Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T20:50:15.690Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Formalising land rights based on customary tenure: community delimitation and women's access to land in central Mozambique*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2015

Randi Kaarhus  and
Stefaan Dondeyne
Randi Kaarhus*
Affiliation:
Centre for Practical Knowledge, University of Nordland, Bodø, Norway
Stefaan Dondeyne*
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200E, B3001 Leuven, Belgium
*
Email: [email protected]
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Mozambican Land Law of 1997 intends to provide flexible rules of access to land, while securing local people's customary rights, as well as equal rights for women and men. Drawing on participant observation during a ‘land delimitation’ process in central Mozambique, this article analyses the complex negotiation ensuing from the implementation of the Land Law in a local community. It shows how the delimitation process provided spaces for asserting – male – roles of power and authority, while local women were increasingly marginalised in the process. By presenting oral testimonies from women in the community, the authors seek to balance the account, providing women's perspectives on the highly gendered character of interests in, access to, and exclusion from land. The analysis ends with the question: What would be required to provide a space for local women to articulate their interests in a secure access to land during the delimitation process itself?

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Modern African Studies , Volume 53 , Issue 2 , June 2015 , pp. 193 - 216
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

A research grant from the Research Council of Norway (NFR) through the programme ‘Poverty and Peace’ provided funding for part of the fieldwork carried out in Mozambique. The authors would like to thank two anonymous reviewers for valuable comments on an earlier version of this article. Furthermore, we must express our gratitude to Milagre Nuvunga, James Bannerman, Sr Malunguisse, Sr Selcio, Sr Lidio and Sr Washington for their support and cooperation, and acknowledge the value of experiences shared by local staff at the ORAM, iTC, MICAIA, Pambere and Kwaedza Simukai offices in Manica province. In particular, Benilde Nhabomba, Tina Krüger and Zacarias Jemusa Gumbo are thanked for their assistance in interviewing 21 women in the community. Special thanks to James Bannerman for commenting on and revising the final text.

