Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T11:04:29.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Economic Loss Analysis of Fishing Boat Collisions Considering Spatial-Temporal Interaction Effects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 March 2020

Jinxian Weng*
Affiliation:
(College of Transport and Communications, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai201306, China)
Guorong Li
Affiliation:
(College of Transport and Communications, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai201306, China)

Abstract

Considering unobserved spatial-temporal interaction effects, this study proposes a Bayesian spatial-temporal interaction model for predicting economic loss from fishing boat collisions using 10-year (2004–2014) collision records from six different areas in the waters of Fujian, China. Results show strong spatial heterogeneity and correlation effects in fishing boat collisions, while the economic loss from boat collisions gradually decreases with the time trend. Collision time, collision location, visibility and the involvement of LNG/LPG/chemical-carrying ships show similar marginal effects on the economic loss for the two collision types: fishing boat collisions and collisions involving no fishing boats. Navigational status and the involvement of cargo ships exhibit much bigger effects in fishing boat collisions compared with collisions involving no fishing boat. Unlike collisions involving no fishing boat, fishing boat collisions are associated with reduced economic loss in poor weather conditions characterised by strong wind/waves because in Fujian waters additional safety measures are adopted for fishing boats in such conditions. The proposed model is useful for policymakers in adopting safety enhancement strategies to decrease the economic loss resulting from fishing boat collisions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aguero-Valverde, J. and Jovanis, P. (2006). Spatial analysis of fatal and injury crashes in Pennsylvania. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 38, 618625.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Akten, N. (2004). Analysis of shipping casualties in the Bosphorus. Journal of Navigation, 57, 345356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altan, Y. and Otay, E. (2018). Spatial mapping of encounter probability in congested waterways using AIS. Ocean Engineering, 164, 263271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aydogdu, Y. V., Yurtoren, C., Park, J. and Park, Y. (2012). A study on local traffic management to improve marine traffic safety in the Istanbul Strait. Journal of Navigation, 65(1), 99112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besag, J., York, J. and Mollie, A. (1991). Bayesian image restoration, with two applications in spatial statistics. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 43(1), 120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birpinar, M. E., Talu, G. F. and Gonencgil, B. (2009). Environmental effects of maritime traffic on the Istanbul Strait. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 152, 1323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bye, R. and Aalberg, A. (2018). Maritime navigation accidents and risk indicators: an exploratory statistical analysis using AIS data and accident reports. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 176, 174186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debnath, A. K. and Chin, H. C. (2009). Hierarchical modeling of perceived collision risks in port fairways. Transportation Research Record, 2100, 6875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geman, S. and Geman, D. (1984). Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions and the Bayesian restoration of images. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 6, 721741.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
International Maritime Organization. (2002). Guidelines for Formal Safety Assessment (FSA) for Use in the IMO Rulemaking Process. London: International Maritime Organization. Document No.: MSC/Circular 1023, MEPC/Circular 392, April 5, 2002.Google Scholar
Jin, D. (2014). The determinants of fishing vessel accident severity. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 66, 17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jin, D. and Thunberg, E. (2005). An analysis of fishing vessel accidents in fishing areas off the northeastern United States. Safety Science, 43, 523540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jin, D., Kite-Powell, H. L. and Talley, W. K. (2001). The safety of commercial fishing: determinants of vessel total losses and injuries. Journal of Safety Research, 32(2), 209228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jin, D., Kite-Powell, H., Thunberg, E., Solow, A. and Talley, W. K. (2002). A model of fishing vessel accident probability. Journal of Safety Research, 33, 497510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karahalios, H. (2014). The contribution of risk management in ship management: the case of ship collision. Safety Science, 63, 104114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kujala, P., Hänninen, M. and Ylitalo, A. J. (2009). Analysis of the marine traffic safety in the Gulf of Finland. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 94, 13491357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, C. and Sharma, A. (2018). Using the multivariate spatio-temporal Bayesian model to analyze traffic crashes by severity. Analytic Methods in Accident Research, 17, 1431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mannering, F. and Bhat, C. (2014). Analytic methods in accident research: methodological frontier and future directions. Analytic Methods in Accident Research, 1, 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martins, M. R. and Maturana, M. C. (2010). Human error contribution in collision and grounding of oil tankers. Risk Analysis, 30(4), 674698.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meng, F., Xu, P., Wong, S., Huang, H. and Li, Y. (2017). Occupant-level injury severity analyses for taxis in Hong Kong: a Bayesian space-time logistic model. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 108, 297307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morel, G. and Chauvin, C. (2006). A socio-technical approach of risk management applied to collisions involving fishing vessels. Safety Science, 44, 599619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mou, J., Tak, C. and Ligteringen, H. (2010). Study on collision avoidance in busy waterways by using AIS data. Ocean Engineering, 37, 483490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oh, J., Kim, K. and Jeong, J. (2015). A study on the risk analysis based on the trajectory of fishing vessels in the VTS area. International of e-Navigation and Maritime Economy, 2, 3846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perez-Labajos, C., Azofra, M., Blanco, B., Achutegui, J. and Gonzalez, J. (2006). Analysis of accident inequality of the Spanish fishing fleet. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 38(6), 11681175.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perez-Labajos, C., Blanco, B., Azofra, M., Achutegui, J. J. and Eguia, E. (2009). Injury and loss concentration by sinkings in fishing fleets. Safety Science, 47(2), 277284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spiegelhalter, D. J., Best, N. G., Carlin, B. P. and Van Der Linde, A. (2002). Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 64(4), 583639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talley, W. K., Jin, D. and Kite-Powell, H. (2006). Determinants of the severity of passenger vessel accidents. Maritime Policy & Management, 33(2), 173186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talley, W. K., Jin, D. and Kite-Powell, H. (2008). Determinants of the severity of cruise vessel accidents. Transportation Research Part D, 13, 8694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wakefield, J. C., Best, N. G. and Waller, L. (2000). Bayesian Approaches to Disease Mapping. Spatial Epidemiology: Methods and Applications. OxfordUniversity Press.Google Scholar
Weng, J., Meng, Q. and Qu, X. (2012). Vessel collision frequency estimation in the Singapore Strait. Journal of Navigation, 65, 207221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weng, J., Ge, E. Y. and Han, H. (2016). Evaluation of shipping accident casualties using zero-inflated negative binomial regression technique. Journal of Navigation, 69(2), 433448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weng, J., Li, G., Chai, T. and Yang, D. (2018a). Evaluation of two-ship collision severity using ordered probit approaches. Journal of Navigation, 71, 822836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weng, J., Yang, D. and Du, G. (2018b). Generalized F distribution model with random parameters for estimating property damage cost in maritime accidents. Maritime Policy & Management, 45(8), 963978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weng, J., Liao, S. and Li, G. (2019). Bayesian regression model for estimating economic loss resulting from two-ship collisions. Transportation Research Record, 2673(1), 164172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yip, T. L., Jin, D. and Talley, K. W. (2015). Determinants of injuries in passenger vessel accidents. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 82, 112117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zaman, M., Kobayashi, E., Wakabayashi, N. and Maimun, A. (2015). Development of risk based collision (RBC) model for tanker ship using AIS data in the Malacca Straits. Procedia Earth and Planetary Science, 14, 128135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, L., Meng, Q. and Fwa, T. (2017). Big AIS data based spatial-temporal analyses of ship traffic in Singapore port waters. Transportation Research Part E, 129, 287304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar