Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T07:12:02.905Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Area Navigation and the Associated Display Methods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 January 2010

Karl E. Karwath
Karl E. Karwath
Affiliation:
(Deutsche Lufthansa)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It seems appropriate first to define and explain the term Area Navigation that lately has almost become a slogan in discussions on short-range radio navigation aids. The term itself does not convey much because virtually any radio navigation system permits navigation in the area of coverage of the associated ground stations; for a systematic classification of navigation systems, the term Area Navigation (herein called ANAV) is unsatisfactory. It can be understood only in the context of air traffic control requirements. For a long while the requirements of short-range navigation systems were almost exclusively governed by the needs of air traffic control systems based on an airways concept. When during recent years A.T.C. methods became less associated with a fixed route structure, especially in the terminal area, the requirements to be met by a navigation system changed accordingly. There now appears to be a general trend for area navigation capability to become available as a substitute for a point-to-point navigation system.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 24 , Issue 1 , January 1971 , pp. 105 - 120
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1U.S. Department of Commerce, Civil Aeronautics Administration.Google Scholar
2Distance Measuring Equipment and Offset Course Computer. Airways Operations Training Series, Bulletin No. 4. Washington, D.C., August 1950.Google Scholar
3Technical Development and Evaluation Center.Google Scholar
4McKnight, F. S.A Preliminary Study of Operational Advantages of Pictorial Navigation Displays. Technical Development Report No. 241. Indianapolis, June 1954.Google Scholar
5McCormick, R. E. and McKnight, F. S.. The Type V Pictorial Computer with Automatic Chart Selection, Part II: Technical and Operational Evaluation. Also: Payne, T. A. and A. C. Williams, Jr. Appendix: Recommended Features for Pictorial-Computer Displays for Air Navigation. Technical Development Report No. 243. Indianapolis, June 1954.Google Scholar
6Short Distance Radio Navigation. The Technical Division U.S. Air Coordination Committee. Washington, D.C., 1958.Google Scholar
7‘Arbitrary Course Navigation System.’ Collins Signal, 3, No. 4, S.8/9. Cedar Rapids, 1954.Google Scholar
8Area Coverage Displays and Course Line Computers Experimentation. Federal Aviation Agency, Systems Research & Development Service, Experimentation Division Report No. RD-64-19. Atlantic City, February 1964.Google Scholar
9Airborne Pictorial Displays of Navigational Information. U.K. Ministry of Defence, Board of Trade, National Air Traffic Control Services D.C.P. paper No. 59. London, August 1967.Google Scholar
10Angelos, T. G.Area navigation techniques in the terminal area. Proceedings of the RTCA Annual Assembly Meeting, Washington, D.C., September 1967.Google Scholar
11Roscoe, S. N.The Navigation Director: An Area Navigation System. Aerospace Group, Display Systems Department, Hughes Aircraft Company, Culver City, June 1968.Google Scholar
12Vickers, T. K. (1968). PD, ATC and the pilot, Flight Magazine, July 1968.Google Scholar
13Martin, R. W., Area navigation. Proceedings of the 1968 RTCA Annual Assembly Meeting, Washington, D.C., September 1968.Google Scholar
14Gilbert, G. A. (1968). VOR/DME area navigation. The Controller, 7, No. 4, 10.Google Scholar
15Woolsey, J. P. (1969). Narco introduces courseline computer. American Aviation, 9, 25.Google Scholar
16Approval of Area Navigation Systemsfor Use in the U.S. National Airspace System. U. S. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, Advisory Circular No. 90–45, Washington, August 1969.Google Scholar
17Bendix Avionics Division. Area Navigation Presentation Summary. Fort Lauderdale, 1970.Google Scholar
18Collins Radio Company. Proposal: Avionic Navigation System. Cedar Rapids, 1970.Google Scholar
19Arma Division of Ambac, Decca Navigator Co., Ltd. The Ambac Decca Modular Navigation System. 1970.Google Scholar
20Oakes, T. (1970). Airborne hardware. J. of A.T.C., March, p. 9.Google Scholar