References

REFERENCES

Alden Wily, L. 2000. ‘Land tenure reform and the balance of power in eastern and southern Africa’, ODI Natural Resources Perspectives 58: 1–4.Google Scholar
Anseeuw, W. & Alden, C., eds. 2010. The Struggle over Land in Africa: conflicts, politics and change. Pretoria: HSRC Press.Google Scholar
Arce, A. & Long, N.. 1993. ‘Bridging two worlds: an ethnography of bureaucrat-peasant relations in western Mexico’, in Hobart, M., ed. An Anthropological Critique of Development: the growth of ignorance. London: Routledge, 179–208.Google Scholar
Banda, F. 2006. ‘Women, law and human rights in Southern Africa’, Journal of Southern African Studies 32, 1: 13–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BorrasJr, S. M. Jr, S. M., Fig, D. & Suárez, S. M.. 2011. ‘The politics of agrofuels and mega-land and water deals: insights from the ProCana case, Mozambique’, Review of African Political Economy 38, 128: 215–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chanock, M. 1985. Law, Custom and Social Order: the colonial experience in Malawi and Zambia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Claassens, A. 2013. ‘Recent changes in women's land rights and contested customary law in South Africa’, Journal of Agrarian Change 13, 1: 71–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claassens, A. & Ngubane, S.. 2008. ‘Women, land and power: the impact of the communal land rights act’, in Claassens, A. & Cousins, B., eds. Land, Power and Custom: controversies generated by South Africa's communal land rights act. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press, 154–83.Google Scholar
Cleaver, F. 2012. Development through Bricolage: rethinking institutions for natural resource management. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cooper, E. 2011. ‘Challenges and opportunities in inheritance rights in Mozambique’. Chronic Poverty Research Centre Inheritance Series Policy Note. <http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1775793>, accessed 26.12.2013.,+accessed+26.12.2013.>Google Scholar
Cotula, L., Vermeulen, S., Leonard, R. & Keeley, J.. 2009. Land Grab or Development Opportunity? Agricultural investment and international land deals in Africa. London/Rome: IIED/FAO/IFAD.Google Scholar
Cousins, B. 2008. ‘Contextualising the controversies: dilemmas of communal tenure reform in post-apartheid South Africa’, in Claassens, A. & Cousins, B., eds. Land, Power and Custom: controversies generated by South Africa's communal land rights act. Athens OH: Ohio University Press, 3–31.Google Scholar
Deininger, K. 2003. Land Policies for Growth and Poverty Reduction. Washington, DC: World Bank & Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Derman, W. & Kaarhus, R., eds. 2013. In the Shadow of a Conflict: crisis in Zimbabwe and its effects in Mozambique, South Africa and Zambia. Harare: Weaver Press.Google Scholar
DfID 2008. ‘Mozambique: the best land law in Africa? Case study 1’. Maputo: Department for International Development. <http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/>, accessed 31.5.2010.,+accessed+31.5.2010.>Google Scholar
Dondeyne, S., Vanthournout, E., Wembah-Rashid, J.A.R. & Deckers, J.A.. 2003. ‘Changing land tenure regimes in a matrilineal village of South Eastern Tanzania’, Journal of Social Development in Africa 18, 1: 7–32.Google Scholar
Dondeyne, S., Kaarhus, R. & Allison, G.. (2012). ‘Nature conservation, rural development and ecotourism in central Mozambique: which space do local communities get?’, in Convery, I., Corsane, G. & Davis, P., eds. Making Sense of Place: multidisciplinary perspectives. Woodbridge: The Boydell Press, 291–301.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, D. 2005. ‘“Best practice” options for the legal recognition of customary tenure’, Development and Change 36, 3: 449–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forsythe, L. & Chidiamassamba, C.. 2010. ‘Auditoria de gênero’. Relatório final. ITC – Iniciativa Para Terras Comunitárias and Natural Resources Institute, UK <http://www.itc.co.mz/documentos/Relatorio-Auditoria-de-Genero.pdf>, accessed 27.12.2013.,+accessed+27.12.2013.>Google Scholar
Hall, D., Hirsch, P. & Li, T.M.. 2011. Powers of Exclusion: land dilemmas in Southeast Asia. Singapore: NUS Press.Google Scholar
Hughes, D.M. 1999. ‘Refugees and squatters: immigration and the politics of territory on the Zimbabwe-Mozambique Border’, Journal of Southern African Studies 25, 4: 533–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikdahl, I., Hellum, A., Kaarhus, R. & Benjaminsen, T.A.. 2005. ‘Human rights, formalisation and women's land rights in southern and eastern Africa’, Noragric Report No. 26. Aas: Norwegian University of Life Sciences.Google Scholar
Kaarhus, R. 2010. ‘Women's land rights and land tenure reform in Malawi: what difference does matriliny make?’, Forum for Development Studies 37, 2: 171–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaarhus, R. & Martins, S.. 2012. ‘How to support women's land rights in Mozambique?’, NORAD Report 3/2012 Discussion. <http://www.norad.no/en/tools-and-publications/publications/norad-reports/publication?key=390188>, accessed 26.12.2013., accessed 26.12.2013.' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Kaarhus,+R.+&+Martins,+S..+2012.+‘How+to+support+women's+land+rights+in+Mozambique?’,+NORAD+Report+3/2012+Discussion.+,+accessed+26.12.2013.>Google Scholar
