Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T18:20:16.829Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Unilateral Hydrocephalus

Report of Two Cases of the Non-Obstructive Type

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

R. M. Stewart*
Affiliation:
Leavesden Hospital, Watford

Extract

A single small aperture connecting each lateral ventricle with the dorsocephalic portion of the third ventricle provides the sole means of escape for cerebro-spinal fluid, and consequently it follows that any interference with its patency will seriously retard the outward flow of ventricular fluid. Complete, or even partial, closure of the foramen leads to a rapid increase in the volume and pressure of imprisoned ventricular fluid so that a condition of internal hydrocephalus is soon established. Usually both foramina are occluded, the hydrocephalus being therefore bilateral and the ventricles more or less symmetrically enlarged. In rare instances, however, only one foramen is obstructed, in which case the dilatation will, of course, be confined to the ipsilateral ventricle. Unilateral hydrocephalus of this obstructive type is commonly caused by inflammatory conditions in the neighbourhood of the foramen, or by pedunculated tumours attached to the choroid plexus which enjoy a degree of movement sufficient to permit intermittent or permanent blockage of the foramen of Monro. It is, however, possible to find examples of unilateral hydrocephalus in which the outflow of cerebro-spinal fluid through the foramen of Monro is unimpeded, and in these the cause of the ventricular dilatation is to be sought in some diseased condition of the cerebral wall which has become so weakened as to be unable to resist even normal ventricular pressure. Such expansion may be either limited to one part of the lateral ventricle, or general, involving the entire body with its horns.

Type
Part I.—Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1940 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashby, W. R., Stewart, R. M., and Watkin, J. H. (1937), Brain, 60, 149.Google Scholar
Cramer, A. (1905), Monats. Psychiat. u. Neurol., 17, 561.Google Scholar
Dott, N. M. (1927), Brain, 50, 548.Google Scholar
Gomez, Diaz y. (1933), Arch. de med. cir. y especialid., 36, 233.Google Scholar
Hinrichsmeyer, C. (1922), Arch. f. klin. Chir., 122, 742.Google Scholar
Hunt, E. L. (1916), Med. Rec., 89, 60.Google Scholar
Noronha, N. F. (1925), Journ. Ment. Sci., 71, 729.Google Scholar
Spiller, W. G. (1902), Amer. Journ. Med. Sci., 124, 44.Google Scholar
Tinel, Th. de Martel, and Guillaume, J. (1932), Rev. Neurol., 45, 415.Google Scholar
Von Mohr, (1842), Caspers Wochenschr., 121.Google Scholar
Weber, L. N. (1906), Arch. f. Psychiat. u. Nervenkr., 41, 64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, W. C. (1901), Amer. Journ. Insan., 58, 503.Google Scholar
Wilson, W. F. (1925), Journ. Ment. Sci., 71, 283.Google Scholar
Winkelman, N. W., and Eckel, J. L. (1924), Arch. of Neurol. and Psychiat., 12, 187.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.