Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T08:01:47.441Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Astronomical Refraction at Low Altitudes in Marine Navigation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 January 2010

A. Fletcher
A. Fletcher
Affiliation:
(University of Liverpool)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Every navigator is familiar with the necessity for correcting sextant observations of altitude for the effect of atmospheric refraction. He does this by means of tables which the great majority of navigators are compelled to take on trust, as they would a table of haversines. Unfortunately it is much easier to guarantee the accuracy of a table of a straightforward mathematical function than it is to tabulate accurately an optical effect occurring in a notoriously variable atmosphere. Recent American work based on large numbers of marine observations has to some extent called into question the accuracy of the low-altitude portions of the usual tables, and it therefore seems worth while to give a brief account of refraction theory and also to consider how far it is confirmed by observation. The treatment will be restricted to refraction as it affects marine navigation. This is a considerable simplification. Aerial observations may be made at any level between the ground and the lower stratosphere, so that air navigation involves a much greater range of pressures and temperatures at the position of the observer. Moreover, it involves some occurrence of much more strongly negative altitudes than can be observed from bridge height on a ship, and at such negative altitudes (i.e. zenith distances over 90°) the intrinsic variability of the refraction is large enough to make any table rather unreliable.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 5 , Issue 4 , October 1952 , pp. 307 - 330
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 1952

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Harzer, P. (1924). Publikation der Sternwarte in Kiel, XIII (Theory), 1922–4, and XIV (Tables), 1924.Google Scholar
2Smart, W. M. (1931, &c). Text-Book on Spherical Astronomy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
3Garfinkel, B. (1944). An investigation in the theory of astronomical refraction, Astronomical Journal, Vol. 50, p. 169, 1944.Google Scholar
4Willis, J. E. (1941). A determination of astronomical refraction from physical data, Transactions of the American Geophysical Union, Part II, p. 324, 1941. Also Manual of Geodetic Astronomy, U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey, Special Publication No. 237.Google Scholar
5Smiley, C. H. (1951). Atmospheric refraction at low angular altitudes in the temperate zones, Navigation, Vol. 3, Nos. 1 & 2, p. 33, Sept.-Dec. 1951.Google Scholar
6Radau, R. (1882). Recherches sur la théorie des réfractions astronomiques, Annales de l'Observatoire de Paris, Mémoires, Vol. XVI, p. B.1, 1882.Google Scholar
7Radau, R. (1889). Essai sur les réfractions astronomiques, Annales de l'Observatoire de Paris, Mémoires, Vol. XIX, p. G.I, 1889.Google Scholar
8Bessel, F. W. (1830). Tabulae Regiomontanae… Königsberg, 1830.Google Scholar
9 Tabulae Refractionum in usum Specolae Pulcovensis congestae. St. Petersburg, , 1870. Third edition, Refraction Tables of Poulkovo Observatory. Moscow, 1930.Google Scholar
10Bessel, F. W. (1818). Fundamenta Astronomiae… Königsberg, 1818.Google Scholar
11Main, R. (1858). On the value of the constant of refraction, as determined from… observations… at the Royal Observatory, Greenwich, in the years from 1836 to 1854, Memoirs of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 26 (for 1856–7), p. 45, 1858.Google Scholar
12Hellerich, J. (1928). Beobachtung der Strahlenbrechung in der Nähe des Horizontes, Astronomische Nachrichten, Vol. 232, p. 57, 1928.Google Scholar
13Bakhuyzen, H. G. van de Sande (1907). On the astronomical refractions corresponding to a distribution of the temperature in the atmosphere derived from balloon ascents, Proceedings of the Amsterdam Academy of Sciences, Vol. 9, p. 578, 1907.Google Scholar
14Shaw, N. (1936). Manual of Meteorology, Vol. II, second edition, p. 98. Cambridge, 1936.Google Scholar
15Varnum, W. B. (1922). Differential refraction in positional astronomy, Astronomical Journal, Vol. 34, p. 61, 1922.Google Scholar
16Freiesleben, H. C. (1950). This Journal, Vol. 3, No. 3, p. 270, July 1950.Google Scholar
17Smiley, C. H. (1950). Atmospheric refraction at low angular altitudes in the tropics, Navigation, Vol. 2, No. 5, p. 110, March 1950.Google Scholar
18Smiley, C. H. (1952). Atmospheric refraction at low angular altitudes in the polar regions, Navigation, Vol. 3, No. 3, p. 81, March 1952.Google Scholar
19Ivory, J. (1823, 1838). On the astronomical refractions, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, p. 409, 1823, and On the theory of the astronomical refractions, Navigation, Vol. 3, No. 3, Part 2, p. 169, 1838.Google Scholar
20Delambre, J. B. J. (1814). Astronomie, Tome I, Chap. XIII, Paris, 1814 (with references to earlier work of the same author).Google Scholar
21Clemence, G. M. (1951). Refraction near the horizon, Navigation, Vol. 3, Nos. 1&2, p. 36, Sept.-Dec. 1951. (An abstract is given in Astronomical Journal, Vol. 56, p. 123, Oct. 1951.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22Sadler, D. H. (1952). This Journal, Vol. V, No. 3, p. 223, July 1952.Google Scholar
23Foster, L. R. R. (1952). Some recent work on polar navigation (with Appendix by Freiesleben on dip observations). This Journal, Vol. V, No. 1, p. 12, Jan. 1952.Google Scholar
24Peterson, B. C. (1952). This Journal, Vol. V, No. 1, p. 31, Jan. 1952.Google Scholar