier, C. (1996). Artificial techniques for enhanced tracking performance in VTS radars, IEEE1996 National Radar Conference, Ann-Harbor, MI.Google Scholar
Brito, D. L. (2000) Congestion of the Turkish Straits: A market alternative, World Congress of the Econometric Society, Seattle, WA.Google Scholar
Convention on the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972, IMO, London, 1990.Google Scholar
Dogan, E. and Burak, S. (2007). Ship-Originated Pollution in the Istanbul Strait (Bosphorus) and Marmara Sea. Journal of Coastal Research, 23(2), 388–394.Google Scholar
El-Kader, F. A., El-Soud, M. S. A, El-Serafy, K., Hassan, E. A. (2004). An integrated navigation system for Suez Canal. The Journal of Navigation, 56, 241–255.Google Scholar
Fossen, T. I. (1994). Guidance and control of ocean vehicles, John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
Fossen, T. I., Perez, T. (2004). Marine Systems Simulator (MSS).† http://www.marinecontrol.orgGoogle Scholar
Goren, G. E. (2002). Investigation of maritime accidents in the Istanbul Channel via logistic regression and simulation, M.S. Thesis, Boğaziçi University, Dept. of Industrial Engineering, Istanbul, Turkey.Google Scholar
Ince, A. N. and Topuz, E. (2004) Modelling and simulation for safe and efficient navigation in narrow waterways, The Journal of Navigation, 57, 53–71.Google Scholar
Inoue, K. (2000). Evaluation method of ship-handling difficulty for navigation in restricted and congested waterways, The Journal of Navigation, 53, 167–180.Google Scholar
Istanbul Rail/Tunnel Consultants Consortium (1987). Feasibility Studies and Preliminary Designs Bosporus Railroad Tunnel and Istanbul Metro System Project: Hydrographic Survey, Turkish Ministry of Transportation and Communication.Google Scholar
Kahraman, İ (1999). Istanbul channel transport risk assessment via simulation, M.S. Thesis, Boğaziçi University, Dept. Of Industrial Engineering, Istanbul, Turkey.Google Scholar
Kharchenko, V., Vasylyev, V. (2004). Decision making system for vessel traffic planning and radar control, European Radar Conference, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Kiratli, N., Cagatay, N., Polat, C., Balkis, N., Orhon, S. (1997). Preliminary Estimate Of Dissolved Fe, Mn And Pb Fluxes Through The Bosphorus Strait, Proceedings of IOWBSRC Workshop On Black Sea Fluxes, Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission, Workshop Report No. 145, 104–145.Google Scholar
Kornhauser, A. L., Clark, W. A. (1995). Quantitative forecast of vessel casualties resulting from additional tanker traffic through the Bosporus, ALK Associates Inc. Report, Princeton, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Kose, E., Basar, E., Demirci, E., Guneroglu, A., Erkebay, S. (2003). Simulation of marine traffic in Istanbul Strait, Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 11, 597–608.Google Scholar
Le, M. D., Do, D-H., Pham, N-T., Nguyen, H-D., Hoang, S-D., Vu, X-Q., Duong, B. (2003). Toward a fully automated and intelligent marine transportation system, SICE Annual Conference, Fukui, Japan.Google Scholar
Özkan, S. (2003). Stochastic modeling of transit vessel traffic through the Strait of Istanbul, M.S. Thesis, Boğaziçi University, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Istanbul, Turkey.Google Scholar
Paul, L. M. B. (1997). A Vessel traffic system analysis for the KoreaQ/Tsushima Strait, Energy Related Marine Issues in the Gerional Seas of Northeast Asia, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Perez, T. and Blanke, M. (2000) Mathematical Ship Modeling for Control Applications, Technical Report, Denmark Technical University.Google Scholar
Reid, J. D., Judson, B. H. and Smith, V. (1998). Reducing risk with the marine navigation safety system, GeoInfo Solutions Ltd. Project Report. Accesible at: http://www.geoinfosolutions.com/projects/RTCM.pdfGoogle Scholar
Sarıöz, K., Kükner, A., Narlı, E. (1999). A real time ship maneuvering simulation study for the Strait of Istanbul (Bosporus), The Journal of Navigation, 52, 394–410.Google Scholar
Smierzchalski, R. and Michalewicz, Z. (1998). Adaptive modeling of a ship trajectory in collision situations at sea. IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation Proceedings, Anchorage, Alaska, May 4–9, 342–347Q.Google Scholar
Statheros, T., Gareth Howells, G., and McDonald-Maier, K. (2008). Autonomous Ship Collision Avoidance Navigation Concepts, Technologies and Techniques, The Journal Of Navigation, 61, 129–142.Google Scholar
Tan, B. and Otay, E. (1999). Modeling and analysis of vessel casualties resulting from tanker traffic through narrow waterways. Naval Research Logistics, 46, 871–892.Google Scholar
Yuksel, Y., Ayat, B., Ozturk, M. N., Aydogan, B., Guler, I., Cevik, E. O., Yalciner, A. C. (2008) Responses of the stratified flows to their driving conditions. A field study. Ocean Engineering, 35, 1304–1321.Google Scholar