Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T07:58:26.784Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Investigation on GEO satellite orbit determination based on CEI measurements of short baselines

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 May 2019

Zejun Liu ,
Lan Du ,
Yongxing Zhu ,
Zhihan Qian ,
Jinqing Wang  and
Shiguang Liang
Zejun Liu*
Affiliation:
(Information Engineering University, Zhengzhou 450001, China) (Shanghai Key Laboratory of Space Navigation and Positioning Techniques, Shanghai, 200030, China) (State Key Laboratory of Geo-Information Engineering Laboratory, Xi'an 710054, China)
Lan Du
Affiliation:
(Information Engineering University, Zhengzhou 450001, China)
Yongxing Zhu
Affiliation:
(State Key Laboratory of Geo-Information Engineering Laboratory, Xi'an 710054, China)
Zhihan Qian
Affiliation:
(Shanghai Key Laboratory of Space Navigation and Positioning Techniques, Shanghai, 200030, China)
Jinqing Wang
Affiliation:
(Shanghai Key Laboratory of Space Navigation and Positioning Techniques, Shanghai, 200030, China)
Shiguang Liang
Affiliation:
(Shanghai Key Laboratory of Space Navigation and Positioning Techniques, Shanghai, 200030, China)
*
(E-mail: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Connected-Element Interferometry (CEI) is a technique for measuring the phase delay of difference of Time Of Arrival (TOA) of a downlink radio signal to two antennae on a short baseline. This technique can use an atomic clock for time-frequency transmission and achieve intermediate accuracy angular tracking. Owing to the relatively short length of the baseline, the passive reception mode, and near real-time operation, CEI can be used to continuously monitor the orbit variations of both cooperative and non-cooperative satellites. In this paper, a small-scale CEI system of two orthogonal baselines (75 m × 35 m) is investigated to track a Geostationary Earth Orbit (GEO) Television (TV) satellite at 110·5°E. The phases are extracted from correlation results. The results show that the Root Mean Square (RMS) of the phase fitting residuals, if not calibrated, is within 2° at night and up to 10° in the daytime. After applying the calibration signal, the RMS of the phase fitting residuals in the daytime decreases to the same level at night. Comparing the phase delay with the a priori phase delay using Two-Line-Element (TLE) data, the integer ambiguity is successfully resolved. Finally, a batch algorithm is used to estimate the orbit of the GEO satellite, and the orbit determination accuracy is evaluated using the precise orbits provided by the China National Time Service Centre (NTSC). The results show that the accuracies in the radial direction and the cross-track direction are less than 1 km, and the Three-Dimensional (3D) position accuracy reaches the 2 km order of magnitude.

Keywords

Connected Element Interferometry (CEI)GEO satelliteInteger ambiguity determinationPrecise Orbit Determination (POD)
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 72 , Issue 6 , November 2019 , pp. 1585 - 1601
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Cao, F., Yang, X. H., Li, Z. G., Chen, L. and Feng, C. G. (2016). Signal Biases Calibration for Precise Orbit Determination of the Chinese Area Positioning System using SLR and C-Band Transfer Ranging Observations. The Journal of Navigation, 69(6), 1234–1246. DOI:10.1017/S0373463316000205.Google Scholar
Cao, F., Yang, X. H., Su, M. D., Li, Z. G., Chen, L., Li, W. C., Sun, B. Q., Yao, K., Wei, P. and Feng, C. G. (2014). Evaluation of C-band Precise Orbit Determination of Geostationary Earth Orbit Satellites based on the Chinese Area Positioning System. The Journal of Navigation, 67(2), 343–351. DOI:10.1017/S0373463313000787.Google Scholar
Du, L., Li, X. and Wang, R. (2012). Relative orbit monitoring of GEO co-lactated geostationary satellites by using same beam CEI (in Chinese). Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics, 32(3), 50–54.Google Scholar
Edwards, C. J., Rogstad, D., Fort, D., White, L. and Iijima, B. (1992). The Goldstone Real-Time Connected Element Interferometer. Telecommunications & Data Acquisition Progress Report, 110, 52–62.Google Scholar
Ellis, J. (1984). Performance of a dedicated VLBI system for TDRSS navigation. Advances in the Astronautical Sciences, 54, 111–126.Google Scholar
Huang, L., Li, H., Hao, W., 2014. Impact of Frequency Characteristics on the Accuracy of Connected-Element Interferometry (in Chinese). Journal of Spacecraft TT&C Technology, 33(5), 371–376.Google Scholar
Huang, Y., Hu, X. G., Zhang, X. Z., Jiang, D. R., Guo, R., Wang, H. and Shi, S. B. (2011). Improvement of orbit determination for geostationary satellites with VLBI tracking. Chinese Science Bulletin, 56, 2765–2772, doi:10.1007/s11434-011-4647-0.Google Scholar
Kawase, S. (2012). Radio Interferometry and Satellite Tracking. Artech House.Google Scholar
Kawase, S. and Sawada, F. (1999). Interferometric Tracking for Close Geosynchronous Satellites. Journal of Astronautical Science, 47(1), 29.Google Scholar
Li, X., Huang, J. and Pan, l. (2010). The method of improving single group CEI baselines orbit determination for geostationary satellite (in Chinese). Hydrographic Surveying and Charting, 30(4), 5–7.Google Scholar
McCarthy, D., Kaplan, G., Klepczynski, W., Josties, F., Matsakis, D., Angerhofer, P., Johnston, K. and Spencer, J. (1980). Earth Rotation Parameters from Connected Element Interferometric and Classical Techniques. Guidance and Control Conference, Danvers, Mass., August 11-13, 1980, Collection of Technical Papers. (A80-45514 19-17) New York, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., 237–241. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1980-1755.Google Scholar
Morrison, D., Pogorelc, S., Celano, T. and Gifford, A. (2002). Ephemeris Determination Using a Connected Element Interferometer. Journal of Hepatology, 60(6), S528.Google Scholar
Ren, T., Tang, G., Cao, J., Chen, L., Han, S., Wang, M. and Li, L. (2016). Correction Modeling of Tropospheric Delay and Clock Error in Real-Time Interferometry (in Chinese). Manned Spaceflight, 22(4), 483–487.Google Scholar
Schuh, H. and Böhm, J. (2013). Very Long Baseline Interferometry for Geodesy and Astrometry, Sciences of Geodesy - II. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 339–376.Google Scholar
Shiomi, T. and Kawano, N. (1987). Precise Orbit Determination of a Geosynchronous Satellite by VLBI (In Japanese). Japan Society for Aeronautical and Space Sciences, 35(404), 425–432.Google Scholar
Tan, Z. and Chen, Y. (2015). Study on VLBI Tracking Measurement Technology (in Chinese). Electronic Science &Technology, 2(2), 134–137.Google Scholar
Thurman, S. W. and Badilla, G. (1990). Using Connected-Element Interferometer Phase-Delay Data for Magellan Navigation in Venus Orbit. Telecommunications & Data Acquisition Progress Report.Google Scholar
Vishwakarma, S., Chauhan, A. S. and Aasma, S. A. (2015). Comparative Study of Satellite Orbits as Low Earth Orbit (LEO) and Geostationary Earth Orbit (GEO). S-JPSET (SAMRIDDHI-A Journal of Physical Sciences, Engineering and Technology), 6(2), 99–106.Google Scholar
Wang, F., Wang, Z., Li, D. and Yang, B. (2014). Improvement of Extraction Method of Correlation Time Delay Based on Connected-Element Interferometry. Computer Engineering and Networking. Springer International Publishing, 277, 411–419, DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-01766-2_47.Google Scholar
Wu, W., Liu Q., Huang, Y., Hong, X., Jie, D. and Li, H. (2015). Design and realization of same-beam interferometry measurement of CE-3 (in Chinese). Journal of Deep Space Exploration, 2(1), 34–42.Google Scholar