Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message

Login Alert

Cancel
Log in
×
×
Register
Log In
(0) Cart
Logo for Cambridge Core from Cambridge University Press. Click to return to homepage.
Logo for Cambridge Core from Cambridge University Press. Click to return to homepage.
Cited by
  • Crossref logo 26
  • Google Scholar logo
Crossref Citations
Crossref logo
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Kabwegyere, Tarsis B. 1972. The Dynamics of Colonial violence : The Inductive System in Uganda. Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 9, Issue. 4, p. 303.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Henley, John S. 1973. Employment Relationships and Economic Development — the Kenyan Experience. The Journal of Modern African Studies, Vol. 11, Issue. 4, p. 559.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Lonsdale, John and Berman, Bruce 1979. Coping with the Contradictions: The Development of the Colonial State in Kenya, 1895–1914. The Journal of African History, Vol. 20, Issue. 4, p. 487.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Vine, Victor T. Le 1980. African Patrimonial Régimes in Comparative Perspective. The Journal of Modern African Studies, Vol. 18, Issue. 4, p. 657.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Brownsberger, William N. 1983. Development and Governmental Corruption – Materialism and Political Fragmentation in Nigeria. The Journal of Modern African Studies, Vol. 21, Issue. 2, p. 215.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Bates, Robert H. 1984. Some Conventional Orthodoxies in the Study of Agrarian Change. World Politics, Vol. 36, Issue. 2, p. 234.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Wipper, Audrey 1989. Kikuyu women and the Harry Thuku disturbances: some uniformities of female militancy. Africa, Vol. 59, Issue. 3, p. 300.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Berman, Bruce J. and Lonsdale, John M. 1991. Louis Leakey's Mau Mau: A study in the politics of knowledge. History and Anthropology, Vol. 5, Issue. 2, p. 143.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Klopp, Jacqueline M. and Orina, Janai R. 2002. University Crisis, Student Activism, and the Contemporary Struggle for Democracy in Kenya. African Studies Review, Vol. 45, Issue. 1, p. 43.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
BRANCH, DANIEL 2007. THE ENEMY WITHIN: LOYALISTS AND THE WAR AGAINST MAU MAU IN KENYA. The Journal of African History, Vol. 48, Issue. 2, p. 291.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Robertson, Claire C. 2007. Whose crime? Arson, class warfare and traders in Nairobi, 1940-20001. Crime, Histoire & Sociétés, Vol. 11, Issue. 2, p. 25.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Osborne, Myles 2014. Controlling Development: ‘Martial Race’ and Empire in Kenya, 1945–59. The Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, Vol. 42, Issue. 3, p. 464.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Brown, Carolyn A. 2015. Locals and Migrants in the Coalmining Town of Enugu (Nigeria): Worker Protest and Urban Identity, 1915–1929. International Review of Social History, Vol. 60, Issue. S1, p. 63.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Appeltshauser, Laura 2016. Globalizing International Relations. p. 239.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Ikeotuonye, Maureen 2016. ‘Mary Amaka’ Feminism: Exploring the underside of pop-cultured ‘global women empowerment’. Current Sociology, Vol. 64, Issue. 2, p. 293.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Picci, Lucio 2017. The Supply-Side of International Corruption: A New Measure and a Critique. SSRN Electronic Journal,
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Picci, Lucio 2018. The Supply-Side of International Corruption: a New Measure and a Critique. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, Vol. 24, Issue. 3, p. 289.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Antonio, Wycliffe and Griffith-Charles, Charisse 2019. Achieving land development benefits on customary/communal land. Land Use Policy, Vol. 83, Issue. , p. 124.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Kramon, Eric 2019. Ethnic group institutions and electoral clientelism. Party Politics, Vol. 25, Issue. 3, p. 435.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Bacon, J. M. and Norton, Matthew 2019. Colonial America Today: U.S. Empire and the Political Status of Native American Nations. Comparative Studies in Society and History, Vol. 61, Issue. 2, p. 301.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Download full list
Google Scholar Citations

View all Google Scholar citations for this article.

×
Cambridge University Press

Our Site

  • Accessibility
  • Contact & Help
  • Legal Notices

Our Platforms

  • Cambridge Core
  • Cambridge Open Engage
  • Cambridge Higher Education

Our Products

  • Journals
  • Books
  • Elements
  • Textbooks
  • Courseware

Join us online

Please choose a valid location.

  • Rights & Permissions
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Notice
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies Policy
Cambridge University Press 2025

Cancel
Confirm
×

Save article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Colonial Chiefs in Chiefless Societies
  • Volume 9, Issue 3
  • Robert L. Tignor
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022278X00025131
Please provide your Kindle email.
Available formats Please select a format to save.
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Colonial Chiefs in Chiefless Societies
  • Volume 9, Issue 3
  • Robert L. Tignor
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022278X00025131
Available formats Please select a format to save.
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Colonial Chiefs in Chiefless Societies
  • Volume 9, Issue 3
  • Robert L. Tignor
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022278X00025131
Available formats Please select a format to save.
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Contents help
Close Contents help

- No HTML tags allowed
- Web page URLs will display as text only
- Lines and paragraphs break automatically
- Attachments, images or tables are not permitted

Please enter your response.

Your details

Email help
Close Email help

Your email address will be used in order to notify you when your comment has been reviewed by the moderator and in case the author(s) of the article or the moderator need to contact you directly.

Please enter a valid email address.
You have entered the maximum number of contributors

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? * Conflicting interests help

Close Conflicting interests help

Please list any fees and grants from, employment by, consultancy for, shared ownership in or any close relationship with, at any time over the preceding 36 months, any organisation whose interests may be affected by the publication of the response. Please also list any non-financial associations or interests (personal, professional, political, institutional, religious or other) that a reasonable reader would want to know about in relation to the submitted work. This pertains to all the authors of the piece, their spouses or partners.