Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T16:59:39.820Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Comprehensive Analysis of Ionospheric Anomalies before the Mw7·1 Van Earthquake on 23 October 2011

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 October 2018

Erman Şentürk Open the ORCID record for Erman Şentürk [Opens in a new window] ,
Hamdullah Livaoğlu  and
Murat Selim Çepni
Erman Şentürk*
Affiliation:
(Department of Surveying Engineering, Kocaeli University, Turkey)
Hamdullah Livaoğlu
Affiliation:
(Department of Geophysical Engineering, Kocaeli University, Turkey)
Murat Selim Çepni
Affiliation:
(Department of Surveying Engineering, Kocaeli University, Turkey)
*
(E-mail: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this study, possible ionospheric precursors of the Mw7·1 Van earthquake are investigated with temporal, spatial and spectral analyses. For this purpose, Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) data of 11 International GNSS Service (IGS) stations and 17 Turkish National Permanent Real-Time Kinematic (RTK) Network (TNPGN-Active) stations were utilised. In addition, Global Ionosphere Map (GIM) data produced by the Center for Orbit Determination in Europe (CODE) was used to obtain GIM-vertical Total Electron Content (vTEC) values for the epicentre. The results of the temporal and spectral analysis indicate an increase (2–8 Total Electron Content Units (TECU)) before the Van earthquake occurred on 9 October, 15–16 October and 21–23 October within 15 days, 8–9 days and 1–3 days prior to the earthquake. The Cross-Wavelet Transform (CWT) method was used to examine the presence of correlation between noticeable variations and space-weather. It is deduced from the CWT analysis that the anomalies should originate from either solar effects or the Van earthquake due to coupling between the F10·7 solar activity index and TEC variations on the anomaly days. The results demonstrate that interdisciplinary approaches and various methods including frequency domain could be used to determine the presence of an earthquake-related anomaly in the ionosphere accurately.

Keywords

Cross-wavelet transformsRegional ionosphere mapShort-time Fourier transformTotal electron contentVan earthquake
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 72 , Issue 3 , May 2019 , pp. 702 - 720
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alcay, S. (2016). Analysis of ionospheric TEC variations response to the Mw 7·2 VAN-earthquake. Acta Geodynamica et Geomaterialia, 13(3), 257–262.Google Scholar
Alizadeh, M., Schuh, H., Todorova, S. and Schmidt, M. (2011). Global ionospheric maps of VTEC from GNSS, satellite altimetry and FORMOSAT-3/COSMIC data. Journal of Geodesy, 85(11), 975–987.Google Scholar
Arikan, F., Deviren, M. N., Lenk, O., Sezen, U. and Arikan, O. (2012). Observed Ionospheric Effects of 23 October 2011 Van, Turkey Earthquake. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 3(1), 1–8.Google Scholar
Auger, F. and Flandrin, P. (1995). Improving the readability of time-frequency and time-scale representations by the reassignment method. IEEE Transactions on signal processing, 43(5), 1068–1089.Google Scholar
Barka, A. and Kadinsky-Cade, K. (1988). Strike-slip fault geometry in Turkey and its influence on earthquake activity. Tectonics, 7(3), 663–684.Google Scholar
Boutiouta, S. and Belbachir, A. H. (2006). Magnetic Storms Effects on the Ionosphere TEC through GPS Data. Information Technology Journal, 5(5), 908–915.Google Scholar
Burrus, C. S. (1995). Multiband least squares FIR filter design. IEEE transactions on signal processing, 43(2), 412–421.Google Scholar
Calais, E. and Minster, J. B. (1995). GPS detection of ionospheric perturbations following the January 17, 1994, Northridge earthquake. Geophysical Research Letters, 22(9), 1045–1048.Google Scholar
Cander, L. R. and Mihajlovic, S. J. (1998). Forecasting ionospheric structure during the great geomagnetic storms. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 103(A1), 391–398.Google Scholar
Ciraolo, L., Azpilicueta, F., Brunini, C., Meza, A. and Radicella, S. M. (2007). Calibration errors on experimental slant total electron content (TEC) determined with GPS. Journal of Geodesy, 81(2), 111–120.Google Scholar
Çepni, M. S. and Şentürk, E. (2016). Geometric quality term for station-based total electron content estimation. Annals of geophysics, 59(1), A0107.Google Scholar
Davies, K. and Baker, D. M. (1965). Ionospheric effects observed around the time of the Alaskan earthquake of March 28, 1964. Journal of Geophysical Research, 70(9), 2251–2253.Google Scholar
Fejer, B. G. and Scherliess, L. (1995). Time dependent response of equatorial ionospheric electric fields to magnetospheric disturbances. Geophysical Research Letters, 22(7), 851–854.Google Scholar
Fidani, C. (2018). Improving earthquake forecasting by correlations between strong earthquakes and NOAA electron bursts. Terrestrial, Atmospheric & Oceanic Sciences, 29(2), 117–130.Google Scholar
Gabor, D. (1946). Theory of communication. Part 1: The analysis of information. Journal of the Institution of Electrical Engineers-Part III: Radio and Communication Engineering, 93(26), 429–441.Google Scholar
Gokhberg, M. B. (1983). Strong acoustic wave action. In ESA Special Publication, 195, 99–110.Google Scholar
Grinsted, A., Moore, J. C. and Jevrejeva, S. (2004). Application of the cross wavelet transform and wavelet coherence to geophysical time series. Nonlinear processes in geophysics, 11(5/6), 561–566.Google Scholar
Guo, J., Li, W., Yu, H., Liu, Z., Zhao, C. and Kong, Q. (2015a). Impending ionospheric anomaly preceding the Iquique Mw8·2 earthquake in Chile on 2014 April 1. Geophysical Journal International, 203(3), 1461–1470.Google Scholar
Guo, J., Li, W., Liu, X., Wang, J., Chang, X. and Zhao, C. (2015b). On TEC anomalies as precursor before Mw8·6 Sumatra earthquake and Mw6·7 Mexico earthquake on April 11, 2012. Geosciences Journal, 19(4), 721–730.Google Scholar
Harris, F. J. (1978). On the use of windows for harmonic analysis with the discrete Fourier transform. Proceedings of the IEEE, 66(1), 51–83.Google Scholar
Irmak, T. S., Doğan, B. and Karakaş, A. (2012). Source mechanism of the 23 October, 2011, Van (Turkey) earthquake (Mw =7 · 1) and aftershocks with its tectonic implications. Earth Planets Space, 64(11), 991–1003.Google Scholar
Klotz, S. and J ohnson, N.L. (1983). Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, 736.Google Scholar
Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake Research Institute Regional Earthquake-Tsunami Monitoring Center. (2011). http://www.koeri.boun.edu.tr/sismo/indexeng.htm.Google Scholar
Kutiev, I., Tsagouri, I., Perrone, L., Pancheva, D., Mukhtarov, P., Mikhailov, A., Lastovicka, J., Jakowski, N., Buresova, D., Blanch, E., Andonov, B., Altadill, D., Magdaleno, S., Parisi, M. and Torta, J.M. (2013). Solar activity impact on the Earth's upper atmosphere. Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate, 3, A06/1-21.Google Scholar
Le, H., Liu, L., Liu, J. Y., Zhao, B., Chen, Y., Wan, W. (2013). The ionospheric anomalies prior to the M9·0 Tohoku-Oki earthquake. Journal of Asian earth sciences, 62, 476–484.Google Scholar
Leonard, R. S. and Barnes, R. A. (1965). Observation of ionospheric disturbances following the Alaska earthquake. Journal of Geophysical Research, 70(5), 1250–1253.Google Scholar
Li, J., Meng, G., You, X., Zhang, R., Shi, H. and Han, Y. (2015). Ionospheric total electron content disturbance associated with May 12, 2008, Wenchuan earthquake. Geodesy and Geodynamics, 6(2), 126–134.Google Scholar
Liu, J. Y., Chen, Y. I., Pulinets, S. A., Tsai, Y. B. and Chuo, Y. J. (2000). Seismo-ionospheric signatures prior to M ≥6 · 0 Taiwan earthquakes. Geophysical Research Letters, 27(18), 3113–3116.Google Scholar
Liu, J. Y., Chen, Y. I., Chuo, Y. J., Tsai, H. F. (2001). Variations of ionospheric total electron content during the Chi-Chi earthquake. Geophysical Research Letters, 28(7), 1383–1386.Google Scholar
Liu, J. Y., Chen, Y. I., Chen, C. H., Liu, C. Y., Chen, C. Y., Nishihashi, M., Li, J. Z., Xia, Y. Q., Oyama, K. I., Hattori, K. and Lin, C. H. (2009). Seismoionospheric GPS total electron content anomalies observed before the 12 May 2008 Mw7·9 Wenchuan earthquake. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 114, A04320.Google Scholar
Liu, J., Chai, H. Z., Liu, C. J., Chen, K. and Chang, Y. F. (2011). Analysis based in CODE GIM of ionospheric anomaly before earthquake. Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics, 31, 39–42.Google Scholar
Mannucci, A. J., Wilson, B. D., Yuan, D. N., Ho, C. H., Lindqwister, U. J. and Runge, T. F. (1998). A global mapping technique for GPS-derived ionospheric total electron content measurements. Radio Science, 33(3), 565–582.Google Scholar
