Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T02:31:09.624Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Alternative Manoeuvres to Reduce Ship Scour

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 August 2020

Marcella Castells-Sanabra Open the ORCID record for Marcella Castells-Sanabra [Opens in a new window] ,
Anna Mujal-Colilles ,
Toni LLull ,
Jordi Moncunill ,
F.X. Martínez de Osés Open the ORCID record for F.X. Martínez de Osés [Opens in a new window]  and
Xavi Gironella
Marcella Castells-Sanabra*
Affiliation:
(Department of Engineering and Nautical Sciences, UPC-Barcelona Tech, Barcelona, Spain)
Anna Mujal-Colilles
Affiliation:
(Department of Engineering and Nautical Sciences, UPC-Barcelona Tech, Barcelona, Spain)
Toni LLull
Affiliation:
(Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, UPC-Barcelona Tech, Barcelona, Spain)
Jordi Moncunill
Affiliation:
(Department of Engineering and Nautical Sciences, UPC-Barcelona Tech, Barcelona, Spain)
F.X. Martínez de Osés
Affiliation:
(Department of Engineering and Nautical Sciences, UPC-Barcelona Tech, Barcelona, Spain)
Xavi Gironella
Affiliation:
(Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, UPC-Barcelona Tech, Barcelona, Spain)
*
(E-mail: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Scouring and sedimentation effects on the seabed induced by ship propellers during ship manoeuvring near harbour structures affect both structure stability and ship manoeuvring capabilities. This contribution proposes solutions at an operational level using the automatic identification system (AIS) and a bridge simulator. Two new alternative manoeuvres were designed and tested on a bridge simulator to obtain expected maximum scour depth and the results were compared with that of real manoeuvres (i) using mooring lines, and (ii) with tug assistance. A total of 42 test scenarios combining several manoeuvres and meteorological conditions were reproduced. Results confirmed a clear reduction in erosion depth with the alternative manoeuvres, with total reduction when using the tugboat. The presented methodology can be very useful to port authorities to prevent the effects of ship erosion on harbour infrastructures.

