Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T07:57:21.039Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Astronomical Vessel Heading Determination based on Simultaneously Imaging the Moon and the Horizon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 April 2018

Jun-yu Pu
Affiliation:
(Zhengzhou Institute of Surveying and Mapping, Zhengzhou, China, 450001)
Chong-hui Li*
Affiliation:
(Zhengzhou Institute of Surveying and Mapping, Zhengzhou, China, 450001)
Yong Zheng
Affiliation:
(Zhengzhou Institute of Surveying and Mapping, Zhengzhou, China, 450001)
Yin-hu Zhan
Affiliation:
(Zhengzhou Institute of Surveying and Mapping, Zhengzhou, China, 450001)
*

Abstract

Heading angle is a vital parameter in maintaining a vessel's track along a planned course and should be guaranteed in a stable and reliable way. An innovative method of heading determination based on a fisheye camera, which is almost totally unaffected by electromagnetism and geomagnetism, is proposed in this paper. In addition, unlike traditional astronomical methods, it also has a certain degree of adaptability to cloudy weather. Utilising the super wide Field Of View (FOV) of the camera, it is able to simultaneously image the Moon and the horizon. The Moon is treated as the observed celestial body and the horizon works as the horizontal datum. Two experiments were conducted at sea, successfully proving the feasibility of this method. The proposed heading determination system has the merits of automation, resistance to interference and could be miniaturised, making application viable.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adams, L. P. (1968). Astronomical Position and Azimuth by Horizontal Directions. Survey Review, 19(148), 242251.Google Scholar
Broelmann, J. (1998). The Development of the Gyrocompass – Inventors as Navigators. Journal of Navigation, 51(2), 267273.Google Scholar
Fischler, M. A. and Bolles, R. C. (1981). Random Sample Consensus: A Paradigm for Model Fitting with Applications to Image Analysis and Automated Cartography. Communications of the ACM(Association for Computing Machinery), 24(6), 381395.Google Scholar
Fitzgibbon, A. W., Pilu, M.and Fischer, R. B. (1996). Direct Least Squares Fitting of Ellipses. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Vienna, CA.Google Scholar
Gander, W. (1981). Least Squares with a Quadratic Constraint. Numerische Mathematik, 36(3), 291307.Google Scholar
Graas, F.V. and Braasch, M. (1991). GPS Interferometric Attitude and Heading Determination: Initial Flight Test Results. Navigation, 38(4), 297316.Google Scholar
Halif, R. and Flusser, J. (1998). Numerically Stable Direct Least Squares Fitting of Ellipses. Proceedings of the. 6th International Conference in Central Europe on Computer Graphics and Visualization, Plzeň, CA.Google Scholar
Hirt, C., Burki, B., Somieski, A.and Seeber, G. (2010). Modern Determination of Vertical Deflections Using Digital Zenith Cameras. Journal of Surveying Engineering, 136(1), 112.Google Scholar
Hast, A., Nysjö, J.and Marchetti, A. (2013). Optimal RANSAC–Towards a Repeatable Algorithm for Finding the Optimal Set. Journal of WSCG (Winter School of Computer Graphics), 21(1), 2130.Google Scholar
Jurgens, R. D. (1990). Realtime GPS Azimuth Determining System. Proceedings of the National Technical Meeting of the Institute of Navigation, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
John, H. K. (2011). Celestial Navigation in the GPS Age. Arcata, Paradise Cay Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
Kaplan, G. H. (1999). New Technology for Celestial Navigation. Proceedings: Nautical Almanac Office Sesquicentennial Symposium, Washington D.C., CA.Google Scholar
Levine, S., Dennis, R.and Bachman, K. L. (1990). Strapdown Astro-Inertial Navigation Utilizing the Optical Wide-angle Lens Startracker. Navigation, 37(4), 347362.Google Scholar
Li, C., Zheng, Y., Yuan, Y.and Yang, Y. (2012a). Rapid Water-Sky-Line Detecting Algorithm in Marine Celestial Navigation. The 3rd China Satellite Navigation Conference, Guangzhou, CA.Google Scholar
Li, M., Jing, X. and Huang, X. (2012b). Autonomous Navigation for Lunar Satellite with Lunar Oblateness Correction. Journal of Astronautics, 33(7), 896902.Google Scholar
Li, C., Zheng, Y., Zhang, C., Yuan, Y., Lian, Y.and Zhou, P. (2014). Astronomical Vessel Position Determination Utilizing the Optical Super Wide Angle Lens Camera. Journal of Navigation, 67(4), 633649.Google Scholar
Li, C., Luo, Y., Zheng, Y.and Zhang, C. (2016). Research on Horizontal Line Fitting Algorithm Based on Robust Estimation. The 7th China Satellite Navigation Conference, Changsha, CA.Google Scholar
May, W. E. (1948). The Magnetic Compass: A Survey of Developments. Journal of Navigation, 1(4), 342353.Google Scholar
Ouyang, Z. (2005). Introduction to Lunar Science. Beijing, China Astronautic Publishing House.Google Scholar
Robbins, A. R. (2013). Geodetic Astronomy in the Next Decade. Survey Review, 24(185), 99108.Google Scholar
U.S. Naval Observatory. (2001). Celestial Augmentation of Inertial Navigation Systems: A Robust Navigation Alternative. San Diego, White Paper.Google Scholar
Wang, Y. (2006). Fisheye Lens Optics. Beijing, Science Press.Google Scholar
Yuan, Y. (2012). Research on Fish-Eye Camera Stellar Calibration Technology. Thesis (PhD), Zhengzhou Institute of Surveying and Mapping.Google Scholar
Zhan, Y., Zheng, Y.and Zhang, C. (2015). Astronomical Azimuth Determination by Lunar Observations. Journal of Surveying Engineering, 142(2), 17.Google Scholar