Kyed, H.M. & Buur, L.. 2006. ‘New sites of citizenship: recognition of traditional authority and group-based citizenship in Mozambique’, Journal of Southern African Studies 32, 3: 565–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lubkemann, S.C. 2008. Culture in Chaos: an anthropology of the social condition in war. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
McAuslan, P. 2010. ‘Personal reflections on drafting laws to improve women's access to land: is there a magic wand?’, Journal of Eastern African Studies 4, 1: 114–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Migdal, J.S. 1994. ‘The state in society: an approach to struggles for domination’, in Migdal, J.S., Kohli, A. & Shue, V., eds. State Power and Social Forces. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 7–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norfolk, S. & Bechtel, P. (2013). ‘Land delimitation & demarcation: preparing communities for investment. Final Report’. Maputo: TerraFirma/CARE <http://gender.care2share.wikispaces.net/Gender%2C+Agriculture+and+Land>, accessed 27.12.2013,+accessed+27.12.2013>Google Scholar
Norfolk, S. & Tanner, C. 2007. ‘Improving tenure security for the rural poor: Mozambique – country case study’. LEP Working Paper 5. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
Peters, P. 2004. ‘Inequality and social conflict over land in Africa’, Journal of Agrarian Change 4, 3: 269–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, P. 2013. ‘Land appropriation, surplus people and a battle over visions of agrarian futures in Africa’, Journal of Peasant Studies 40, 3: 537–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, P. & Kambewa, D. 2007. ‘Whose security? Deepening social conflict over “customary” land in the shadow of land tenure reform in Malawi’, Journal of Modern African Studies 45, 3: 447–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quadros, M.C. de 2004. Manual de Direito da Terra. Maputo: Centro de Formação Jurídica e Judiciária.Google Scholar
Quan, J.F., Monteiro, J. & Mole, P.. 2013. ‘The experience of Mozambique's community land initiative (iTC) in securing land rights and improving community land use: Practice, policy and governance implications’, paper presented at the World Bank, Washington DC, April 8-11, 2013 <http://www.conftool.com/landandpoverty2013/index.php>, accessed 27.12.2013, accessed 27.12.2013' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Quan,+J.F.,+Monteiro,+J.+&+Mole,+P..+2013.+‘The+experience+of+Mozambique's+community+land+initiative+(iTC)+in+securing+land+rights+and+improving+community+land+use:+Practice,+policy+and+governance+implications’,+paper+presented+at+the+World+Bank,+Washington+DC,+April+8-11,+2013+,+accessed+27.12.2013>Google Scholar
Ribot, J.C. & Peluso, N.L.. 2003. ‘A theory of access’, Rural Sociology 68, 2: 153–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, A.I. 1950. ‘Some types of family structure among the Central Bantu’, in Radcliffe-Brown, A.R. & Forde, D., eds. African Systems of Kinship and Marriage. London: Oxford University Press, 207–51.Google Scholar
Schafer, J & Bell, R.. 2002. ‘The state and community-based natural resource management: the case of the Moribane forest reserve, Mozambique’, Journal of Southern African Studies 28, 2: 401–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sikor, T. & Lund, C.. 2009. ‘Access and property: a question of power and authority’, Development and Change 40, 1: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanner, C. 2001. ‘Report on a FAO workshop: common property tenure regimes’. Rome: FAO, Department for International Development, Rural Livelihoods Department.Google Scholar
Tanner, C. 2010. ‘Land rights and enclosures: implementing the Mozambican land law in practice’, in Anseeuw, W. & Alden, C., eds. The Struggle for Land in Africa: conflict, politics and change. Pretoria: HSRC Press, 105–30.Google Scholar
Tornimbeni, C. 2007. ‘“Isto sempre foi assim”: the politics of land and human mobility in Chimanimani, Central Mozambique’, Journal of Southern African Studies 33, 3: 485–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toulmin, C. 2008. ‘Securing land and property rights in sub-Saharan Africa: the role of local institutions’, Land Use Policy 26, 1: 10–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veldwisch, G.J., Beekman, W. & Bolding, A.. 2013. ‘Smallholder irrigators, water rights and investments in agriculture: three cases from rural Mozambique’, Water Alternative, 6, 1: 125–41.Google Scholar
Whitehead, A. & Tsikata, D.. 2003. ‘Policy discourses on women's land rights in Sub-Saharan Africa: the implications of the return to the customary’, Journal of Agrarian Change 3, 1–2: 67–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar