Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-w79xw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-19T21:51:00.484Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Neither despotic nor civil: the legitimacy of chieftaincy in its relationship with the ANC and the state in KwaZulu-Natal (South Africa)*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 February 2016

Mario Krämer
Mario Krämer*
Affiliation:
Institut für Ethnologie, Universität zu Köln, Albertus-Magnus-Platz, 50923 Köln, Germany
*
Email:[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Are South African chiefs rural and peri-urban despots or have they transformed to legitimate representatives of local interests in the post-apartheid era? This article argues that the legitimacy of chieftaincy in KwaZulu-Natal is not only based on constitutional and legal recognition, but that chieftaincy may rely on different forms of ‘basic legitimacy’. Chieftaincy is neither despotic nor civil but occupies an intermediary position between local citizens and the state. This junction position provides chiefs with specific opportunities to gain power but also requires a navigation between cooperation and conflict in the relationship with the ANC and the state.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Modern African Studies , Volume 54 , Issue 1 , March 2016 , pp. 117 - 143
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This article is a revised version of a paper presented to the Emory Institute of African Studies Conference ‘Twenty Years Later: South Africa and the Post-Apartheid Condition’ (17.–19.4.2014) and to the African Studies Workshop at Harvard University (11.2.2015). I would like to thank Clifton Crais, Loren Landau, George Paul Meiu and two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments and critique. I am particularly grateful to the residents of KwaXimba and eThekwini Municipality who made time for me and took an active interest in my research.

References

REFERENCES

Baldwin, K. 2013. ‘Why vote with the chief? Political connections and public goods provision in Zambia’, American Journal of Political Science 57, 4: 794–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beall, J. 2006. ‘Cultural weapons: traditions, inventions and the transition to democratic governance in Metropolitan Durban’, Urban Studies 43, 3: 457–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beinart, W. 2014. ‘Verwoerd, Zuma and the Chiefs’, Custom Contested 1.8.2014 <http://www.customcontested.co.za/verwoerd-zuma-chiefs/>, accessed 9.9.2014.,+accessed+9.9.2014.>Google Scholar
Bonnin, D. 2004. ‘Understanding the legacies of political violence: an examination of political conflict in Mpumalanga township, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa’. Crisis States Programme Working Papers, Development Studies Institute, London School of Economics and Political Science, 44.Google Scholar
Claassens, A. 2014. ‘Land claims could blow up in Zuma's face’, Custom Contested 4.9.2014 <http://www.customcontested.co.za/land-claims-blow-zumas-face/>, accessed 9.9.2014., accessed 9.9.2014.' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Claassens,+A.2014.+‘Land+claims+could+blow+up+in+Zuma's+face’,+Custom+Contested+4.9.2014+,+accessed+9.9.2014.>Google Scholar
Comaroff, J.L. & Comaroff, J.. 2009. Ethnicity, Inc. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, S.E. 2005. ‘Chiefs, kings, corporatization, and democracy: a South African case study’, Brown Journal of World Affairs XII, 1: 125–37.Google Scholar
Crais, C. 2006. ‘Custom and the politics of sovereignty in South Africa’, Journal of Social History 39, 3: 721–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department of Traditional Affairs, Republic of South Africa. 2013. ‘Acceptance speech by President Jacob Zuma on the occasion of King Makhado Bravery Award, University of Venda Stadium, 8.8.2013’ <http://www.dta.gov.za/index.php/speeches/54-others/113-acceptance-speech-by-president-jacob-zuma.html>, accessed 1.3.2014.,+accessed+1.3.2014.>Google Scholar
Fokwang, J. 2009. Mediating Legitimacy: chieftaincy and democratisation in two African chiefdoms. Mankon, Bamenda: Langaa.Google Scholar
Friedrich, P. 1968. ‘The legitimacy of a cacique’, in Swartz, M.J., ed. Local-level politics. Social and cultural perspectives. Chicago, IL: Aldine, 243–69.Google Scholar
Gumede, W.M. 2008. ‘Briefing. South Africa: Jacob Zuma and the difficulties of consolidating South Africa's democracy’, African Affairs 107, 427: 261–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guy, J. 2013. Theophilus Shepstone and the Forging of Natal: African autonomy and settler colonialism in the making of traditional authority. Scottsville: University of KwaZulu-Natal Press.Google Scholar
Khan, S., Lootvoet, B. & Vawda, S.. 2006. ‘Transcending traditional forms of governance: prospects for co-operative governance and service delivery in Durban's tribal authority areas’, Transformation 62: 84–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krämer, M. 2007. Violence as Routine: transformations of local-level politics and the disjunction between centre and periphery in KwaZulu-Natal (South Africa). Köln: Köppe.Google Scholar
Krämer, M. 2014. ‘Democratisation between violent conflict and the resurgence of chieftaincy. Local transformations of a travelling model in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa’, in Behrends, A., Park, S.-J. & Rottenburg, R., eds. Travelling Models in African Conflict Management: translating technologies of social ordering. Leiden: Brill, 167–80.Google Scholar
Kyed, H.M. & Buur, L.. 2007. ‘Introduction. Traditional authority and democratization in Africa’, in Buur, L. & Kyed, H.M., eds. State Recognition and Democratization in Sub-Saharan Africa: a new dawn for traditional authorities? Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 1–28.Google Scholar
Lehman, H.P. 2007. ‘Deepening democracy? Demarcation, traditional authorities, and municipal elections in South Africa’, Social Science Journal 44, 2: 301–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lentz, C. 1998. ‘The chief, the mine captain and the politician: legitimating power in Northern Ghana’, Africa 68, 1: 46–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LiPuma, E. & Koelble, T.A.. 2009. ‘Deliberative democracy and the politics of traditional leadership in South Africa: a case of despotic domination or democratic deliberation?’, Journal of Contemporary African Studies 27, 2: 201–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Logan, C. 2009. ‘Selected chiefs, elected councillors and hybrid democrats: popular perspectives on the co-existence of democracy and traditional authority’, Journal of Modern African Studies 47, 1: 101–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Logan, C. 2013. ‘The roots of resilience: exploring popular support for African traditional authorities’, African Affairs 112, 448: 353–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maloka, T. & Gordon, D.. 1996. ‘Chieftainship, civil society, and the political transition in South Africa’, Critical Sociology 22, 3: 37–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mamdani, M. 1996. Citizen and Subject: contemporary Africa and the legacy of late colonialism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mamdani, M. 2013. Define and Rule: native as political identity. Johannesburg: Wits University Press.Google Scholar
Mandela, N. 1994. Long Walk to Freedom. New York, NY: Back Bay Books.Google Scholar
Mathieson, S. & Attwell, D.. 1998. ‘Between ethnicity and nationhood. Shaka Day and the struggle over Zuluness in post-apartheid South Africa’, in Bennett, D., ed. Multicultural States: rethinking difference and identity. London: Routledge, 111–24.Google Scholar
McClendon, T.V. 2010. White Chief, Black Lords: Shepstone and the colonial state in Natal, South Africa, 1845–1878. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar
Myers, J.C. 2008. Indirect Rule in South Africa: tradition, modernity, and the costuming of political power. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar
Ntsebeza, L. 2005. Democracy Compromised: chiefs and the politics of the land in South Africa. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ntsebeza, L. 2011. ‘Traditional authorities and democracy. Are we back to apartheid?’, in Ruiters, G., ed. The Fate of the Eastern Cape: history, politics and social policy. Scottsville: University of KwaZulu-Natal Press, 75–92.Google Scholar
Oomen, B. 2005. Chiefs in South Africa: law, power and culture in the post-apartheid era. Oxford: James Currey; Pietermaritzburg: University of KwaZulu-Natal Press; New York, NY: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popitz, H. 1992. Phänomene der Macht. Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar
Robins, S. 2008. ‘Sexual politics and the Zuma rape trial’, Journal of Southern African Studies 34, 2: 411–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouveroy van Nieuwaal, E.A.B.v. 1999. ‘Chieftaincy in Africa. Three facets of a hybrid role’, in Dijk, R.v. & Rouveroy van Nieuwaal, E.A.B.v., eds. African Chieftaincy in a New Socio-political Landscape. Hamburg: LIT, 21–47.Google Scholar
Schlichte, K. 2009. In the Shadow of Violence: the politics of armed groups. Frankfurt: Campus.Google Scholar
Spear, T. 2003. ‘Neo-traditionalism and the limits of invention in British colonial Africa’, Journal of African History 44, 1: 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trotha, T.v. 1994. ‘Streng, aber gerecht – hart, aber tüchtig. Über Formen von Basislegitimität und ihre Ausprägungen am Beginn staatlicher Herrschaft’, in Möhlig, W.J.G. & Trotha, T.v, eds. Legitimation von Herrschaft und Recht. 3. Kolloquium deutsch-französischer Rechtsanthropologen/La légitimation du pouvoir et du droit. 3e Colloque franco-allemand des anthropologues du droit. Sankt Augustin, 20.–25. November 1992. Köln: Köppe, 69–90.Google Scholar
Trotha, T.v. 1995. ‘Gewalt, Staat und Basislegitimität. Notizen zum Problem der Macht in Afrika (und anderswo)’, in Willer, H., Förster, T. & Ortner-Buchberger, C., eds. Macht der Identität – Identität der Macht. Politische Prozesse und kultureller Wandel in Afrika. Münster: LIT, 1–16.Google Scholar
Trotha, T.v. 1996. ‘From administrative to civil chieftaincy. Some problems and prospects of African chieftaincy’, Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 28, 37–38: 79–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, H.G. & Kloeck-Jenson, S.. 1999. ‘Betwixt and between: “traditional authority” and democratic decentralization in post-war Mozambique’, African Affairs 98, 393: 455–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, H. 2012. ‘A post-Fordist ethnicity: insecurity, authority, and identity in South Africa’, Anthropological Quarterly 85, 2: 397–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, M.J. 2004. ‘Leading from behind: democratic consolidation and the chieftaincy in South Africa’, Journal of Modern African Studies 42, 1: 113–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, M.J. 2009. ‘Legislating “tradition” in South Africa’, Journal of Southern African Studies 35, 1: 191–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, M.J. 2010. Chieftaincy, the State, and Democracy: political legitimacy in post-apartheid South Africa. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Zuma, J.G. 2007. ‘Speech by Mr J.G. Zuma, Former Deputy President of the Republic of South Africa’, in International conference on traditional leadership 2007, Durban: Republic of South Africa and Department of Local Government and Traditional Affairs (KwaZulu-Natal Provincial Government), 100–3.Google Scholar

