Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T03:59:45.761Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Practices of development assistance and climate change mitigation in reshaping the Mozambican REDD+ strategy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2021

Pekka Virtanen  and
Eero Palmujoki
Pekka Virtanen*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Social Sciences, 40014 University of Jyväskylä, Finland
Eero Palmujoki*
Affiliation:
School of Management and Business, 33014 Tampere University, Finland
*
Email: [email protected]
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper studies how the practices of climate change governance and development assistance have reshaped the Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD) process in Mozambique. We look at how the original goals of the Mozambican REDD+ strategy changed in the interplay of different governance-related practices, both those originating locally and nationally, and those coming from international organisations. The paper is based on the frameworks of multilevel governance and practice theory. We identify six combinations of practices that are relevant in the REDD+ programmes and projects. Three of them are incorporated in the general idea of sustainability, including practices of promoting environmental conservation, economic growth and social justice/development, while the remaining three practices are connected to climate-mitigation practices, for which the frame is defined in the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.

Keywords

Climate change mitigationdevelopment assistancelandscape approachMozambiquepractice theoryREDD+
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Modern African Studies , Volume 58 , Issue 4 , December 2020 , pp. 649 - 670
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adler, E. & Pouliot, V.. 2011. ‘International practices’, International Theory 3, 1: 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agence Française de Développement (AFD) 2012. Climate change adaptation in the Quirimbas National Park. <http://www.afd.fr/webdav/site/afd/shared/PORTAIL/PAYS/MOZAMBIQUE/projects/Quirimbas%20FFEM%2012%202012%20engl.pdf>, accessed 10.5.2017.,+accessed+10.5.2017.>Google Scholar
Angelsen, A., Brockhaus, M., Sunderlin, W.D. & Vercho, L.V., eds. 2012. Analyzing REDD+: challenges and choices. Bogor: CIFOR.Google Scholar
Arts, B., Behagel, J., Turnhout, E., de Koning, J. & van Bommel, S.. 2014. ‘A practice based approach to forest governance’, Forest Policy and Economics 49: 4–11.Google Scholar
Arts, B., Kleinschmit, D. & Pülzl, H.. 2016. ‘Forest Governance: connecting global to local practices, in Spraargaren, G., Lammers, M. & Weenik, D., eds. Practice Theory and Research: exploring the dynamics of social life. Abingdon: Routledge, 202–28.Google Scholar
van Asselt, H. 2011. ‘Integrating biodiversity in the climate regime's forest rules: options and tradeoffs in greening REDD design’, Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 20, 2: 139–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayana, A.N., Vandenabeele, N. & Arts, B.. 2017. ‘Performance of participatory forest management in Ethiopia: institutional arrangement versus local practices’, Critical Policy Studies 11, 1: 19–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baffoni, S. & Haggith, M.. 2017. ‘A land grab for pulp: new mill project by Portucel Mozambique.’ Environmental Paper Network.Google Scholar
Banjade, M.R. 2012. ‘Discourse and discursive practices over timber in Nepal’, Journal of Forest and Livelihood 10, 1: 58–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behagel, J.H., Arts, B. & Turnhout, E.. 2017. ‘Beyond argumentation: a practice-based approach to environmental policy’, Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, <http:dx.doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2017.1295841>.Google Scholar
