Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T02:28:15.068Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluating the Feasibility of a Radar Separation Minimum for a Long-Range SSR

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2009

Sakae Nagaoka
Affiliation:
(Electronic Navigation Research Institute, Ministry of Transport, Tokyo)
Osamu Amai
Affiliation:
(Electronic Navigation Research Institute, Ministry of Transport, Tokyo)
Yasuo Watanabe
Affiliation:
(Electronic Navigation Research Institute, Ministry of Transport, Tokyo)

Extract

This paper deals with an analytical method for establishing a separation minimum for air traffic control using a monopulse SSR (Secondary Surveillance Radar), namely the Long Range SSR (LSSR), of which coverage is extended to 250 n.m. The azimuth estimation accuracy of the monopulse SSR was significantly improved compared with that of conventional SSR.

As an index of a collision risk due to azimuth errors of the LSSR, the close approach probability (CAP) associated with the probability of overlap of aircraft in azimuth is used for evaluating the safety of the surveillance system. The CAPs for both the LSSR and the conventional SSR are estimated by modelling and comparing distributions of azimuth errors. The CAP for the LSSR is significantly smaller than that for the conventional one under 5 n.m. separation minimum.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1van der Kraan, P. (1983). An Engineering View on the Relation between the Radar Separation Minimum and Certain Performance Characteristics of Digitized Radar Data. Eurocontrol Report 3E1030.Google Scholar
2Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans. Autom. Contr. AC–19, 716723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Rhodes, D. R. (1959). Introduction to Monopulse. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
4Ozawa, J.et al. (1979). Tracking algorithm development in the RDP system. Japan Telecommunications Review, pp. 275281.Google Scholar
5Reich, P. (1966). Analysis of long range air traffic systems. This Journal, 19, 88, 169, 331.Google Scholar
6Takano, H.et al. (1988). Monopulse SSR System. NEC Research and Development, no. 88, PP. 5764.Google Scholar