Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T11:50:22.211Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Collision Avoidance Systems and Optimal Turn Manœuvres

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2009

A. W. Merz  and
J. S. Karmarkar
J. S. Karmarkar
Affiliation:
(Systems Control, Inc.)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The International Collision Regulations are explicit only with regard to manoeuvre responsibilities. The manoeuvres themselves have been the subject of a large number of technical papers and conferences, particularly during the past 15 years. Nevertheless, although the use of shipboard radar systems has increased during this time, it is apparent from collision statistics and from the variety of published opinions and recommendations that the manoeuvre-specification problem is not considered as solved. In fact, in many cases, recommended turn manoeuvres can actually lead to a cooperative collision, when more realistic turn dynamics are assumed for the ships. The range of conflicting opinions, few of which are based on an analysis of ship manoeuvre dynamics, provides the motivation for the present study.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 29 , Issue 2 , April 1976 , pp. 160 - 174
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Anon. (1972). Rules of the Road; International-Inland. Publication CG-169, U.S. Coast Guard, Treasury Department.Google Scholar
2Calvert, E. S. (1960). Manoeuvres to ensure the avoidance of collision. This Journal, 13, 127.Google Scholar
3Oudet, L. (1971). How to prevent collisions. This journal, 24, 188.Google Scholar
4Clissold, P. C. H. (1969). Calvert's manoeuvres and the Collision Regulations. This Journal, 22, 269.Google Scholar
5Jones, K. D. (1971). Practical manoeuvres to avoid collision at sea. This Journal, 24, 60.Google Scholar
6Hollingdale, S. H. (1961). The mathematics of collision avoidance in two dimensions. This Journal, 14, 243.Google Scholar
7Calvert, E. S. (1971). Collision avoidance by manoeuvre. This Journal, 24, 413.Google Scholar
8Morrel, J. S. (1961). The physics of collision at sea. This Journal, 14, 163.Google Scholar
9Garcia-Frias, J. (1971). A system of rules for preventing collisions at sea. This Journal, 24, 417.Google Scholar
10Cockcroft, A. N. (1972). A manoeuvring diagram for avoiding collisions at sea. This Journal, 25, 105.Google Scholar
11Inglesby, J. V. (1971). The simple logic of radar avoidance action. This Journal, 24, 219.Google Scholar
12Jones, K. D. (undated). Development of a manoeuvre diagram to supplement the collision regulations. Technical Report No. 5, Liverpool Polytechnic, Dept. of Maritime Studies.Google Scholar
13Thompson, P. A. (1970). Revised rules for preventing collisions at sea. This Journal, 23, 81.Google Scholar
14Garcia-Frias, J. (1971). The turn criterion and the collision rules. This Journal, 24, 56.Google Scholar
15Kemp, J. F. (1972). Collision avoidance and the mariner. This Journal, 25, 511.Google Scholar
16Corbet, A. G. (1972). Collision avoidance at sea, with special reference to radar and radio-telephony. This Journal, 25, 520.Google Scholar
17Calvert, E. S. (1973). Collision avoidance in a traffic system. This Journal, 26, 137.Google Scholar
18Phillips, R. (1975). The avoidance of accidents at sea. This Journal, 28, 137.Google Scholar
19Byington, M. (1975). Defensive seamanship. Proceedings of the U.S. Naval Institute, June, 25.Google Scholar
20Sorensen, J. A., et al. (1975). Final Report—Maritime Collision Avoidance Study. Systems Control, Inc., Palo Alto, California. Maritime Administration Contract 4–37130.Google Scholar
21Merz, A. W. (1973). Optimal evasive manoeuvres in maritime collision avoidance. Navigation (U.S.A.) 20, 144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar