Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T08:45:12.627Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Manœuvre Criterion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 1964

Extract

The consideration of the effect of observational errors on the problem of manoeuvring ships at sea has, surprisingly enough, only recently become the object of attention by contributors to this Journal, though the basic background was provided many years ago by Sadler. The discussion at the Technical Committee of the Institute emphasized the importance of a statistical treatment of the problem and this led first to a brief note by myself in which systematic and random errors in range and bearing were discussed, and later to a full survey by Hollingdale in which it was shown that the total time to the instant of closest approach should be divided between observing time and manoeuvring time. An article by Proctor, though rather out of the main stream of the ideas pursued by the above mentioned contributors, breaks new ground in the sense that comparisons are made between different types of manœuvre on a probabilistic basis.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Sadler, D. H., (1957). The mathematics of collision avoidance at sea. This Journal, 10, 306.Google Scholar
2Sadler, D. H., et al (1963). The value of a mathematical approach to the collision problem (Discussion). This Journal, 16, 196.Google Scholar
3Parker, J. B., (1963). The effect of uncertainties on the collision problem. This Journal, 16, 414.Google Scholar
4Hollingdale, S. H., (1964). The effect of observational errors on the avoidance of collision at sea. See this issue of the Journal.Google Scholar
5Proctor, J. D., (1963). Anti-collision rules. This Journal, 16, 421.Google Scholar