Unpublished sources

Beall, J., Mkhize, S. & Vawda, S.. 2003. ‘Traditions, inventions and transitions: framing institutional change in Metropolitan Governance in eThekwini (Greater Durban)’, ms.Google Scholar
Kelly, J.E. 2012. ‘Only the Fourth Chief’: conflict, land, and chiefly authority in 20th century KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa', unpublished dissertation.Google Scholar

News media

Buthelezi, M. 2014. ‘State at odds with the rights of rural people’, Mail & Guardian 28.2.2014, <http://mg.co.za/article/2014-02-27-state-at-odds-with-the-rights-of-rural-people/>, accessed 1.3.2014.,+accessed+1.3.2014.>Google Scholar
Claassens, A. 2013. ‘1913 Land Act: Bantustans left untransformed’, Mail & Guardian 14.6.2013, <http://mg.co.za/article/2013-06-14-00-1913-land-act-bantustans-left-untransformed>, accessed 15.2.2014.,+accessed+15.2.2014.>Google Scholar
Maphumulo, S. 2007. ‘Chiefs told to work closely with councillors’, eZasegagasini Metro Gazette 19.10.2007, <http://www.durban.gov.za/Documents/City_Government/Media_Publications/Ezasegagasini_Metro_Gazette/2007/19%20October%202007%20Ezasegagasini%20Page%202.pdf>, accessed 20.3.2014.,+accessed+20.3.2014.>Google Scholar
Mkhwanazi, S. 2008. ‘ANC to rule until Jesus comes back’, Independent Online News 5.5.2008, <http://www.iol.co.za/news/politics/anc-to-rule-until-jesus-comes-back-1.398843#.VdsKQc5ptdg>, accessed 30.6.2013.,+accessed+30.6.2013.>Google Scholar
SAPA. 2012. ‘All South Africans are equal’ – Zuma democracy comment ‘misconstrued’, Mail & Guardian 16.9.2012, <http://mg.co.za/article/2012-09-16-all-south-africans-are-equal-zuma-democracy-comment-misconstrued>, accessed 17.9.2012.,+accessed+17.9.2012.>Google Scholar
Sunday Tribune. 27.1.2008. ‘Buthelezi shrugs off Zuma threat’.Google Scholar
The Mercury. 24.12.2007. ‘I will not be aloof, Zuma promises supporters’.Google Scholar
The Mercury. 21.1.2008. ‘IFP likely to remodel itself’.Google Scholar
van der Westhuizen, C. 2013. ‘You have no right to own land if you're black and rural’, Mail & Guardian Thought Leader 9.4.2013, <http://www.thoughtleader.co.za/christivanderwesthuizen/2013/04/09/you-have-no-right-to-own-land-if-youre-black-and-rural/>, accessed 16.2.2014., accessed 16.2.2014.' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=van+der+Westhuizen,+C.2013.+‘You+have+no+right+to+own+land+if+you're+black+and+rural’,+Mail+&+Guardian+Thought+Leader+9.4.2013,+,+accessed+16.2.2014.>Google Scholar
Zvomuya, P. 2013. ‘Achebe's legacy, our lodestone’, Mail & Guardian 9.6.2013, <http://mg.co.za/article/2013-09-06-achebes-legacy-our-lodestone-1>, accessed 23.1.2014., accessed 23.1.2014.' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Zvomuya,+P.2013.+‘Achebe's+legacy,+our+lodestone’,+Mail+&+Guardian+9.6.2013,+,+accessed+23.1.2014.>Google Scholar

Interviews

IM, induna, KwaXimba, 17.3.2009.Google Scholar
NS, local ANC politician, KwaXimba, 26.2.2008.Google Scholar
VM, amakhosi office manager, Pinetown, 15.1.2008.Google Scholar