Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T10:28:45.839Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Empirical Tests of Dependency Theory: a Second Critique of Methodology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2008

Lizz Lyle Kleemeier
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of California, Berkeley.

Extract

Dependency theory has sometimes been called a perspective, rather than a theory, due to the multiplicity of often contrasting arguments attributed to it. Nevertheless, the theses of such well-known authors as Samir Amin and Cohn Leys have gained general recognition as representative of the theory. Both attempt to explain the general causes of underdevelopment, notably those factors underlying the poor sectoral articulation, skewed demand profile, and uneven economic growth of many Third-World countries. They argue that their long-run development is stifled by certain domestic class formations and relationships with international capital, thereby producing dependent economic structures.

Type
Africana
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)