Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T04:14:46.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Military Intervention and the Myth of Collective Security: the Case of Zaïre

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2008

Michael G. Schatzberg
Michael G. Schatzberg
Affiliation:
Associate Professor of Comparative Politics and African Studies, The Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies, The Johns Hopkins University, Washington, D.C.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Zaïre has been open to external penetration from its earliest days as the Congo Independent State of King Léopold II, but unlike most other weak and vulnerable African states it has experienced repeated military interventions. When President Mobutu Sese Seko addressed the U.N. General Assembly in October 1973 he formally thanked the world organisation for preserving his country during the early 1960s:

If a small minority of member countries of this organisation had refused to participate in the Congo operation, at the time, the vast majority had, however, spontaneously put troops at its disposition or intervened in favour of this operation. This permitted the maintenance of peace, unity, and the integrity of the national territory.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Modern African Studies , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , June 1989 , pp. 315 - 340
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Seko, Mobutu Sese, ‘Discours du chef de l'état, Mobutu Sese Seko Kuku Ngbendu wa za Banga à la tribune des Nations Unies à New York’, in Cultures au Zaïre et en Afrique (Kinshasa), 2, 1973, p. 236.Google Scholar

1 Claude, Inis L. Jr, Power and International Relations (New York, 1962), pp. 94 and 110,Google Scholar and Thompson, Kenneth W., ‘Collective Security’, in Sills, David L. (ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences (New York, 1968), Vol. II, p. 565.Google Scholar

1 Claude, op. cit. p. 196; Thompson, loc. cit. p. 565; Hanrieder, Wolfram F., ‘International Organizations and International Systems’, in Falk, Richard A. and Hanrieder, (eds.), International Law and Organization: an introductory reader (Philadelphia, 1968), p. 279;Google Scholar and Wolfers, Arnold, Discord and Collaboration: essays on international politics (Baltimore, 1962), pp. 170 and 183–4.Google Scholar

2 Wolfers, op. cit. p. 168.

3 Claude, op. cit. p. 113.

4 Haas, Ernst B., ‘Types of Collective Security: an examination of operational concepts’, in The American Political Science Review (Washington, D.C.), 49, 1, 03 1955, p. 40.Google Scholar

5 Carr, E. H., The Twenty Years' Crisis: an introduction to the study of international relations (London, 1962), p. 87.Google Scholar

1 Hanrieder, loc. cit. p. 280, and Pick, Otto and Critchley, Julian, Collective Security (London, 1974). pp. 28–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 Buzan, Barry, People, States, and Fear: the national security problem in international relations (Chapel Hill, 1983), p. 69.Google Scholar

2 Luckham, Robin, ‘Security and Disarmamaent in Africa’, in Alternatives: a journal of world policy (New Brunswick), 9, 2, Fall 1983, p. 205.Google Scholar

1 Young, Crawford, Politics in the Congo: decolonization and independence (Princeton, 1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 Others have already discussed the precise interpretations of the relevant U.N. resolutions and the actions of the U.N. forces. See, for example, Abi-Saab, Georges, The United Motions Operations in the Congo, 1960–1964 (Oxford, 1978),Google Scholar and Higgins, Rosalyn, United Nations Peacekeeping, 1946–1967: documents and commentary, Vol. III, Africa (Oxford, 1980).Google Scholar

1 Young, op. cit.; Hoskyns, Catherine, The Congo Since Independence: January 1960–December 1961 (Oxford, 1965);Google Scholar and Willame, Jean-Claude, Patrimonialism and Political Change in the Congo (Stanford, 1972).Google Scholar

2 Gérard-Libois, Jules, Katanga Secession (Madison, 1966).Google Scholar

3 Kalb, Madeleine G., The Congo Cables: the cold war in Africa from Eisenhower to Kennedy (New York, 1982).Google Scholar

1 Ibid. p. 57.

2 Kanza, Thomas, Conflict in the Congo: the rise and fall of Lumumba (Harmondsworth, 1972), p. 221.Google Scholar

1 Weissman, Stephen R., American Foreign Policy in the Congo, 1960–1964 (Ithaca and London, 1974).Google Scholar

2 Pachter, Elise Forbes, ‘Our Man in Kinshasa: U.S. relations with Mobutu, 1970–1983; patron-client relations in the international sphere’, Ph.D. dissertation, School of Advanced International Studies, The Johns Hopkins University, Washington, D.C., 1987, p. 87.Google Scholar

3 O'Brien, Conor Cruise, ‘Conflicting Concepts of the United Nations’, in Falk, and Hanrieder, (eds.), op. cit. pp. 197–8.Google Scholar

4 Ibid. p. 200.

5 Nzongola-Ntalaja, , ‘United States Policy toward Zaire’, in Bender, Gerald J., Coleman, James S., and Sklar, Richard L. (eds.), African Crisis Areas and U.S. Foreign Policy (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1985), pp. 226–7.Google Scholar

1 Crawford Young, ‘The Zairian Crisis and American Foreign Policy’, in Ibid. pp. 211–12.

2 Stephen, R. Weissman, ‘CIA Covert Action in Zaire and Angola: patterns and consequences’, in Political Science Quarterly (New York), 94, 2, Summer 1979, p. 269.Google Scholar

3 Minter, William, ‘The Limits of Liberal Africa Policy: lessons from the Congo crisis’, in Trans Africa Forum (Washington, D.C.), 2, 3, Fall 1984, p. 29.Google Scholar Also see U.S. Congress, Senate, Select [Church] Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities, Alleged Assassination Plots Involving Foreign Leaders (Washington, D.C., 1975).Google Scholar For critical views of the U.S. rôle, see Weissman, ‘CIA Covert Action’, and Kalb, op. cit.

4 Hoskyns, op. cit. pp. 472–3.

1 Fox, Renée, de Craemer, Willy, and Ribeaucourt, Jean-Marie, ‘“The Second Independence”: a case study of the Kwilu rebellion in the Congo”, in Comparative Studies in Society and History (Cambridge), 8, 1, 10 1965, pp. 78–109;Google Scholar and Verhaegen, Benoît, Rébellions au Congo, Vols. I and II (Brussels and Kinshasa, 1966 and 1969).Google Scholar

2 Nzongola-Ntalaja, loc. cit. pp. 231–2.

1 Borel, Philippe, ‘La Commission “ad hoc” de l'OUA et l'enjeu congolais durant la période des insurrections (1964–1965)’, in Les Cahiers du CEDAF (Brussels), 7–8, 12 1986, p. 176.Google Scholar

2 Andemicael, Berhanykun, The OAUand the UN: relations between the Organization of African Unity and the United Nations (New York and London, 1976), p. 67;Google Scholar and Gérard-Libois, Jules and van Lierde, Jean, Congo 1964 (Brussels and Léopoldville, 1965), pp. 453–63.Google Scholar

1 Congo 1964, pp. 464–74; Andemicael, op. cit. pp. 66–8; and Zacher, Mark W., International Conflicts and Collective Security, 1946–77: the United Nations, Organization of American States, Organization of African Unity, and Arab League (New York, 1979), pp. 152–3.Google Scholar

1 Congo 1964, pp. 474–83.

2 According to Pachter, op. cit. p. 90, four of the five U.S. officials were C.I.A. staff.

3 Weissman, American Foreign Policy, pp. 236–7, and Borel, loc. cit. pp. 182–3. There may also have been a question of duplicity. According to Attwood, William, The Reds and the Blacks: a personal adventure (New York and London, 1967), pp. 214–15Google Scholar, he was told when U.S. ambassador in Nairobi by the representative of the rebels, Thomas Kanza, that before the fate of the hostages could be discussed, the columns would have to halt, a condition the U.S. Government found unacceptable. In private, Attwood warned Kenyatta that ‘the paratroopers might have to mount a humanitarian rescue operation as a last resort’, and later, on the day of the drop, related that ‘ I could see the anger in Kenyatta's eyes. I knew that he felt I'd deceived him and that we'd pulled a Pearl Harbor on the OAU’.

4 Wagoner, Fred E., Dragon Rouge: the rescue of hostages in the Congo (Washington, D.C., 1980), pp. 132 and 166–8,Google Scholar and Weissman, American Foreign Policy, pp. 251–2.

