Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:05:53.009Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

European Studies to Investigate the Feasibility of using 1000 ft Vertical Separation Minima above FL290 Part III Further Results and Overall Conclusions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2009

G. Moek ,
J. M. Ten Have ,
D. Harrison  and
M. E. Cox
G. Moek
Affiliation:
(National Aerospace Laboratory NLR, Amsterdam)
J. M. Ten Have
Affiliation:
(National Aerospace Laboratory NLR, Amsterdam)
D. Harrison
Affiliation:
(Civil Aviation Authority, London)
M. E. Cox
Affiliation:
(EUROCONTROL, Brussels)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This is the concluding part of a series of three papers for this Journal, documenting the European studies into the feasibility of 1000 ft vertical separation minima above FL290. This paper outlines the results from European data collections other than the main precision radar data collection and expands upon the factors affecting height-keeping performance. The development of a Minimum Altimetry System Performance Specification (MASPS), necessary for a reduced vertical separation minimum above FL29O, is presented. A number of implementation issues, in particular monitoring, are also discussed.

The contents of this paper reflect the views of the authors; they do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the NLR, CAA or EUROCONTROL.

Keywords

1. Air traffic control2. Risk analysis3. Flight levels
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 46 , Issue 2 , May 1993 , pp. 245 - 261
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Cox, M. E., Ten, Have J. M. and Forrester, D. A. (1991). European studies to investigate the feasibility of using 1000 ft vertical separation minima above FL290. Part I. Overview of organisation, techniques employed and conclusions. This Journal, 44, 171.Google Scholar
2Harrison, D. and Moek, G. (1992). European studies to investigate the feasibility of using 1000 ft vertical separation minima above FL290. Part II. Precision radar data analysis and collision risk assessment. This Journal, 45, 91.Google Scholar
3 European studies of vertical separation above FL290 - summary report (1989). Doc 88/20/10. EUROCONTROL, Brussels.Google Scholar
4Ten, Have J. M. (1989). European vertical main data collection: processing and analysis, NLR TR 88014 L. National Aerospace Laboratory NLR, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
5Moek, G. and Mimoun, S. N. (1991). Final report on the European military height-keeping study, NLR CR 91304 L. National Aerospace Laboratory NLR, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
6Breustedt, A. and Hurrass, K. (1990). Data collection for the vertical separation studies of EUROCONTROL (military aircraft measured at Büuchel airport), IB 112–90/09. Deutsche Forschungsanstalt für Luft und Raumfahrt E.V., Braunschweig, Germany.Google Scholar
7Ten, Have J. M. (1987). First assessment of the height-keeping accuracy of KLM aircraft based on AIMS information, NLR TR 87120 C. National Aerospace Laboratory NLR, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
8 Aircraft type designators (1981). Doc. 8643/13, ICAO, Montreal.Google Scholar
9Clarke, L. and Irving, J. (1987). Report on investigations into aircraft with measured height deviations of 300 ft or more (‘rogue’ aircraft). Report No. 207, EUROCONTROL, Brussels.Google Scholar
10Rothman, D. and Harrison, D. (1988). Developing height-keeping requirements for 1000 ft vertical separation above FL290, VSSG/DP/223. EUROCONTROL, Brussels.Google Scholar
11Moek, G. and Harrison, D. (1988). Examination of assumptions used within a United States approach to the development of aircraft height-keeping performance, VSSG/DP/222, EUROCONTROL, Brussels.Google Scholar