Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T02:20:29.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Satellite Navigation: GPS Inadequacies: Comparative Study into Solutions for Civil Aviation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2009

J. -M. Durand
J. -M. Durand
Affiliation:
(Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Global Positioning System (GPS) will be an extremely high-performance satellite-based navigation system which is expected to provide a sole means air navigation service for most aeronautical flight phases. It will be particularly suitable for ‘en route’, ‘terminal’ and ‘non-precision approach’ phases, thus providing substantial savings on aircraft operating costs.

However, GPS has three major disadvantages for civil aviation: (1) Insufficient system integrity, since satellites can transmit erroneous information for two hours before being repaired or neutralized. In such an event, the many simultaneous users of the satellite that has lost its integrity can derive false positions and remain unaware of the problem. (2) Availability constrained by the limited number of satellites. Users are then unable to obtain a position fix or else obtain a result with significantly degraded performance. (3) Deliberate spatio-temporal degradation (selective availability) of system performance, the characteristics of which are not fully known or defined.

Many solutions to these problems have been put forward. One concept uses the redundancy of the GPS system itself (receiver autonomous integrity monitoring). Another set of solutions is based on complementary information from autonomous navigation equipment (altimeter, clock, inertial system) or external navigation systems already available or being developed (Omega, Loran-C, GLONASS). A third type of solution is to implement a system by which to monitor the status of the GPS satellites and broadcast the information to users.

This paper reports on the different techniques put forward and uses different qualitative criteria (technical feasibility, cost, political independence, etc.) to assess their suitability for civil aviation applications. The comparison leads to the recommendation of a system to monitor the status of the GPS satellites and broadcast the information to users. The characteristics of such messages would be as similar as possible to those of GPS messages.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 43 , Issue 1 , January 1990 , pp. 8 - 17
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 NATO/Military Agency for Standardization, NAVSTAR–GPS system characteristics, preliminary draft. STANAG 4294, draft issue J. 20 April 1989.Google Scholar
2Anodina, T. G. The GLONASS system technical characteristics and performance. FANS/4-WP/70 & WP/75. 6 May 1988.Google Scholar
3NATO. Introduction to NAVSTAR CPS user equipment. ANP-2 Edition No 1. September 1988.Google Scholar
41988 Federal Radionavigation Plan. DOT-TSC-RSPA88-88-88-4.Google Scholar
5 GPS Integrity Channel Working Group (RTCA). Minimum Aviation System Performance Standards (proposed final draft). RTCA Paper No. 364-88/SC159-190. 9 September 1988.Google Scholar
6 Global Positioning System (GPS) integrity for civil aviation. RTCA Paper No. 285-87/SC159-109. 3 June 1987.Google Scholar
7Green, G. B., Massat, P. D. & Rhodus, N. W.The GPS 21 primary satellite constellation. Navigation, Vol. 36, No. 1, Spring 1989, pp. 9–24.Google Scholar
8Braff, R., Shively, C. A. & Zeltser, M. J.Radionavigation system integrity and reliability. Proceedings of the IEEE. Vol. 71, No. 10, August 1983.Google Scholar
9RTCM. Recommendations of special committee 104. Differential NAVSTAR/GPS service. RTCA Paper No. 425-87/SC159-126. 20 November 1985.Google Scholar
10Hogle, L., Possibilité d'utilisation du GPS pour les approche de précision. Navigation, Vol. 37, No. 146, April 1989, pp. 204–224.Google Scholar
11 Comité Spécial des Futurs Systémes de Navigation Aérienne (FANS)-Résumé analytique. Navigation No. 144, October. 1988, pp. 517–527.Google Scholar
12Carel, O.La place de NAVSTAR/GPS dans l'Aviation Civile. Navigation, Vol. 35, No. 139, July 1987, pp. 358–368.Google Scholar
13Braff, R. Global Positioning System (GPS) Integrity Channel. MITRE MP-85W15. October 1985.Google Scholar
14Brown, A. & Jessop, R. Receiver autonomous integrity monitoring using the 24 satellite GPS constellation. RTCA Paper No. 279-87/SC159-102. May 1987.Google Scholar
15Brown, R. G. Receiver autonomous integrity monitoring (RAIM) update. RTCA Paper No. 265-88/SC159-174. June 1988.Google Scholar
16Kalafus, R. M. Reliability of navigation service provided by the Global Positioning System. Final report. DOT/FAA/ES-85/4 DOT-TSC-FAA-85-4. September 1985.Google Scholar
17Lloret, P. & Capit, B.Inertie-GPS: un mariage de raison...àl'essai. Navigation, Vol. 35, No. 139, July 1987, pp. 295–325.Google Scholar
18Brown, R. G. & Hwang, P. Y. C. GPS failure detection by autonomous means within the cockpit. RTCA Paper No. 247 86/SC159-26. 1986.Google Scholar
19Carel, O.Les applications opérationnelles du Loran-C. Colloque de l'institut de navigation ‘Vers la definition d'un systéme de navigation européen’. Le Bourget, 20 October. 1988. Navigation. Vol. 37, No. 145, 01 1989, pp. 30–35.Google Scholar
20Polhemus, L.Intégration GPS/Loran-C. Navigation, Vol. 37, No. 145, January 1989, pp. 77–85.Google Scholar
21Tarnowski, E.Architecture d'un systéme optimal de navigation intégrant le GPS. Navigation. Vol. 36, No. 144, October 1988, pp. 437–449.Google Scholar
22Braff, R. & Bradley, J. Global Positioning System as a sole means for civil air navigation. Proceedings of 1984 Position Location and Navigation Symposium, December 1984.Google Scholar
23Starker, S. A.GPS-NAVSTAR-supplement as a possibility for autonomous civil satellite navigation. IAF–84–426. 35TH CONGRESS OF THE IAF. Lausanne. 7–13 October 1984.Google Scholar
24Kalafus, R. M. & Chin, G. Reliability enhancement of GPS navigation service provided by the addition of geostationary satellites. Project Memorandum, DOT-TSC-FA-560-PM-85. 18 September, 1985.Google Scholar
25Berthault, M. L., Labasque, Y. and Hozé, P.Intérêet d'un complément géostationnaire au systéme NAVSTAR/GPS. Navigation. Vol. 35, No. 138, April 1987, pp. 219–240.Google Scholar
26Eydaleine, G.Vers un systéme mondial de navigation par satellite. Navigation. Vol. 37, No. 145, January 1989, pp. 68–76.Google Scholar