Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T13:26:58.559Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

D. H. Sadler comments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2009

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The idea of an ‘Altitude-Azimuth’ almanac is not new though most effort (see this Journal, Vol. 1, 185, 1948; Vol. 2, 285, 1949) has been concerned with the Sun and planets rather than the stars. For the stars the simple problem is that observations are recorded in mean time (say G.M.T.) whereas the positions of the stars depend on sidereal time (L.H.A. Aries) given by: L.H.A. Aries = G.H.A. Aries + west longitude. A full account of star tables (and diagrams) using a mean-time argument (and thus avoiding using the Almanac to give G.H.A. Aries) is given in ‘The Genesis of the E. A.N.T.s’ (this Journal, Vol. 6, 333, 1953).

Type
Forum
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 1976