Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-09T22:24:35.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Variations in Skin Resistance and Their Relationship to G.S.R. Conditioning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

Irene Martin
Irene Martin*
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Any particular system which is being conditioned is likely to maintain a certain level of background activity throughout the experimental procedure; either of a discontinuous nature, as, for example, with eyeblink, heart rate and respiratory cycle, or continuously, as in the case of basal skin resistance and muscle tonus. This background activity or level of arousal does not remain constant but usually varies in time, presumably as a result of underlying neural excitation or inhibition. It may increase throughout an experiment if the subject becomes highly motivated, as with the gradients of muscle action potentials observed by Bartoshuk (1955), or decrease, if the subject becomes more relaxed and familiar with the set-up, as Duffy and Lacey (1946) found with level of skin conductance.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 106 , Issue 442 , January 1960 , pp. 281 - 287
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1960 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bartoshuk, A. K., “Electromyographic gradients in goal-directed activity”, Canad. J. Psychol., 1955, 9, 21–28.Google Scholar
Davis, R. C., “Factors affecting the galvanic reflex”, Arch. Psychol., 1930, No. 115, 5–64.Google Scholar
Idem , Buchwald, , Alexander, , and Frankmann, R. W., “Autonomic and muscular responses and their relation to simple stimuli”, Psychol. Monogr., 1955, No. 405, Vol. 69.Google Scholar
Duffy, , Elizabeth, , “The psychological significance of the concept of ‘arousal’ or ‘activation’ ”, Psychol. Rev., 1957, 64, 265–275.Google Scholar
Idem , and Lacey, O. L., “Adaptation in energy mobilization: changes in general level of palmar skin conductance”, J. exp. Psychol., 1946, 36, 437–452.Google Scholar
Estes, W. K., “Stimulus-response theory of drive”, in Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Ed. Jones, ), 1958, pp. 35–69. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J., The Dynamics of Anxiety and Hysteria, 1957. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Idem , “The place of theory in psychology”, in Experiments in Personality (Ed. Eysenck, ), 1960. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul (to be published).Google Scholar
Kleitman, N., Sleep and Wakefulness, 1939. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lacey, J. I., Bateman, Dorothy E., and VanLehn, , Ruth, , “Autonomic response specificity. An experimental study”, Psychosom. Med., 1953, 15, 8–21.Google Scholar
Idem , “The evaluation of autonomic responses: toward a general solution”, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 1956, 67, 123–164.Google Scholar
Idem , and Lacey, Beatrice C., “The relationship of resting autonomic activity to motor impulsivity”, Res. Publ. Ass. nerv. ment. Dis., 1958, 36, 144–209.Google Scholar
Malmo, R. B., “Measurement of drive: an unsolved problem in psychology”, in Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Ed. Jones, ), 1958, pp. 229–265. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Malmo, R. B., and Shagass, C., “Physiologic study of symptom mechanisms in psychiatric patients under stress”, Psychosom. Med., 1949, 11, 25–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, , Irene, , “Central depressant drugs and palmar skin resistance: a study of adaptation”, in Experiments in Personality (Ed. Eysenck, ), 1960. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul (to be published).Google Scholar
Idem , G.S.R. Conditioning: A Description of the Conditioning Process, 1959 (to be published).Google Scholar
Mundy-Castle, A. C., and McKiever, B. L., “The psychophysiological significance of the galvanic skin response”, J. exp. Psychol., 1953, 46, 15–24.Google Scholar
Richter, C. P., “The significance of changes in the electrical resistance of the body during sleep”, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 1926, 12, 214.Google Scholar
Spence, K. W., “A theory of emotionally based drive (D) and its relation to performance in simple learning situations”, Amer. Psychol., 1958, 13, 131–142.Google Scholar
Willett, R. A., “The effects of Doriden and meprobamate on some psychological processes”, in Experiments in Personality (Ed. Eysenck, ), 1960. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul (to be published).Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.