1 Hoskyns, Catherine, Case Studies in African Diplomacy: I. The Organisation of African Unity and the Congo Crisis, 1964–65 (Dar es Salaam, Oxford University Press for the Institute of Public Administration, 1969), p. 58.Google Scholar

2 Congo 1964, pp. 499–503.

3 Borel, loc. cit. pp. 184–5, and Zacher, op. cit. p. 153.

1 On the Second Republic, see Young, Crawford and Turner, Thomas, The Rise and Decline of the Zaïrian State (Madison, 1985);Google ScholarCallaghy, Thomas M., The State-Society Struggle: Zaire in comparative perspective (New York, 1984);Google Scholar and Schatzberg, Michael G., The Dialectics of Oppression in Zaire (Bloomington, 1988).Google Scholar

2 Nzongola–Ntalaja, loc. cit. p. 235.

1 Young and Turner, op. cit. pp. 255–7, and Willame, Jean-Claude, ‘La Seconde guerre du Shaba’, in Genève-Afrique, 16, 1, 1977–1978, pp. 10–11Google Scholar

1 Pachter, op. cit. pp. 253–70, and Wiseman, Henry, ‘The OAU: peacekeeping and conflict resolution’, in Yassin, El-Ayouty and Zartman, I. William (eds.), The OAU after Twenty Years (New York, 1984), pp. 141–2.Google Scholar

2 Elima (Kinshasa), 11 and 12 03 1977.Google Scholar

3 Pachter, op. cit.

4 Salongo (Kinshasa), 7 07 1977.Google Scholar

5 Willame, ‘La Seconde guerre du Shaba’, pp. 11 and 14. See also Pachter, op. cit. pp. 256–80, and Smith, Wayne S., The Closest of Enemies: a personal and diplomatic account of U.S.–Cuban relations since 1957 (New York, 1987), pp. 121, 137–8, and 141.Google Scholar

6 Mangold, Peter, ‘Shaba I and Shaba II’, in Survival (London), 21, 3, 05–06 1979, p. 110.Google Scholar

1 U.S. Foreign Broadcast Information Service, North Africa, 20 April 1977, p. 9.

2 Hughes, Anthony J., ‘Interview: Umba di Lutete, Zairean Ambassador to the United Nations’, in Africa Report (New Brunswick), 22, 4, 07–08 1977, p. 12.Google Scholar

1 Willame, ‘La Seconde guerre du Shaba’, p. 18, and Zartman, I. William, Ripe for Resolution: conflict and intervention in Africa (New York and Oxford, 1985), pp. 136–7.Google Scholar Zartman's otherwise excellent account of the two Shabas is marred by his incorrect statement, p. 137, that ‘The Europeans were killed by the invaders and in the subsequent efforts to repel the invasion’. Some were caught in cross-fire, but the Zaïrian army's direct rôle in the massacre seems beyond question.

2 Pachter, op. cit. and Mangold, loc. cit.

3 Salongo, 16 May 1978.

1 Ibid. 9 June 1978.

2 Červenka, Zdenek and Legum, Colin, ‘The Organization of African Unity in 1978: the challenge of foreign intervention’, in Legum, (ed.), Africa Contemporary Record, 1978–79 (New York and London, 1989), pp. A30–3.Google Scholar

3 Zartman, Ripe for Resolution, p. 145.

1 Červenka and Legum, loc. cit. p. A35.

1 Jackson, Robert H. and Rosberg, Carl G., Personal Rule in Black Africa: prince, autocrat, prophet, tyrant (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1982).Google Scholar

2 Callaghy, op. cit.

3 Salongo, 14–15 November 1981.

4 Elima, 27 June 1983.

1 Lemarchand, René, ‘The Crisis in Chad’, in Bender, , Coleman, , and Sklar, (eds.), op. cit. p. 249.Google Scholar

2 West Africa (London), 21 09 1987, p. 1871.Google Scholar

1 Schatzberg, op. cit.

2 Elima, 11 March 1977.

3 Zartman, I. William, ‘Africa as a Subordinate State System in International Relations’, in International Organization (Cambridge, Mass.), 21, 3, Summer 1967, pp. 545–64.Google Scholar Although some of these norms have come under attack over the last two decades, Zartman feels they retain their validity. But S. N. MacFarlane perceives their erosion, questions their continued applicability, and disputes the point. See Zartman, I. William, ‘The OAU in the African State System: interaction and evaluation’, in El-Ayouty, and Zartman, (eds.), op. cit. p. 29,Google Scholar and MacFarlane, S. N., ‘Intervention and Security in Africa’, in International Affairs (London), 60, 1, Winter 1983–1984, p. 64.Google Scholar

1 For an excellent discussion of the various meanings of security in Africa, see Luckham, loc. cit. pp. 203–28.