Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T15:47:56.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Amendments to the Rules

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 January 2010

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A Great deal has already been written about possible amendments to the Collision Regulations, but as there may be an international conference on the subject in 1972 the various schemes should be discussed as much as possible so that their advantages and disadvantages will be fully appreciated.

Criticism of the present Steering and Sailing Rules is mainly concerned with Rule 21. Disadvantages of this rule include the following:

(1) If a giving-way vessel on a crossing course takes no action the privileged vessel must not act until collision cannot be avoided by the giving-way vessel alone. By such time collision is likely to be inevitable.

(2) Small sailing vessels which may not easily be seen, especially at night, are required to maintain course and speed for large power-driven vessels.

(3) High-speed vessels such as hovercraft are required to maintain course and speed for low powered ships crossing from the port side.

(4) No provision is made for different types of hampered vessel approaching one another so as to involve risk of collision. If deep-draught vessels in certain areas are to be included in this category in the future the question of priorities may have to be considered.

Type
Forum
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 1970

References

REFERENCES

1Kemp, J. F. (1965). Some suggestions on the rules for Preventing Collision at Sea. This Journal, 18, 233.Google Scholar