Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T05:28:58.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sources of Latitude Error in English Sixteenth Century Navigation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2009

Extract

An examination of accounts of sixteenth-century voyages shows that the estimations of latitude then arrived at by astronomical means were subject to widely varying error. The purpose of the present study has been to discover by practical experiments at sea, with replicas of instruments in use at the time, to what extent the size and irregularity of the errors can be attributed to the characteristics of the instruments and to what extent they arise from other causes. Observations were made from a 9-ton yacht under conditions not wholly dissimilar to those obtaining in some of the very small ships whose voyages are recorded.

The evidence for latitude errors is derived from published studies and from the writer's own analyses of three voyages made in northern waters by ships of the Muscovy Company: those of Stephen Borough of 1556 and 1557 and that of Arthur Pet and Charles Jackman of 1580. These were chosen because the masters in that Company's service received the best nagivational advice of the time3 and from the early 1550s onwards regularly recorded both latitude and compass variation. Furthermore, the relatively low altitude of the Sun in the higher latitudes was conducive to greater accuracy with a cross-staff.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES AND REFERENCES

1Hakluyt, Richard (1589). The Principall Navigations, Voyages and Discoveries of the English Nation. Cambridge University Press, 1965.Google Scholar
2Hakluyt, Richard (1589). The Principall Navigations, Voyages and Discoveries of the English Nation. Cambridge University Press, 1965.Google Scholar
3Waters, D. W. (1948). The Art of Navigation in England in Elizabethan and Early Stuart Times. London, 1958, Ch. 3.Google Scholar
4Hewson, J. B. (1963). A History of the Practice of Navigation. Glasgow, p. 109.Google Scholar
5Asher, George, ed. Henry Hudson, the Navigator. Hakluyt Society, 1st Series, no. 27, introduction.Google Scholar
6Ravenhill, W. (1982). The Lizard as a landfall. This Journal 35, 75.Google Scholar
7Bourne, William, A Regiment for the Sea and other Writings on Navigation, ed. Taylor, E. G. R.. Hakluyt Society, 2nd Series, no. 121.Google Scholar
8Hewson, , op. cit. p. 74.Google Scholar
9Cortesao, Armando, The History of Portuguese Cartography, Coimbra, 1971, vol. 11, chapters vii and viii by Luís Albuquerque.Google Scholar
10Hewson, , op. cit. p. 71 and Anderson, R. G. W., The Mariner's Astrolabe (exhibition catalogue). The Royal Scottish Museum, Edinburgh, 1972.Google Scholar
11Chapman, Allan, Dividing the Circle. Doctoral thesis Oxford, 1978 (unpublished).Google Scholar
12Stimson, A. N. and C. St. 1Daniel, J. H., The Historical Development and Modern Use of the Cross-Staff. London, 1977.Google Scholar
13Morris, P. G. The writer is indebted to Mr Alan Stimson of the National Maritime Museum, Greenwich, for permission to consult Morris's unpublished paper and other material.Google Scholar
14 A good early example is 12Blaeu, Willem Janszoon, The Sea Mirror, Amsterdam, 1625, many times reprinted in English.Google Scholar
15Wright, Edward, Certaine Errors in Navigation, London, 1599, ch. xv.Google Scholar
16Taylor, E. G. R. (1959). Hariot's instructions for Ralegh's voyage to Guiana in 1595. This Journal, 5, 345.Google Scholar
17Bourne, William, op. cit. p. 209Google Scholar
18Bourne, William, op. cit. p. 209Google Scholar
19Taylor/Hariot, , op. cit.Google Scholar
20Cotter, Charles H., A History of Nautical Astronomy. London, 1968, p. 121.Google Scholar
21 The Institute Working Party Report, The Accuracy of Astronomical Observation at Sea, (Journal, 10, 223) and Observational Errors by Anderson, E. W. and Parker, J. B. (R.I.N. publication) have been consulted for guidance in interpreting the results.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22Davis, John, The Seaman's Secrets, London, 1595.Google Scholar
23Cotter, , op. cit.Google Scholar
24Taylor/Hariot, , op. cit.Google Scholar
25Wright, , op. cit.Google Scholar
26Waters, , op. cit. p. 586.Google Scholar
27Taylor, E. G. R. (1952). The navigating manual of Columbus. This Journal, 5, 42.Google Scholar
28 The tables in question are those in Cortes, Martin, The Art of Navigation, trans. Richard, Eden, London, 1951 (Spanish original 1551), reproduced in Waters, op. cit., plates xiii, xiv and xv; and those in Bourne, , op. and ed. cit. pp. 190205.Google Scholar
29Taylor, E. G. R., Tudor Geography 1485–1583, p. 54. London, 1930.Google Scholar
30Roche, John J. (1981). Hariot's Regiment of the Sun and its background in 16th century navigation. Br. J. Hist. Sc., 14, 48, 245.Google Scholar
31Bourne, William, op. and ed. cit. p. 169.Google Scholar
32Hakluyt, , op. cit.Google Scholar