Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T02:32:47.820Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hydrographic Surveys by Officers of the Navy under the later Stuarts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 January 2010

G. P. B. Naish
G. P. B. Naish
Affiliation:
(National Maritime Museum)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

We are told by Captain Greenvile Collins that Charles II was ‘A great lover of the noble art of navigation’. I think his brother, James, Duke of York, who became the Lord High Admiral at the happy Restoration in 1660, shared the same enthusiasm. Members of the Royal Society, including distinguished seamen, studied mathematics, mechanics and optics. The time was ripe for improvements to be tried out, under royal patronage, in ship design and construction as well as in the navigation of ships. English methods began to be regarded as not only the best but even as unnecessarily exacting, and we are told that Davis's backstaff was known as the English Quadrant by the French, and the English log and log-line for estimating a ship's speed through the water was better than the simpler methods popular with Spanish, Portuguese and Dutch mariners.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , January 1956 , pp. 47 - 55
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 1956

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Collins, Greenvile (1693). Great Britain's Coasting Pilot.Google Scholar
2Moore, Jonas (1681). A new System of the Mathematics (section on navigation by Peter Perkins, master of the Mathematical School at Christ's Hospital).Google Scholar
3Taylor, E. G. R. (1954). The Mathematical Practitioners of Tudor and Stuart England, Cambridge University Press for the Institute of Navigation.Google Scholar
4Knight, C. (1930). Navigation instruction in 1677. The Mariner's Mirror, 16, 422.Google Scholar
MSS. Hayward, Edward. Accounts of the Chatham Chest, 23 October 1640 to 5 April 1643.Google Scholar
5 MSS. Journals and Logs of the East India Company, in the India Office, Marine Records, Miscellaneous, 4.Google Scholar
6 MSS. Collection of orders for the regulation of the navy 1666–1743 Clumber Collection. (Examination of Lieutenants in 1677.)Google Scholar
7Burney, Captain, James, R.N. (1813). A chronological history of the voyages and discoveries in the South Sea and Pacific, part 3, page 319 (this interesting and unnoticed letter settles several disputed points in Collins' life).Google Scholar
8 (Narborough, , SirJohn, &c.) An Account of several late Voyages and Discoveries 1694. (Narborough, page 85, discusses the attachment of seamen to the plain chart: ‘ but the best Navigation is by Mercator, sailing according to the circle of the Globe, which I ever sailes by’. The surveys discussed in the present article are all plain charts of small areas.) The frontispiece is a ‘Map of the Streights of Magellan drawn by Sir John Narbrough.’ Collins must have helped in the production of this famous chart, used in the eighteenth century by Wordes Rogers, Anson, Byron and other visitors to the South Seas.Google Scholar
9Dyer Florence, E. (1928). The Journal of Grenvill Collins, The Mariner's Mirror, 14, 197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Calendar of State Tapers, Domestic, 1680–81, page 328.Google Scholar
11 MSS. Admiralty Orders ADM/A/1805.Google Scholar
12 MSS. Admiralty Orders ADM/A/1819.Google Scholar
13 MSS. Papers of Charles Sergison, Clerk of the Acts.Google Scholar
14 MSS. Sergison Papers.Google Scholar
MSS. Admiralty Orders to Navy Board, ADM/A/1796.Google Scholar
15 MSS. Admiralty Orders to Navy Board ADM/A/1851 and ADM/A/1852.Google Scholar
16MSS. Admiralty Orders to Navy Board ADM/A/1855.Google Scholar
MSS. Sergison Papers.Google Scholar