Keywords

Automatic Identification SystemManoeuvrabilityHarbourPropulsionShip Behaviour
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 74 , Issue 1 , January 2021 , pp. 125 - 142
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aarsæther, K. G. and Moan, T. (2007). Combined maneuvering analysis, AIS and full-mission simulation. TransNav?: International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, 1, 31–36.Google Scholar
Aarsæther, K. G. and Moan, T. (2009). Estimating navigation patterns from AIS. Journal of Navigation, 62(04), 587. doi:10.1017/S0373463309990129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergh, H. and Magnussen, N. (1987). Propeller erosion and protection methods used in ferry terminals in the port of Stockholm. Bulletin of the Permanent International Association of Navigation Congress (PIANC), 58, 112–120.Google Scholar
Blaauw, H. G. and van de Kaa, E. J. (1978). Erosion of Bottom and Sloping Banks Caused by the Screw Race of Manoeuvring Ships, 7th International Harbour Congress, Antwerp, Belgium. Publication No. 202, pp. 1–12. Delft Hydraulics Lab, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Castells, M., Martinez, F. J., Martin, A., Mujal-Colilles, A. and Gironella, X. (2017). Tools for Evaluation Quay Toe Scouring Induced by Vessel Propellers in Harbour Basins During the Docking and Undocking Manoeuvring. Safety of Sea Transportation: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation (TransNav 2017), June 21–23, 2017, Gdynia, Poland. CRC Press, The Netherlands, pp. 61–66. doi:10.1201/9781315099088-10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chait, S. (1987). Undermining of quaywalls at South African ports due to the use of bow thrusters and other propeller units. Bulletin of the Permanent International Association of Navigation Congress (PIANC), 58, 107–110.Google Scholar
Fuehrer, M., Pohl, H. and Römish, K. (1987). Propeller jet erosion and stability criteria for bottom protections of various constructions. Bulletin of the Permanent International Association of Navigation Congress (PIANC), 58.Google Scholar
Greidanus, H., Alvarez, M., Eriksen, T. and Gammieri, V. (2016). Completeness and accuracy of a wide-area maritime situational picture based on automatic ship reporting systems. Journal of Navigation, 69(1), 156–168. doi:10.1017/S0373463315000582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamill, G., Johnston, H. T. and Stewart, D. (1999). Propeller wash scour near quay walls. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal and Ocean Engineering, 125(4), 170–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamill, G., Ryan, D. and Johnston, H. T. (2009). Effect of rudder angle on propeller wash velocities at a seabed. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Maritime Engineering, 162(1), 27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkswood, M. G., Lafeber, F. H. and Hawkswood, G. M. (2014). Berth scour protection for modern vessels. In PIANC World Congress, San Francisco, USA, 2014.Google Scholar
Hsu, W. K. K. (2015). Assessing the safety factors of ship berthing operations. Journal of Navigation, 68(3), 576–588. doi:10.1017/S0373463314000861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Llull, T., Mujal-Colilles, A., Castells-Sanabra, M., Gironella, X., Martinez, F. J., Martin, A. and Sanchez-arcilla, A. (2018). Hybrid Tool to Prevent Ship Propeller Erosion. In Proceedings of the ASME 2018 37th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering (OMAE2018), June 17–22, 2018, Madrid, Spain. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), Vol. 4, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Llull, T., Mujal-Colilles, A., Castells-Sanabra, M. and Gironella, X. (2020). Composite methodology to prevent ship propeller erosion. Ocean Engineering, 195, 106751. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mujal-Colilles, A., Gironella, X., Sanchez-Arcilla, A., Puig-Polo, C. and Garcia, M. (2017a). Erosion caused by propeller jets in a low energy harbour basin. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 55(1), 121–128. doi:10.1080/00221686.2016.1252801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mujal-Colilles, A., Gironella, X., Sanchez-Arcilla, A., Puig-Polo, C. and Garcia, M. (2017b). Study of the bed velocity induced by twin propellers. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering, 143(5), 04017013. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)WW.1943-5460.0000382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mujal-Colilles, A., Llull, A., Castells, M., Gironella, X., Martinez, F. J. and Sanchez-Arcilla, A. (2018a). Ship manoeuvring effects on propeller induced erosion. In International Conference on the Application of Physical Modelling to Port and Coastal Protection, pp. 1–7. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/2117/118488.Google Scholar
Mujal-Colilles, A., Castells-Sanabra, M., Llull, T., Gironella, X. and Martinez, F. J. (2018b). Stern twin-propeller effects on harbor. Water, 10(w), doi:10.3390/w10111571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pallotta, G., Vespe, M. and Bryan, K. (2013). Vessel pattern knowledge discovery from AIS data: A framework for anomaly detection and route prediction. Entropy, 15(12), 2218–2245. doi:10.3390/e15062218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PIANC. (1980). Permanent International Association of Navigation Congresses, Optimal Lay-Out and Dimensions for the Adjustment to Large Ships of Maritime Fairways in Shallow Seas, Seastraits and Maritime Waterways. International Commission for the Reception of Large Ships, Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
PIANC. (2015). Permanent International Association of Navigation Congresses, Guidelines for Protecting Berthing Structures from Scour Caused by Ships. Report no. 180. The World Association for Waterborne Transportation Infrastructure, Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
Römisch, K. and Hering, W. (2002). Input data of propeller induced velocities for dimensioning of bed protection near quay walls. Bulletin of the Permanent International Association of Navigation Congresses, 109, 5–11.Google Scholar
Schokking, L. A., Janssen, P. C. and Verhagen, H. J. (2003). Bowthruster-induced damage. Bulletin of the Permanent International Association of Navigation Congress (PIANC), 114, 53–63.Google Scholar
Silveira, P. A. M., Teixeira, A. P. and Soares, C. G. (2013). Use of AIS data to characterise marine traffic patterns and ship collision risk off the coast of Portugal. Journal of Navigation, 66(6), 879–898. doi:10.1017/S0373463313000519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Symonds, A., Britton, G., Donald, J. and Loehr, H. (2017). Predicting propeller wash and bed disturbance by recreational vessels at marinas. Bulletin of the Permanent International Association of Navigation Congress PIANC 2016 Yearbook, 70–80. Available at: https://www.pianc.org/uploads/files/Yearbook/Yearbook-2016/Technical-Articles.pdf.Google Scholar
Tan, R. Ẏ. and Yüksel, Y. (2018). Seabed scour induced by a propeller jet. Ocean Engineering, 160, 132–142. doi:10.1016/J.OCEANENG.2018.04.076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsinker, G. P. (1995). Marine Structures Engineering: Specialized Applications. Boston, MA: Springer US. doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-2081-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar