Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T11:47:12.303Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Human Factors in Bridge and Chartroom Design

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 1964

P. L. Walraven  and
A. Lazet
A. Lazet
Affiliation:
(Institute for Perception RVO-TNO, the Netherlands)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

When designing a bridge for a naval vessel the designer faces a number of requirements which are quite different from those of a merchant vessel. Besnard states that besides a good view, the officer of the watch requires by him the instruments for determining direction and distance or speed, position finding instruments and other electronic aids, and the means of communicating with the helmsman and engine room as well as some check on these communications. He concludes that a cockpit arrangement of the instruments would suit the requirements. Rees, on the other hand, doubts whether the officer of the watch would remain alert for long periods when sitting in an enclosed compartment, and suggests that a cockpit arrangement is only appropriate where there is little space. Further he argues that the duties of the officer of the watch extend beyond those of simply directing the ship.

Type
The Safety and Reliability of Sea and Air Transport—II
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 17 , Issue 4 , October 1964 , pp. 405 - 407
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Besnard, A. P. E. J. J., (1960). Pleidooi voor de brug, Marineblad, 69, 877–82.Google Scholar
2van Rees, E. H., (1961). Pleidooi voor debrug …, Marineblad, 70, 97–101.Google Scholar
3Hughes, W. P., Jr. (1962). The split-level bridge, U.S. Naval Institute Proceedings, May, 69–77.Google Scholar
4Lazet, A., (1960). Technische Menskundc, Institutejor Perception RVO-TNO, Soesterberg.Google Scholar
5Leebeek, H. J., (1955). Usefulness of the available red filters of the Royal Navy for fluorescent tubes instead of incandescent lamps. Specifications of red illumination, Report Institutefor Perception IZF, 1955, 5.Google Scholar
6Adrian, W., (1960). Beleuchtung auf schiffbrücken unter Berücksichtigung neuerer physiologischer Untersuchungen, Licbttechnik, 12, 351–4.Google Scholar
7Kraft, C. L., (1958). A broad blue lighting system for radar approach control centres, WADC Technical Report, 36–71, NAS-NRCPublication 595. 44–54.Google Scholar
8Walraven, P. L., Lazet, A. and Leebeek, H. J.. (1964). Blue lighting for radar control centres, Report Institutefor Perception IZF, 1964, 1.Google Scholar
9Michon, J. A., and Kirk, N. S.. (1962). Eye movements in radar watch-keeping, Report Institute for Perception IZF, 1962, 17.Google Scholar