Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T22:30:23.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The African Private Sector and U.S. Policy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2008

Robert L. Curry Jr
Affiliation:
Professor of Economics, California State University, Sacramento

Extract

The Reagan Administration's approach to the economic development of the continent stems from a virtually unquestioned reliance on the African private sector, bolstered by multinational capital. This strategy has been outlined in the Department of State's Current Policy Memorandum, No. 348, based on an address made by Chester A. Crocker, Assistant Secretary for African Affairs, to the United States Council on Foreign Relations on 19 November 1981, when he reminded his audience that the President had stressed the following two points at the Cancun Summit the previous month: freedom to choose, to own property, to work at a job of one's choice, and to invest in a dream for the future is an ingredient vital to economic success;…and individual farmers, laborers, owners, traders and managers are the heart and soul of development.

Type
Africana
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 503 note 1 Crocker, Chester A., ‘The African Private Sector and U.S. Policy’, Current Policy Memorandum, No. 348 (Department of State, Washington, D.C.), 19 11 1981, p. 1.Google Scholar

page 503 note 2 Ibid.

page 503 note 3 Ibid. pp. 1 and 5.

page 503 note 4 Ibid. p. 6.

page 504 note 1 Cf. Rothchild, Donald and Curry, Robert L. Jr, Scarcity, Choice and Public Policy in Middle Africa (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1978), p. 206.Google Scholar

page 504 note 2 Crocker, loc. cit. p. 3.

page 505 note 1 For the report of the 1980 Botswana conference, see Commonwealth Secretariat, Performance Evaluation of Public Enterprises (London, 1981), pp. 3–4.Google Scholar

page 506 note 1 See, for example, Gillis, Malcolm and Peprah, Ignatius, ‘State-Owned Enterprises in Developing Countries’, in The Wharton Magazine (Philadelphia), Winter 19811982, pp. 3240.Google Scholar

page 506 note 2 Ibid. pp. 7–10; see also Curry, Robert L. Jr, Allocating Economic Activities Among the Private, Parastatal and Public Sectors in Lesotho (Maseru, Institute for Development Management, 1980), pp. 1023.Google Scholar

page 506 note 3 Clearly, administrative and managerial inadequacies ought not to be excused in the name of serving the poor, a lesson learned by Zambian and other African decision-makers during the past decade. See Mwanza, Jacob, ‘Parastatal Enterprises in Zambia’, in Performance Evaluation of Public Enterprises, ch. 2.Google Scholar

page 507 note 1 Willoughby, Christopher R., ‘Infrastructure: Doing More with Less’, in Finance and Development (Washington, D.C.), 18, 4, 12 1981, p. 30.Google Scholar

page 508 note 1 Ibid. p. 33.

page 508 note 2 International Labour Office, Employment and Basic Needs (Geneva, 1976), p. 61.Google Scholar

page 508 note 3 Crosswell, Michael, ‘Basic Human Needs’, A.I.D. Discussion Paper No. 38 (Washington, D.C., 1978), p. 15.Google Scholar

page 509 note 1 Ibid. pp. 16–18.

page 509 note 2 Crocker, op. cit. pp. 3–4.

page 510 note 1 U.S. Congress. House Sub-Committee on International Security and Scientific Affairs. ‘Statement of Hon. Lucy W. Benson, Under-Secretary, Department of State’, Hearings on Overview of Security Supporting Assistance Programs (Washington, D.C., 03 and 04 1978), p. 1.Google Scholar

page 510 note 2 Ibid. p. 2.

page 510 note 3 Agency for International Development, ‘AID Policy on Security Supporting Assistance’, Washington, D.C., 1978, mimeographed, pp. 1–4.

page 510 note 4 U.S. Congress. Joint Senate Committee on Foreign Relations and House International Relations Committee. Legislation on Foreign Relations through 1976 (Washington, D.C., 02 1977), pp. 45.Google Scholar

page 511 note 1 Ibid. p. 6.

page 511 note 2 Agency for International Development, Implementation of ‘New Directions’ in Development Assistanceo (Washington, D.C., 1975), pp. 122.Google Scholar

page 511 note 3 See Morgan, E. Philip, ‘U.S. Foreign Aid Cuts Reflect Policy Shift’, in Public Administration Times (New York), 4, 6, 15 08 1981, p. 3.Google Scholar