Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T00:17:24.220Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mathematics and the Collision Regulations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 1962

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In the January number of the Journal (15, 104) Captain Wylie discussed the apparent conflict which existed between certain mariners and certain mathematicians about the efficacy of the Collision Regulations at sea. His contribution, which followed the publication in the October 1961 number (14, 379) of Mr. Calvert's ‘Comparison of Two Systems for Avoiding Collision’, was discussed in the same number by a selection of seamen and mathematicians. Followers of this controversy will be interested to read the remarks of Captain Weekes, printed on p. 271 on the subject of how imperfectly many ships' officers understand relative movement. Commander Clissold's suggestion, printed in the same discussion, that Calvert's and Hollingdale's rules should be tested on marine radar simulators is also to the point.

Type
Forum
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 1962

References

Sadler, D. H., (1957). The mathematics of collision avoidance at sea. This Journal, 10, 306.Google Scholar
Calvert, E. S., (1960). Manoeuvres to ensure the avoidance of collision. This Journal, 13, 127.Google Scholar
Garcia-Frias, J., (1960). Anti-collision radar sectors. This Journal, 13, 316.Google Scholar
Morrel, J. S., (1961). The physics of collision at sea. This Journal, 14, 163.Google Scholar
Hollingdale, S. H., (1961). The mathematics of collision avoidance in two dimensions. This Journal, 14, 243.Google Scholar
Wylie, F. J., Sadler, D. H., Gauw, J. A., Clissold, P., Wynne-Edwards, C. J., Bini, M., Freiesleben, H. C., (1962). Mathematics and the Collision Regulations (Forum). This Journal, 15, 104Google Scholar