Menvielle, M. and Berthelier, A. (1991). The K-derived planetary indices: Description and availability. Reviews of Geophysics, 29(3), 415–432.Google Scholar
Molchanov, O. A., Kopytenko, Y. A., Voronov, P. M., Kopytenko, E. A., Matiashvili, T. G., Fraser-Smith, A. C. and Bernardi, A. (1992). Results of ULF magnetic field measurements near the epicenters of the Spitak (Ms =6 · 9) and Loma Prieta (Ms =7 · 1) earthquakes: Comparative analysis. Geophysical Research Letters, 19(13), 1495–1498.Google Scholar
Pulinets, S. A. (1998). Strong earthquake prediction possibility with the help of topside sounding from satellites. Advances in Space Research, 21(3), 455–458.Google Scholar
Pulinets, S. A., Legen'Ka, A. D., Gaivoronskaya, T. V., Depuev, V. K. (2003). Main phenomenological features of ionospheric precursors of strong earthquakes. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 65(16–18), 1337–1347.Google Scholar
Pulinets, S. and Boyarchuk, K. A. (2004). Ionospheric Precursors of Earthquakes. Springer, Berlin, Germany, 315.Google Scholar
Reilinger, R., McClusky, S., Vernant, P., Lawrence, S., Ergintav, S., Cakmak, R., Özener, H., Kadirov, F., Guliev, I., Stepanyan, R., Nadariya, M., Hahubia, G., Mahmoud, S., Sakr, K., Abdullah, A., Paradissis, D., Al-Aydrus, A., Prilepin, M., Guseva, T., Evren, E., Dmitrotsa, A., Filikov, S. V., Gomez, F., Al-Ghazzi, R. and Karam, G. (2006). GPS constraints on continental deformation in the Africa-Arabia-Eurasia continental collision zone and implications for the dynamics of plate interactions. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 111, B05411.Google Scholar
Roland, L. M., Vergnolle, M., Nocquet, J. M., Sladen, A., Dessa, J. X., Tavakoli, F., Nankali, H. R. and Cappa, F. (2013). Discriminating the tectonic and non-tectonic contributions in the ionospheric signature of the 2011, Mw7·1, dip-slip Van earthquake, Eastern Turkey. Geophysical Research Letters, 40(11), 2518–2522.Google Scholar
Schaer, S., Gurtner, W. and Feltens, J. (1998). IONEX: The ionosphere map exchange format version 1. In Proceedings of the IGS AC workshop, Darmstadt, Germany (Vol. 9, No. 11).Google Scholar
Schaer, S. (1999). Mapping and Predicting the Earth's Ionosphere Using the Global Positioning System. PhD Thesis. University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Smith, S. D. (2004). Computing unambiguous TEC and ionospheric delays using only carrier phase data from NOAA's CORS network. Proceedings of IEEE PLANS 2004, Monterey, California, April 26–29, 2004, 527–537.Google Scholar
Şentürk, E. and Çepni, M. S. (2018). Performance of different weighting and surface fitting techniques on station-wise TEC calculation and modified sine weighting supported by the sun effect. Journal of Spatial Science, https://doi.org/10.1080/14498596.2017.1417169.Google Scholar
Torrence, C. and Compo, G. P. (1998). A practical guide to wavelet analysis. Bulletin of the American Meteorological society, 79(1), 61–78.Google Scholar
Utkucu, M. (2013). 23 October 2011 Van, Eastern Anatolia, earthquake (Mw 7·1) and seismotectonics of Lake Van area. Journal of Seismology, 17(2), 783–805.Google Scholar
Weaver, P. F., Yuen, P. C., Prolss, G. W. and Furumoto, A. S. (1970). Acoustic coupling into the ionosphere from seismic waves of the earthquake at Kurile Islands on August 11, 1969. Nature, 226(5252), 1239–1241.Google Scholar
Yao, Y., Chen, P., Wu, H., Zhang, S. and Peng, W. (2012). Analysis of ionospheric anomalies before the 2011 Mw 9·0 Japan earthquake. Chinese Science Bulletin, 57(5), 500–510.Google Scholar
Yiyan, Z., Yun, W., Xuejun, Q. and Xunxie, Z. (2009). Ionospheric anomalies detected by ground-based GPS before the Mw7·9 Wenchuan earthquake of May 12, 2008, China. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 71(8–9), 959–966.Google Scholar
Yuen, P. C., Weaver, P. F., Suzuki, R. K. and Furumoto, A. S. (1969). Continuous, traveling coupling between seismic waves and the ionosphere evident in May 1968 Japan earthquake data. Journal of Geophysical Research, 74(9), 2256–2264.Google Scholar
Zolotov, O. V., Namgaladze, A. A. and Prokhotov, B. E. (2012). Total electron content disturbances prior to Great Tohoku March 11, 2011 and October 23, 2011 Turkey Van earthquakes and their physical interpretation. Proceedings of the MSTU, 15(3), 583–594.Google Scholar