Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-l4ctd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-16T02:56:42.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Collisions in the River Scheldt

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 January 2010

Netherlands Pilots' Association
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

On 30 March 1966, Captain A. Wepster, of the Holland-America Line, presented a paper to the Institution on collisions in Western European rivers. Through its publication in the Journal it had considerable impact on opinion abroad and in particular in the Netherlands where it became popularly known in nautical circles as the Wepster Report.

The Netherlands Pilots’ Association invited its nautical committee for the areas most concerned to investigate the findings of Wepster's paper and it is their report which is presented here.

The Wepster Report is a general discussion of the dangers and problems of navigation on the five main navigable rivers of Western Europe. It attempts a critical investigation into the causes of the decline of safety on these rivers and a good deal of attention is paid to the working methods of pilots and of the various institutions charged with organizing river traffic. Captain Wepster concludes his lecture with the remark: ‘… it is now to be hoped that others will throw some light upon it from another angle.’

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 21 , Issue 4 , October 1968 , pp. 448 - 464
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Wepster, A. (1967). Collisons in Western European rivers. This Journal, 20, 12.Google Scholar
2Pilot Nautical Committee, 6th district. Comment on Captain Brouwer's article, Pilot services on the Dutch-Belgian coast. De Zee, January 1966.Google Scholar
3Beattie, J. H. (1962). Safety of navigation on inland waterways in Europe. This Journal, 13, 49.Google Scholar
4Central Bureau of Statistics. Shipping statistics, 1959–1963.Google Scholar
5General Report of the Port of Antwerp. Antwerp harbour statistics.Google Scholar
6Dutch Radar Research Station. River Scheldt radar chain.Google Scholar
7Pierens, C. (1967). Stopping distance and moderate speed. Journal of the Netherlands Pilots’ Association, April: De Zee. August: N.T.T., August.Google Scholar
8Official Gazette. Number 120, 25 June 1963.Google Scholar
91Oudet, L. (1966). Progress in traffic separation. This Journal, 19, 451.Google Scholar
10Pilot Nautical Committee, 6th district. Riverbank illumination. Journal of the Nether-lands Pilots’ Association, February 1967.Google Scholar
11 Commercial Code, Art. 342–2. Pilotage Act, Art. 12–2.Google Scholar
12Kole, C. M. (1966). Inland waterway code—navigation code. De Zee, May.Google Scholar
13Buskop, G. A. (1952). Grounding of the m.s. Arendskerk on Nolledijk, &c, De Zee, June.Google Scholar
14Esso Nederlands publication, Training Centre Port Revel. Journal of the Netherlands Pilots’ Association, October 1967.Google Scholar
15Weeks, M. W. M. (1962). The use of simulators for radar training. This Journal, 15, 262.Google Scholar
16Spilthoorn, R. C. (1957). Navigation and ship handling on the River Scheldt.Google Scholar
17Vade mecum Handbook for the Pilotage Services, 6th district.Google Scholar
18Pilot Nautical Committee, 6th district, Master Mariner Association. Proposal for modification of the navigation code. December 1967.Google Scholar
19Bakker, E. (1953). Responsibility of the pilot. Shipping Journal.Google Scholar