Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T15:32:54.239Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tales of accountability: a Q-method study of discourses amongst Tanzanian members of parliament*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 August 2017

Jesper Katomero ,
Robert Hoppe  and
Anna Wesselink
Jesper Katomero*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Behavioural Management and Social Sciences, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500AE Enschede, the Netherlands and Department of Political Science and Public Administration, P.O. Box 35042, University of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
Robert Hoppe*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Behavioural Management and Social Sciences, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500AE Enschede, the Netherlands
Anna Wesselink*
Affiliation:
IHE Delft Institute for Water Education, Westvest 7 Delft, 2611 AX, the Netherlands
*
Email: [email protected]
Email: [email protected]
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The hallmark of accountability in a democracy centres on the way the elected parliament holds the executive to account. If the parliament does not perform its oversight role effectively, lower authorities would have fewer incentives to do the same vis-à-vis local executives. In this article we therefore ask whether or not different meanings of accountability can be discerned amongst Tanzanian Members of Parliament (MPs). In our Q-method research we found four clearly identifiable discourses on accountability amongst Tanzanian MPs: Partycrats; My Electorate's Advocates; Frustrated Account Holders; and Pragmatic Account Holders. We understand MPs discourses within the broader context of political clientelism and we argue that this combination of discourses, or accountability culture, enables the executive to rule in semi-autocratic ways. Even if opposition parties would obtain a parliamentary majority, this accountability culture stands in the way of achieving greater democratic responsiveness.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Modern African Studies , Volume 55 , Issue 3 , September 2017 , pp. 423 - 453
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

We gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the research programme, Sensors, Empowerment and Accountability (SEMA) in Tanzania, funded by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research – Science for Global Development (NWO-Wotro).

References

REFERENCES

Andrew, M. 2013. Do International Organizations Really Shape Government Solutions In Developing Countries? CID Working Paper No. 264. Cambridge, MA: Center for International Development, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Bana, B. & McCourt, W.. 2006. ‘Institutions and governance: public staff management in Tanzania’, Public Administration and Development 26: 395–407.Google Scholar
Bayart, J.F. 2009. The State in Africa: the politics of the belly. Second Edition. Cambridge: Polity Press. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Bayart, J.F., Ellis, S. & Hibou, B.. 1999. The Criminalization of the State in Africa. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Booth, D. 2011. Governance for Development in Africa: building on what works. London: Overseas Development Institute.Google Scholar
Bovens, M. 2007. ‘Analysing and assessing accountability: a conceptual framework’, European Journal of Law 13, 4: 447–68.Google Scholar
Bratton, M. 2010. Citizens' Perceptions of Local Government Responsiveness in Sub-Saharan Africa. Cape Town: Afro Barometer.Google Scholar
Bratton, M. & Logan, C.. 2013. Voters But Not Yet Citizens: the weak demand for vertical accountability. Cape Town: Afro Barometer.Google Scholar
Brown, S.R. 1996. ‘Q methodology and qualitative research’, Health Research 6, 4: 561–7.Google Scholar
Carlitz, R. 2013. ‘Improving transparency and accountability in the budget process: an assessment of recent initiatives’, Development Policy Review 31, s1: S49–67.Google Scholar
Chayes, S. 2015. Thieves of State: why corruption threatens global security. New York, NY: W.W. Norton and Company Inc.Google Scholar
Chalmers, I. & Setiyono, B.. 2012. ‘The struggle against corruption during the democratic transition: theorizing the emergent role of CSOs’, Development and Society 41, 1: 77–102.Google Scholar
De Mesquita, B.B. & Smith, A.. 2012. The Dictator's Handbook: why bad behavior is almost always good politics. Philadelphia, PA: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
De Mesquita, B.B. & Smith, A.. 2015. ‘Tanzania's economic and political performance: a district-level test of selectorate theory’, in Wolf, S.O., Schöttli, J., Frommherz, D., Fürstenberg, K., Gallenkamp, M., König, L. & Pauli, M., eds. Politics in South Asia: culture, rationality and conceptual flow. Heidelberg: Springer, 31–48.Google Scholar
de Wit, J.W. & Akinyoade, A.. 2008. Accountability in Formal and Informal Institutions: a cross country analysis. ISS Working Paper Series/General Series, Volume 464. Erasmus University Rotterdam, 1–35. http://hdl.handle.net/1765/18729.Google Scholar
Esaiasson, P. & Narud, H.M.. 2013. Between-Election Democracy: the representative relationship after election day. Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
Grindle, M.S. 2010. Good Governance: The Inflation of an Idea. CID Working Paper No. 202. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Guillan-Montero, A. 2014. As If: The Fiction of Executive Accountability and The Persistence of Corruption Networks in Weakly Institutionalized Presidential Systems. Argentina (1989–2007). Georgetown: Georgetown University, PhD Dissertation.Google Scholar
Ha, E.H. 2015. ‘Attitudes toward clinical practice in undergraduate nursing students: a Q methodology study’, Nurse Education Today 35, 6: 733–9.Google Scholar
Heilman, B. & Ndumbaro, L.. 2002. ‘Corruption, politics, and societal values in Tanzania: an evaluation of the Mkapa administration's anti-corruption efforts’, African Journal of Political Science 7, 1: 1–20.Google Scholar
Helmke, G. & Levitsky, S.. 2004. ‘Informal institutions and comparative politics: a research agenda’, Politics 2, 4: 725–40.Google Scholar
Hoffman, B.D. 2006. Political Accountability at the Local Level in Tanzania. Unpublished Dissertation. University of California Santiago.Google Scholar
Hoppe, R. 2008. ‘Scientific advice and public policymaker's discourses on boundary work’, Poiesis & Praxis 6, 3: 235–63.Google Scholar
Hyden, G. 2010. Political Accountability in Africa: is the glass half-full or half-empty? London: Overseas Development Institute.Google Scholar
Hyden, G. 2013. African Politics in Comparative Perspective. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Innerarity, D. 2013. The Democracy of Knowledge. New York, NY: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Jeffares, S. & Skelcher, C.. 2011. ‘Democratic subjectivities in network governance: a Q methodology study of English and Dutch public managers’, Public Administration 89, 4: 1253–73.Google Scholar
Kelsall, T. 2003. ‘Rituals of verification: indigenous and imported accountability in Northern Tanzania’, Africa 73, 2: 174–201.Google Scholar
Kelsall, T. 2008. Going with the Grain in African Development. London: Overseas Development Institute.Google Scholar
Khan, M.H. & Gray, H.. 2006. State Weakness in Developing Countries and Strategies of Institutional Reform: operational implications for anti-corruption policy and a case study of Tanzania. London: London School of Economics and Political Science.Google Scholar
Killian, B. 2014. ‘A proposed structure of the union in Tanzania: political parties at a crossroad’, African Review 41, 1: 116–38.Google Scholar
Lawson, A. & Rakner, L.. 2005. Understanding Patterns of Accountability in Tanzania. Final Synthesis Report. Oxford: Oxford Policy Management.Google Scholar
Lindberg, S.I. 2010. ‘What accountability pressures do MPs in Africa face and how do they respond? Evidence from Ghana’, Journal of Modern African Studies 48, 1: 117–42.Google Scholar
Lindner, S. & Banoba, P.. 2014. Tanzania: overview of corruption and anti-corruption. U4 expert answer. Transparency International. http://www.transparency.org/files/content/corruptionqas/Country_profile_Tanzania_2014.pdf, accessed 24.9.2015.Google Scholar
Liviga, A. 2004. ‘The role of members of parliament as representatives of the people’, in Mukandala, R.S. et al. eds. People's Representatives: theory and practice of parliamentary democracy in Tanzania. Kampala: Fountain Publishers.Google Scholar
Mallya, E. 2011. ‘Accountability and transparency at grassroots level: the experience of Tanzania’, paper presented at ‘Democratic Transition in East Africa: governance and development at the grassroots’ Arusha, 17–18 November 2009. Dar es Salaam: Research and Education for Democracy in Tanzania.Google Scholar
Matenge, F.J. 2012. ‘Parliamentary supremacy in Tanzania: rhetoric and reality’, Journal of Education, Humanities and Sciences 1, 1: 38–56.Google Scholar
Melber, H. (ed.). 2007. Governance and State Delivery in Southern Africa: examples from Botswana, Namibia and Zimbabwe. Uppsala: Nordiska afrikainstitutet.Google Scholar
Mhina, A. 2004. ‘The Political Competences of Voters and their Members of Parliament’, in Mukandala, R.S. et al. eds. People's Representatives: theory and practice of parliamentary democracy in Tanzania. Kampala: Fountain Publishers.Google Scholar
Mo Ibrahim Foundation. 2014. Ibrahim Index of African Governance, 2014: Summary Report. http://static.moibrahimfoundation.org/downloads/publications/2014/2014-iiag-summary-report.pdf, accessed 24.9.2015.Google Scholar
Morck, A.B. 2005. The United Republic of Tanzania: Presidential and Parliamentary Elections December 2005. Report 4/2006. Oslo: Norwegian Centre for Human Rights.Google Scholar
Mwakyembe, H.G. 1986. ‘The parliament and the electoral process’, in Shivji, I.G., ed. The State and the Working People in Tanzania. Dakar: CODESRIA.Google Scholar
Norris, P., Frank, R.W. & Martinez i Coma, F. (eds). 2014. Advancing Electoral Integrity. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Presidential Power. 2015. Tanzania – As corruption spreads under President Kikwete, Parliament quietly gains strength. http://presidential-power.com/?p=2759, accessed 15.9.2015.Google Scholar
Reith, S. 2011. Tanzania after The parliamentary and presidential elections 2010: dawn of a multi-party democratic era? KAS International Reports. http://www.kas.de/wf/doc/kas_21554-1522-2-30.pdf?110112143740, accessed 28.9.2015.Google Scholar
Rottenburg, R. 2002. Far Fetched Facts: a parable of aid development. Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius.Google Scholar
Schatz, F. 2013. ‘Fighting corruption with social accountability: a comparative analysis of social accountability mechanism's potential to reduce corruption in public administration’, Public Administration and Development 33, 3: 161–74.Google Scholar
Schmolck, P. 2014. PQMethod Manual. http://schmolck.userweb.mwn.de/qmethod/pqmanual.htm, accessed 2.9.2015.Google Scholar
Shivji, I.G. & Majamba, H.I.. 2004. Constitutional and Legal System of Tanzania: a civics sourcebook. Dar es Salaam: Mkuki na Nyota Publishers.Google Scholar
Stephenson, W. 1954. The Study of Behavior: Q-technique and its methodology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Tambila, K.I. 2004. ‘The ups and downs of the Tanzanian parliament 1961–1994’, in Mukandala, R.S., Mushi, S.S. & Rubagumya, C., eds. Peoples Representatives: theory and practice of parliamentary democracy in Tanzania. Kampala: Fountain Publishers.Google Scholar
Tanzania National Electoral Commission (NEC). 2015. Announcement of Presidential and Parliamentary Election Results http://www.nec.go.tz/uploads/files/Majina%20viti%20Maalum.pdf, accessed 15.11.2015.Google Scholar
Therkildsen, O. 2000. ‘Public sector reform in a poor, aid-dependent country, Tanzania’, Public Administration and Development 20, 1: 61–71.Google Scholar
Thoden van Velzen, H.U.E. & Sterkenburg, J.J.. 1969. ‘The Party Supreme’, Kroniek van Africa 1, 65–88. Reprinted in Cliffe & Saul (eds) 1972, 257–64.Google Scholar
Tilley, H. 2014. The Political Economy of Aid and Accountability: the rise and fall of budget support in Tanzania. Burlington: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Tordoff, W. 1993. Government and Politics in Africa. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Transparency International. 2014. Corruption Perceptions Index. http://www.transparency.org/policy_research/surveys_indices/cpi, accessed 24.9.2015.Google Scholar
Van de Walle, N. 2009. ‘The democratization of political clientelism in sub-Saharan Africa’, paper presented at the 3rd European Conference on African Studies, Leipzig, Germany, 4–7 June.Google Scholar
Van Donge, J.K. & Liviga, J.A.. 1985. ‘The 1982 Elections for Membership of the National Executive Committee of Chama cha Mapinduzi’, Journal of Commonwealth and Comparative Politics 23, 1: 43–66.Google Scholar
Van Donge, J.K. & Liviga, J.A.. 1986. ‘Tanzanian political culture and the cabinet’, Journal of Modern African Studies 24, 4: 619–39.Google Scholar
Venugopal, V. & Yilmaz, S.. 2010. ‘Decentralization in Tanzania: an assessment of local government discretion and accountability’, Public Administration and Development 30, 3: 215–31.Google Scholar
Watts, S. & Stenner, P.. 2012. Doing Q Methodological Research: theory, method & interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar