Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T07:05:31.944Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

III – Secondary Radar for Airborne Collision Avoidance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2009

S. Ratcliffe
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

For many years there has been keen interest, especially in the avionics industry, in the possibility of devising some airborne device which would warn aircrew of an impending mid-air collision. At sea, the use of radar as a collision-warning device is now common, and the carriage of a computer-based collision warning device on tankers in US waters is expected to become mandatory in the near future.

Type
Secondary Radar for Collision Avoidance and ATC
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 35 , Issue 2 , May 1982 , pp. 220 - 241
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Ratcliffe, S. and Ford, R. L. (1982). Conflicts between random flights in a given area. This Journal, 35, 47.Google Scholar
2Hunter, I. M. (1969). Collision avoidance in the air. This Journal, 33, 381.Google Scholar
3Litchford, G. B. (1975). Avoiding mid-air collisions. IEE Spectrum, Sept. 1975.Google Scholar
4Ratcliffe, S. (1980). Transponders in civil aviation. This Journal, 33, 249.Google Scholar
5Hwoschinsky, P. V. and Koenke, E. J. (1977). A single site passive collision avoidance system. 33rd Annual Meeting of the US Institute of Navigation.Google Scholar
6Bagnall, J. J. (1976). Collision avoidance: the state of the art and some recent developments and analyses. Navigation (USA), 23, 262. (Fall).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7US Department of Transportation. (1980). US National Aviation Standard for the active beacon collision avoidance system. US Federal Register (45 FR 711 56).Google Scholar
8Morrel, J. S. (1958). Mathematics of collision avoidance in the air. This Journal, 11, 18.Google Scholar
9Morrel, J S. (1958). Use of self-contained range and azimuth measuring apparatus to detect collision courses. This Journal, II, 138.Google Scholar
10Air Transport Association. Technical Working Group. (1971). Airborne Collision Avoidance System. ANTC Report, no. 117.Google Scholar
11Gilbert, J. W. (1976). Typical aircraft trajectories during collision avoidance manoeuvres, Aerodynamics Dept., BAC Ltd. Aero/S & C/193.Google Scholar
12Airlines Electronic Engineering Committee (1981). Aviation review committee meetings in Malaga. AEEC Letter 81-016/AXX-05. 27 February 1981, Aeronautical Radio Inc., Annapolis, Maryland, USA.Google Scholar
13Calvert, E. S. (1958). The use of aircrew-interpreted devices for preventing collision in the air. This Journal, 11, 327.Google Scholar
14Ratcliffe, S. (1973). Collision avoidance ami the future of air traffic control. This Journal, 26, 423.Google Scholar