Betsil, M.M. & Bulkeley, H.. 2006. ‘Cities and the multilevel governance of global climate change’, Global Governance 12, 2: 141–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biermann, F., Pattberg, P., van Asselt, H. & Fariborz, Z.. 2009. ‘The fragmentation of global governance architectures: a framework for analysis’, Global Environmental Politics 9, 4: 14–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bleyer, M., Kniivilä, M., Horne, P., Sitoe, A. & Falcão, M.. 2016. ‘Socio-economic impacts of private land use investment on rural communities: industrial forest plantations in Niassa, Mozambique’, Land Use Policy 51: 281–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulkeley, H., Davies, A., Evans, B., Gibbs, D., Kern, K. & Theobald, K.. 2003. ‘Environmental governance and transnational municipal networks in Europe’. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 5, 3: 235–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, S., Wilder, M., Millar, I. & Dibley, A.. 2015. ‘Implementing REDD+ under the UNFCCC: basic requirements and guidance for developing national policy and legal frameworks’, Carbon & Climate Law Review 9, 2: 101–12.Google Scholar
den Besten, J.W., Arts, B. & Verkooijen, P.. 2014. ‘The evolution of REDD+: an analysis of discursive-institutional dynamics’, Environmental Science and Policy 35: 40–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doherty, E. & Schoeder, H.. 2011. ‘Forest tenure and multi-level governance in avoiding deforestation under REDD+’, Global Environmental Politics 11, 4: 66–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
du Preez, M-L. 2013. Governing Southern Africa's Forests: the case of REDD+. Maastricht: ECDPM.Google Scholar
ECOSOC. 2014. ‘Trends and Progress in International Development Cooperation.’ Report of the Secretary-General. Development Cooperation Policy Branch Office for ECOSOC Support and Coordination. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations.Google Scholar
Etc Terra. 2016. ‘Background study for the Zambézia Integrated Landscapes Management Program.’ Report for Government of Mozambique and FCPF. Paris: Etc Terra.Google Scholar
Fairbairn, M. 2013. ‘Indirect dispossession: domestic power imbalances and foreign access to land in Mozambique’, Development and Change 44, 2: 335–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fundação Amazonas Sustentavel (FAS). 2008. Juma Sustainable Development Reserve: The First REDD Project in the Brazilian Amazon. Manaus: FAS.Google Scholar
Forest Carbon Partnership Facility (FCPF). 2014. ‘REDD+ Readiness Progress Fact Sheet: Mozambique, May 2014.’ <www.forestcarbonpartnership.org/sites/fcp/files/2014/June/FCPF>, accessed 17.8. 2014.,+accessed+17.8.+2014.>Google Scholar
Forsyth, T. 2009. ‘Multilevel, multiactor governance in REDD+: participation, integration and coordination’, in Angelsen, A., ed. Realizing REDD+. Bogor: CIFOR, 113–22.Google Scholar
Gupta, A., Pistorius, T. & Vijge, M.J.. 2016. ‘Managing fragmentation in global environmental governance: the REDD+ Partnership as bridge organization’, International Environmental Agreements 16: 355–74.Google Scholar
Haug, C.C. & Gupta, J.. 2013. ‘The emergence of REDD on the global policy agenda’, in Gupta, J., van der Grijp, N. & Kuik, O., eds. Climate Change, Forests and REDD: lessons for institutional design. Abingdon: Routledge, 77–98.Google Scholar
Haywood, C., Wardell, D.A., Cordonier Segger, M-C. & Holmgren, P.. 2015. ‘Legal frameworks for implementing REDD+ in Zambia, Mozambique and Tanzania: opportunities for a sustainable landscape approach’, Carbon and Climate Law Review 9, 2: 130–42.Google Scholar
IIED. 2009. ‘Preparing for REDD in dryland forests: investigating the options and potential synergy for REDD payments in the miombo eco-region.’ Mozambique country study. London: IIED.Google Scholar
IIED. 2012. ‘South-south REDD: a Brazil-Mozambique initiative for zero deforestation with pan-African relevance.’ Final report. London: IIED.Google Scholar
IIED. 2013. Linha da referência, monitoria, relatório e verificação para o REDD+ em Moçambique. London: IIED.Google Scholar
IIED. 2015 a. ‘Testing REDD+ in the Beira Corridor: who drives land use and land-use change, and why?’ London: IIED.Google Scholar
IIED 2015 b. ‘Sustainable agriculture for small-scale farmers in Mozambique: a scoping report.’ IIED Country report. London: IIED.Google Scholar
Impacto. 2014. Projecto florestal da Zambézia: Relatório do estudo de impacto ambiental. <http://www.portucelmocambique.com/var/ezdemo_site/storage/original/application/4c6d4fda3a078a913cfdf97b7f850e41.pdf>, accessed 10.5.2017.,+accessed+10.5.2017.>Google Scholar
