Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T08:23:20.374Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The AIS-Assisted Collision Avoidance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 October 2009

Hua-Zhi Hsu ,
Neil A. Witt ,
John B. Hooper  and
Anne P. McDermott
Hua-Zhi Hsu*
Affiliation:
(National Kaohsiung Marine University, Taiwan)
Neil A. Witt
Affiliation:
(University of Plymouth, UK)
John B. Hooper
Affiliation:
(University of Plymouth, UK)
Anne P. McDermott
Affiliation:
(University of Plymouth, UK)
*
(Email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Shipborne AIS provides independent traffic information to the bridge lookout on duty. This study examines the effect of AIS enhanced bridge lookout operation by means of a ship simulator. The two groups of participants, all qualified British deep sea deck officers, undertook identical simulation scenarios, but one group had the AIS on and the other did not. Significant differences were found between the two groups in reading the targets' privileged status and handling the head-on situation. Those with AIS information were found to avoid possible collisions faster than the group for whom AIS information was not available.

Keywords

AISRadarCollision AvoidanceSimulation
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 62 , Issue 4 , October 2009 , pp. 657 - 670
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Berking, B. and Pfeiffer, J. (1995). Stabilizing the Radar Picture and ARPA Data. The Journal of Navigation 48, 29–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvert, E. S. (1960). Manoeuvres to Ensure the Avoidance of Collision. The Journal of Navigation 13, 127–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvert, E. S. (1961). A Comparison of Two Systems for Avoiding Collision. The Journal of Navigation 14, 379–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cockcroft, A. N. (1972). A Manoeuvring Diagram for Avoiding Collisions at Sea. The Journal of Navigation 25, 105–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dytham, C. (2003). Choosing and using statistics: a biologist's guide. Oxford, Blackwell Science.Google Scholar
Greene, J. and D'Oliveira, M. (1982). Learning to use statistical tests in psychology: a student's guide. Milton Keynes, Philadelphia, Open University Press.Google Scholar
Harati-Mokhtari, A., Wall, A., et al. (2007). Automatic Identification System (AIS): Data Reliability and Human Error Implications. The Journal of Navigation 60, 373–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IMO (2002). Resolution A.917 (22): Guidelines for the onboard operational use of shipborne Automatic Identification Systems (AIS). London, IMO: 14.Google Scholar
IMO (2003). International Conference on Revision of the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972. London, IMO.Google Scholar
Ishioka, Y., Nakamura, S., et al. (1996). A study on a support of decision-making for collision avoidance in INS. Marine Simulation and Ship Manoeuvrability. M. S. Chislett. Rotterdam Brookfield, A.A. Balkema: 49–58.Google Scholar
Lewison, G. R. G. (1978). The Risk of a Ship Encounter Leading to a Collision. The Journal of Navigation 31 384–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Research Council (US) (1996). Simulated voyages: using simulation technology to train and license mariners. Washington, D.C., National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Redfern, A. (1993). Watchkeeper collision avoidance behaviour. Plymouth, Marine Directorate, Department of Transport.Google Scholar
Valentine, R. D. (1985). Marine Maneuvering Simulation. Marine Simulation, Munich, Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar