Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-12T19:37:08.686Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

GPS-GLONASS-GALILEO: A Dynamical Comparison

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2008

Stelian Cojocaru ,
Eugen Birsan ,
Ghiorghe Batrinca  and
Paulica Arsenie
Stelian Cojocaru*
Affiliation:
(Allied Maritime Component Command, HQNaples, Italy)
Eugen Birsan
Affiliation:
(Maritime University Constantza, Romania)
Ghiorghe Batrinca
Affiliation:
(Maritime University Constantza, Romania)
Paulica Arsenie
Affiliation:
(Maritime University Constantza, Romania)
*
(Email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The new millennium brought an asymptotic interest in space technology. Besides existing operational global positioning systems i.e. GPS and GLONASS, another two have already emerged: GALILEO and Compass/Beidou. Alternatives to GPS imposed the GNSS concept, which has crystallized in a short time. The true reasoning of this excessive need for positioning information is beyond the scope of this paper; instead, an analysis of orbital behaviour of GPS, GLONASS and GALILEO is conducted. GNSS orbits have similar characteristics permitting us to encompass them under the term Medium Earth Orbits (MEO). However, small differences between mean orbital elements of the three systems produce a significantly different reaction of their satellites' orbits to the natural perturbing factors. This study analyzes the three space segment characteristics, introduces the analytical method used to evaluate variations of orbital elements under the most significant perturbing influences and offers a broad comparative image of the dynamic behaviour of the three GNSS constellations.

Keywords

GNSSSpace segmentOrbital perturbations
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 62 , Issue 1 , January 2009 , pp. 135 - 150
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bate, R.R., Mueller, D.D., White, J.E. (1971). Fundamentals of Astrodynamics. Dover Publications, New York.Google Scholar
Borjesson, J., Johansson, J., Darin, F. (1999). GLONASS: Experiences From The First Global Campaign. Radio Vetenskap pch Kommunikation 99 (RVK99), Karlskrona, Sweden, June 14–17.Google Scholar
Brouwer, D., Clemence, G., , M. (1961). Methods of Celestial Mechanics. Academic Press, New York-London.Google Scholar
Cojocaru, S. (2007). A Numerical Approach to GPS Satellite Perturbed Orbit Computation. The Journal of Navigation, issue 3, vol. 60, p. 483–495, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goad, C.C. (1977). Application of Digital Filtering to Satellite Geodesy, NOAA Techn. Report NOS 71 NGS6, Rockville.Google Scholar
Gibbons, G. (2008). China GNSS 101, Inside GNSS Magazine, Jan–Feb.Google Scholar
Kaula, W.M. (1966). Theory of Satellite Geodesy, Blaisdell Publ.Co., London.Google Scholar
Kozai, Y. (1959). On the effects of the sun and the moon upon the motion of a close Earth satellite. SAO Spec. Rep.22.Google Scholar
Kozai, Y. (1966). Lunisolar perturbations with short perturbations. SAO Spec. Rep.235.Google Scholar
Lambeck, K., Cazenave, A., Balmino, G. (1975). Solid Earth and Fluid Tides from Satellite Orbit Analysis. Proc.Int.Symp. “Use of Artificial Satellites for Geodesy and Geodynamics”, Athens, p.353–393.Google Scholar
Landau, H., Hagmeier, D. (1986). Analysis of the required force-modelling for NAVSTAR/GPS satellites. UBW Munchen, H.19, p.193–208.Google Scholar
Lindström, G., Gasparini, G. (2003). The Galileo Satellite System and its Security Implications. The European Union Institute for Security Studies, Occasional Papers, No.44.Google Scholar
Parkinson, B.W. (1994). GPS Eyewitness: The Early Years, GPS World, Sept. p.42.Google Scholar
Polischuk, G.M. et. al. (2006). The Global Navigation Satellite System GLONASS: Development and Usage in the 21st Century. 34th Annual Precise Time and Time Interval Meeting.Google Scholar
Rand Corporation. (2000). GPS System, Annex B (GPS History, Chronology, and Budgets), p.237–280.Google Scholar
Seeber, G.Satellite Geodesy. Foundations, Methods and Applications. W. de Gruyter, Berlin-New York, 1993.Google Scholar