International Finance Corporation (IFC). 2014. Portucel e IFC iniciam parceria financeira para criar Empregos e Desenvolvimento Sustentável através do sector florestal em Moçambique. <https://pressroom.ifc.org/all/pages/PressDetail.aspx?ID=17946>, accessed 10.5.2017.,+accessed+10.5.2017.>Google Scholar
Jänicke, M. 2017. ‘The multi-level sysytem of global climate governance – the model and its current state’, Environmental Policy and Governance 27: 108–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jansen, L., Bagnoli, M. & Focacci, M.. 2008. ‘Analysis of land-cover/change dynamics in Manica Province in Mozambique in a period of transition (1990–2004)’, Forest Ecology and Management 254: 308–26.Google Scholar
Jindal, R., Kerr, J. & Carter, S.. 2012. ‘Reducing poverty through carbon forestry? Impacts of the N'hambita Community Carbon Project in Mozambique’, World Development 40, 10: 2123–35.Google Scholar
Kaarhus, R. 2011. ‘Agricultural growth corridors equals land grabbing? Models, roles and accountabilities in a Mozambican case.’ Paper presented at the conference Global Land Grabbing, IDS, University of Sussex, 6–8 April 2011.Google Scholar
Kaarhus, R. 2018. ‘Land, investments and public-private partnership: what happened to the Beira Agricultural Growth Corridor in Mozambique?’, Journal of Modern African Studies 56, 1: 87–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kill, J. 2013. Carbon Discredited: Why the EU should steer clear of forest carbon offsets. Brussels: FERN.Google Scholar
Korhonen-Kurki, K., Brockhaus, M., Sehring, J., Di Greggio, M., Assembe-Mvondo, S., Babon, A., Bekele, M., Benn, V., Gebara, M.F., Kambire, H.F., Kengoum, F., Maharani, C., Menton, M., Meoliono, M., Ochieng, R., Paudel, N.S., Pham, T.T., Dkamela, G.P. & Sitoe, A.. 2019. ‘What drives policy change for REDD+? A qualitative comparative analysis of the interplay between institutional and policy arena factors’, Climate Policy 19, 3: 315–28.Google Scholar
Lederer, M. 2012. ‘The practice of carbon markets’, Environmental Politics 21: 640–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministério da Terra, Ambiente e Desenvolvimento Rural (MITADER). 2016 a. Estratégia Nacional para a redução de emissões de desmatamento e degradação florestal, conservação de florestas e aumento de reservas de carbono através de florestas (REDD+) 2016–2030. Maputo: MITADER.Google Scholar
Ministério da Terra, Ambiente e Desenvolvimento Rural (MITADER). 2016 b. Plano de acção da estratégia de REDD+ 2016–2030. Maputo: MITADER.Google Scholar
Ministry of Coordination of Environmental Affairs (MICOA). 2011. ‘Proposta de Estratégia de Redução de Emissões por Desmatamento e Degradação Florestal.’ (Mimeo).Google Scholar
Mutasa, M. 2014. ‘Review of REDD+ and carbon-forestry projects in RFGI countries.’ RFGI Working Paper No. 2. Dakar: CODESRIA.Google Scholar
Naess, L.O., Newell, P., Newsham, A., Phillips, J., Quan, J. & Tanner, T.. 2015. ‘Climate policy meets national development contexts: insights from Kenya and Mozambique’, Global Environmental Change, 35: 534–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, T. 2016. ‘From REDD+ forests to green landscapes? Analyzing the emerging integrated landscape approach discourse in the UNFCCC’, Forest Policy and Economics 73: 177–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD. 2009. Better Aid. Managing Aid – Practices of DAC Member Countries. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Okereke, C. & Dooley, K.. 2010. ‘Principles of Justice in Proposals and Policy Approaches to Avoided Deforestation: Towards a Post-Kyoto Climate Agreement’, Global Climate Change 20, 1: 82–95.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. 2010. ‘Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change’, Global Environmental Change 20: 550–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmujoki, E. 2017. ‘Institutions, institutional practices, and global climate change governance. The case of REDD+’, in Cadman, T., Maguire, R. & Sampford, C., eds. Governing the Climate Change Regime: institutional integrity and integrity system. London: Routledge, 70–92.Google Scholar
