Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T09:10:38.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Conflicts between Random Flights in a Given Area

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2009

R. L. Ford
Affiliation:
(Royal Signals and Radar Establishment)

Extract

This paper, which was presented at a meeting of the Institute in London on 2o May 1981, with Captain R. Maybourn in the Chair, describes some studies of the conflicts arising between a multiplicity of aircraft in straight-line flight through a volume of airspace. Topics include the effect of coercing traffic to fly fixed routes, the direction from which a threat can be expected and the choice of alerting criterion for a groundbased advisory service or an airborne collision-warning system. There are some analogies, perhaps, with marine traffic problems.

There exists, worldwide, a complex scheme for the segregation and control of various classes of air traffic. To fit into this scheme aircraft must make detours, horizontally and/or vertically, the cost of which in Europe alone must be at least £50M per annum. The cost of the rare failures in traffic management is higher still. To authors trained in electronic engineering it is therefore rather surprising that the published theory of air traffic management and control is still in a rather rudimentary form.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Attwooll, V. W. (1977). Some mathematical aspects of air traffic systems. This Journal, 30, 394.Google Scholar
2Proctor, J. D. (1975). Vertical and lateral separation. This Journal, 28, 372.Google Scholar
Proctor, J. D. (1976). Dangers of routing without good control. This Journal, 29, 209.Google Scholar
3Marks, B. L. (1963). ATC separation standards and collision risk. RAE Technical Note MATH, 91.Google Scholar
4Treweek, K. (1965). An approach to the problem of estimating safe separation standards for air traffic. This Journal, 18, 285.Google Scholar
5Reich, P. G. (1966). Analysis of long-range air traffic systems: separation standards. This Journal, 19, 88, 169, 331.Google Scholar
6Brooker, P. and White, F. A. (1979). Minimum navigation performance specifications in the North Atlantic area. This Journal, 32, 357.Google Scholar
7Davis, P. V., Dove, M. J. and Stockel, C. T. (1980). Computer simulation of marine traffic using domains and arenas. This Journal, 33, 215.Google Scholar
8Goodwin, E. M. (1975). Statistical study of ship domains, This Journal, 28, 328.Google Scholar
9Fujii, Y. (1977). Development of marine traffic engineering in Japan. This Journal, 30, 86.Google Scholar
10Lewison, G. R. G. (1978). The risk of a ship encounter leading to a collision. This Journal, 31, 384.Google Scholar
11Commission on the third London Airport. (1969). Papers and Proceedings, vol. VIII, part 2, Section 2, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
12Goodwin, E. M. and Kemp, J. F. (1979). The optimal speed of ships. This Journal, 32, 291.Google Scholar
13U.K. Civil Aviation Authority. (1977). Air Pilot. RAC 1–3, chapter 5.Google Scholar
14U.K. Civil Aviation Authority. (1980). Air Pilot. RAC 3–3–20–3·2.Google Scholar
15Fitzwilliams, O. L. L. (1973). The Independently Targetted Vehicle. Westland Helicopters Research Paper, no. 456.Google Scholar
16Ratcliffe, S. (1972). Manoeuvre in response to collision warning from airborne devices. This Journal, 25, 460.Google Scholar
17Bagnall, J. J. (1976). Collision avoidance: the state of the art and some recent developments and analyses. Navigation (USA) 23, 262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18Alexander, B. (1970). Aircraft density and mid-air collision. Proc. IEEE 58, 377.Google Scholar