Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:17:44.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Future of Conventional Aids to Navigation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2009

Miles Wingate
Affiliation:
(Deputy Master, Trinity House)

Extract

The paper first of all defines conventional aids to navigation and compares both the historical and future roles of these aids in relation to developments in the field of radio navigation systems and technological advances in shipborne navigational aids. It goes on to emphasize the need to provide for all classes of vessel, i.e. those equipped with a high level of sophisticated shipborne aids and those equipped with a low level of such aids, including the not-so-well-found vessel, fishing vessels and leisure craft. Mention is made of present mandatory requirements in respect of the carriage of electronic shipborne navigational aids and the effect of changes in these requirements on the future role of conventional aids. The availability, reliability, accuracies and errors of both conventional aids and radionavigation systems are discussed. The paper concludes that, with the anticipated developments in the field of radionavigation systems such as Global Maritime Satellite Navigation, GPS, Differential GPS, Loran-C and Differential Loran-C, there may be a decline in the requirement for some conventional aids to navigation; the provision of these aids, however, is seen as still playing an important role in the overall mix of aids to navigation used by the mariner. The level of importance of this role bears a direct relationship to the level of shipborne navigational aids carried by the various classes of vessel and changes in the mandatory requirements for such aids.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Clarke, A., (1928). Trinity House – its history & work. Jl R. Soc. Arts. 76, 576.Google Scholar
2Mansell, R., (1934). Trinity House. R. Emp. Soc, 143158.Google Scholar
3Morton, , (1891). Lighthouses, their History and Development. (Reprinted from Newcastle Daily Journal for Private Circulation) Newcastle-upon-Tyne.Google Scholar
4Whormby, J., (1861). An Account ofthe Trinity House, pp. 110111, 131139. London : Smith & Ebbs.Google Scholar
5Cotton, J., (1818). Memoirs on the Origin and Incorporation of Trinity House, pp. 2082, London : Minerba Press.Google Scholar
6IALA, (1968). The definition and method of calculation of the nominal range and the usual range of a sound signal. IALA Bull. 40, Suppl. 3.Google Scholar
7Iala, (1975). Manual on Radio Aids to Navigation, 1st ed., vol. 1, chap. 2, pp. 113. Paris : IALA.Google Scholar
8IALA, (1983). Racons: a review of the current situation. IALA Bull., 2nd ed., 05 1983, suppl. 4.Google Scholar
9Meteyer, J. C., (1985). Report on the activities of the Technical Committee on the reliability and availability of aids to navigation, xith IALA Conference, Brighton.Google Scholar