Palmujoki, E. & Virtanen, P.. 2016. ‘Global, national, or market? Emerging Redd+ governance practices in Mozambique and Tanzania’, Global Environmental Politics 16, 1: 59–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pistorius, T. 2012. ‘From RED to REDD+: the evolution of a forest-based mitigation approach for developing countries’, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 4, 6: 638–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plan Vivo. 2015. Project update – Mozambique: Sofala Community Carbon Project to close in 2015. Edinburgh: Plan Vivo Foundation.Google Scholar
Portucel Moçambique. 2016. Projecto Portucel Moçambique: Ponto de situação – April 2016. <www.portucelmocambique.com>, accessed 14.3.2017.,+accessed+14.3.2017.>Google Scholar
Portucel Moçambique. 2017. Maputo: Comunicado. <http://www.portucelmocambique.com/var/ezdemo_site/storage/original/application/d61e5718ea5aba3e34c8e9a8c4dc8dbb.pdf>, accessed 16.6.2018.,+accessed+16.6.2018.>Google Scholar
Quan, J., Naess, L., Newsham, A., Sitoe, A. & Fernandez, M.. 2017. ‘The political economy of REDD+ in Mozambique: implications for climate compatible development’, in Nunan, F., ed. Making Climate Compatible Development Happen. London: Routledge, 151–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Republic of Mozambique (RM). 2013 a. ‘Decree 70/2013. Regulating procedures for project approval for the reduction of emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+).’ Maputo: Official Journal of the Republic of Mozambique.Google Scholar
Republic of Mozambique (RM). 2013 b. ‘Forest Carbon Partnership Facility Mozambique Readiness Preparation Proposal.’ January 2013.Google Scholar
Republic of Mozambique (RM). 2018. ‘Decreto n.o 23/2018. Regulamento para programas e projectos inerentes à redução de emissões por desmatamento e degradação florestal, conservação e aumento de reservas de carbono (REDD+).’ Maputo: Official Journal of the Republic of Mozambique.Google Scholar
Saito-Jensen, M. 2015. Theories and Methods for the Study of Multilevel Environmental Governance. Bogor: CIFOR.Google Scholar
Sendeco2. 2018. <https://www.sendeco2.com/es/precios-co2>, accessed 20.3.2019.,+accessed+20.3.2019.>Google Scholar
Sitoe, A., Salomão, A. & Wertz–Kanounnikoff, S.. 2012. ‘The context of REDD+ in Mozambique: drivers, agents and institutions.’ Bogor: CIFOR.Google Scholar
Southern African Development Community (SADC) 2011. ‘A SADC support programme on reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD), 2012–2015.’ Gaborone: SADC.Google Scholar
Southern African Development Community (SADC). 2015. ‘REDD+ nas florestas de Mopane da África Austral.’ Gaborone: SADC.Google Scholar
Streck, C. 2019. ‘Shades of REDD+: Bridging the National vs Project Divide.’ Ecosystem Marketplace. <https://www.ecosystemmarketplace.com/articles/shades-of-redd-bridging-the-national-vs-projectdivide>, accessed 18.8.2020.,+accessed+18.8.2020.>Google Scholar
Turnhout, E., Gupta, A., Wheatherley-Singh, J., Vijge, M.J., de Koning, J., Visseren-Hamakers, I.J., Herold, M. & Lederer, M.. 2017. ‘Envisioning REDD+ in a post-Paris era: between evolving expectations and current practice’, WIREs Climate Change 8: 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP). 2012. ‘South-South collaboration for REDD+: a Brazil-Mozambique partnership.’ Nairobi: UNEP. <http://www.unep.org/south-south-cooperation/case/casefiles.aspx?csno=52>, accessed 22.1.2017.,+accessed+22.1.2017.>Google Scholar
University of Edinburgh (UE). 2008. ‘Miombo community land use & carbon management: Nhambita pilot project.’ Final report. Edinburgh: UE.Google Scholar
UT-REDD & MITADER. 2016. ‘Forest Investment Plan (FIP) in Mozambique, Version 3.1.’ Maputo: MITADER.Google Scholar
Voigt, C. & Ferreira, F.. 2015. ‘The Warsaw Framework for REDD+: implications for national implementation and access to result-based finance’, Carbon and Climate Law Review 9, 2: 113–29.Google Scholar
Willis, K. 2005. Theories and Practices of Development. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2015. ‘MZ –FCPC REDD+ Readiness preparation support.’ Project Information Document (PID). Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2017. ‘Project appraisal document on proposed credit from the IDA, Proposed loan from the Strategic Climate Fund and a proposed grant from the Strategic Climate Fund to the Republic of Mozambique for the Mozambique Forest Investment Project (MOZFIP).’ Report No. PAD1913. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar